preview

Anti Gun Policy

Better Essays
Open Document

Gun policy is unlike any other form of public policy. The topic is rich in content, stemming economics, history, political science, law, governments just to name a few of the disciplines. Unlike may forms of public policy, most everyone seems to have a set opinion when it comes to policies regarding guns. Many people focus on a desire to regulate gun commerce, possession, and use, with most policy proposals engendering intense controversy. America is distinct from other advanced nations because it is one of the only countries wherein the right to bear arms is constitutionally protected. America's relationship with guns, by the numbers, is unique in a tragic way. On an average day, 93 Americans are killed with guns and American’s gun homicide …show more content…

In the case of gun control there is a certain kind of tragic cycle that occurs and if the government wants to make a difference it must find a way to break it. The cycle of trying to prevent gun violence starts off when tragic accident occurs this might be a mass shooting in a night club or an elementary school. Though there’s more to gun control than just mass shooting the triggering event could be urban violence, an accident, or even suicide. There is going to be the outrage, anguish, and fear that appear calling for action. However, the reaction may lead to active engagement in political debate, but not necessarily to good policy or any policy that is actually implemented. After the December 2012 shooting at Sandy Hook, support for controls on gun ownership spiked to 51% of the U.S. population, per the Pew Research Center. Five years after the Sandy Hook shooting, there has yet to be any effective gun limitations. It could be that the time for effective gun legislation passed after the shooting at Sandy Hook, but how many more people need to be massacred for there to be any real and systemic change? The cycle (wheel) keeps turning more and more people are injured or even killed while the politicians debate. The reason to bring up this continuous cycle is to …show more content…

While the constitution does guarantee a right to bear arms it is still open to interpretation as to whether it the guarantee is in place to protect private property or to be a part of a militia protecting the USA. Either way, unlike most other nations, there is a long history within the US that goes back to the founding of the country and like freedom of speech, the right to bear arms is a passionate part of the ethos of the country. Therefore any attempt to regulate or denigrate that right will be seen by some as an attack on the constitution. The most practical way to balance this right with the practicality of today’s weapons, which are much more lethal than a musket of the 1700’s, is to regulate the accessories such as bullet types, magazine sizes etc. or regulate the process of obtaining a weapon through closing the loopholes that currently exist in the law background checks, waiting periods, or restrictions for mentally ill or previous violent

Get Access