Anti Imperialism Dbq

Now, we’re involved in a possible conflict with Spain.  It is possible that we might engage in an epic naval battle with the Spanish fleet in the Philippines. Hawaiian Islands provide us with the perfect coal station for our Navy and supply ships on the way to the Philippines. It is in America’s best interest to annex Hawaii as soon as possible.  If we do not act quickly, the British might annex Hawaii.  There’s no time to waste. The Filipinos have been fighting against the Spanish rule for some time now. Are we going to help them achieve their independence from Spanish rule?  If we deem that they’d be better of being independent, we will assist them.  But, if we deem that they’d benefit from being annexed, we might go ahead and add the Philippines to our oversea possessions. Like with the Hawaiians, the Filipinos will benefit from the Christianization of their islands. With the influx of American values, cultures, and language, we will be doing any country annexed a favor by allowing them into our nations cultural and economic prosperity.

According to the United States, democracy and Christianity were principal elements of a successful society. During the end of the eighteen-hundreds and throughout the beginning of the nineteen-hundreds, America tried to colonize and reform less fortunate nations. Following a social-Darwinist point of view, Americans took their “God-given” superiority to those who were incapable of establishing their own self-government (Doc. H). After much debate, American foreign policy towards the Philippines and Cuba was that it is our duty to rule them until they could rule themselves. We pledged to save the indigenous people from their savage, bloody, and corrupt ways of life. President McKinley’s foreign policy towards the Philippines stated that “they would soon have anarchy and misrule…there was nothing left to do but take them all, educate the Filipinos, and uplift and civilize them” (Doc. A).

The U.S. was filled with advocates who agreed with the annexation and with advocates who disagreed. Americans who denounced the annexation of the Philippine Islands believed that it would be act of tyranny and a decision made without consent. For example, in Document A, it states that the American-Anti Imperialist League believe that if America takes the Philippines without consent it will commit an act of despotism. The document also states that the group's intention is to fight against America’s expansion of power. The information adds on to the idea that the Philippines should not be annexed

If I had been alive in the late 1800’s, I would have taken the anti-imperialism side, because I feel that imperialism is immoral and inhuman. Imperialism is when bigger, powerful nations seek to dominate and take over smaller, and weaker nations. When the larger nation usually takes over they use military force, and basically rob the struggling little country of its natural resources for the powerful nations benefit. The natives that live in the weaker countries usually are treated horribly, and their voices are silenced due to the wealth, technology, and strength. These industrialized, and advanced factors just mad the more powerful countries think they were the most superior race above all others (known as racism) and only prompted them

Throughout the history of the world, imperialism has played a major role. Imperialism is one country’s complete domination of the political, economic, and social life of another country. Imperialism has many positive and negative effects. The Age of Imperialism is considered 1800 - 1914. During this time Europe became a major world leader. European countries set up colonies all over Africa, Latin America, and Asia, and encouraged their citizens to populate them. European imperialism boosted Europe’s economy, and made them a world power. Imperialization had an entirely different effect on Africa, Latin America, and Asia. People of these countries were mistreated, they lost their culture, land, and self respect. The negative effects of

Imperialism appears to be a vital goal and factor in the U.S during the late 1800s. Americans yearn to gain more control and soon rise to become a world power, similar to the conduct of our forefathers. However, this philosophy is counter to the origins of our country. We believed in life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, yet Americans were being hypocritical of this conviction. They took the action of colonizing other countries and tyrannizing them without their consent. With this in mind, it is clear this goes against American beliefs, owing to the fact we fought and struggled immensely to win our independence from England. In the end, are Americans still being mindful and empathetic of the other nations whether they are weaker or not fully developed? Or, are they only conscious of what they 'll get for themselves? Overall, retaining control of other countries without a settled agreement or negotiation and denouncing them of their liberty is truly un-American and goes against The Declaration of Independence.

The British imperialism is a negative impact on political, economic and social of Indian. The British controlled the government and made the Indians pay unfair taxes, grow cash crops and increased the frequency and severity of famines and manipulation of the cloth market. The British also wouldn’t let all Indians learn English. Why did the British do this to the Indians? The Indians politics had a negative Impact because the British controlled the government and made the Indians pay unfair taxes.

First reason, why we shouldn’t have annexed the Philippines is because we have different beliefs. In document B, Providence to the Americans mean Heaven. It means that the reason they were in war with the Filipinos is because it was their destiny. God gave them the strength and power so they can expand their empire. They didn’t care what the Philippines believed in, they took action in what they “knew” god would have wanted them to do. In document D, Bryan talks about how the Americans aren’t Christian as they say they are. He says, “

The Platform of the American Anti-Imperialist League spoke out about their opinion on America annexing the Philippines in October of 1899, a year after the annexation was placed. A Platform is a group or a political party who fights for a series of positions or beliefs. The American Anti-Imperialist League mentioned “We protested against the extension of the American sovereignty by Spanish methods” (Document A). The Filipinos were fighting against the United States and felt betrayed since they heard America was going to annex them. The Filipinos were demanding for their independence that they deserved, but America was too selfish to give it to them and denied their rights to have freedom. America was using military forces to pressurize these civilians to learn the United States ways of life and to learn christianity. They also put innocent people into concentration camps to feel powerful and in control. The United States took the role of Spain and treated these innocent people unfairly and with no

Some argued that imperialism will bring together the integration of races, benefit the Filipinos from becoming an anarchy, and help spread democracy throughout the world. However others argued against it because it would lead America to where Spain is, bring brutal violence and chaos to America, and bring forth another Era of Slavery and the division of the Nation.

Document Two: Aguinaldo criticizes America’s policies as America’s imperialistic effort to deny Philippines independence. In 1898 the U.S helped the Philippines gain their independence from Spain and they succeeded as Spain surrendered. His idea was to let the U.S know that he will fight for the Philippines real independence as U.S didn’t really let the Filipinos have their say on how they wanted to do things. He also brings up how the U.S government ignored all their promises and ignored the Filipinos rights and treated them as if they were an enemy. He then mentions how the U.S where governed by the British government and how they rebelled from it and the U.S succeeded to govern themselves. And he asks that the Filipinos get the same opportunity to

In a passage from Our Country, Josiah states, “let us hope, of the largest liberty, the purest Christianity, the highest civilization -- having developed peculiarly aggressive traits calculated to impress its institutions upon mankind, will spread itself over the earth” (674). This applies to the issues with the Philippines because it supports McKinley's reasoning for sending troops and “missionaries” over to convert the people but ultimately ended up wreaking havoc. “Aguinaldo’s Case against the United States” written by Emilio Aguinaldo explained why he opposed American imperialism. Emilio led the Filipino armed against Spain for Independence. He was against imperialism because he believed the Filipino’s were being treated unfairly, America thinking that they were “ignorant savages”. The point he made was that America was treating the Philippines like how the colonials were treated before they escaped England. Emilio asked for America to “give us the chance; treat us exactly as you demanded to be treated at the hands of England when you rebelled against her autocratic methods”. By America treating the Filipino’s this way, it tossed all their morals about liberty and out the door putting the Filipino’s in the position that Americans were in trying trying to escape from England’s

At the end of the Spanish-American War in 1902 the United States of America was officially imperializing the Philippines. The Treaty of Paris allowed the Philippines, and other countries, to be for sale. This allowed the United States to acquire the region and try to begin an empire. However, some United States citizens opposed the idea of Imperialism because they didn’t like the idea when it was done to them by the British. Yo.

Who were the anti-imperialists, and why did they oppose US acquisition of the Philippines? (Eight points)

The U.S should’ve annexed the philippines to protect them. The U.S needed to protect the Philippines because in Document B it explains that if they were are not there for them, the other countries would take over and they would treat them terribly. (Document B). Since the Philippines are an island it would influence other