Anti Isis Research Paper

As we move into the twenty-first century people are confronted with complicated and compromising matters affecting the intricately convoluted global system. New forms of aggression and threat are the faces that greet policy-makers as they spend many hours arranging ways to counter future attacks such as terrorism or massive drug trafficking across national borders. President George W. Bush has issued a mandate in an undertake to regain control over future acts of aggression such as terrorism in the United States; he issued the Executive Order of Homeland Security as that initial step.

Mr. President and Congress I urge you all to beef up manpower to track any further attack on our beloved country. The country that offer freedom for many; although freedom isn’t free because of the men and women who has relentlessly carried the burden to ensure that people can walk and talk free without any reprisal.

Our leadership will remain essential to disrupting the unprecedented flow of foreign terrorist fighters to and from conflict zones. We will work to address the underlying conditions that can help foster violent extremism such as poverty, inequality, and repression. This means supporting alternatives to extremist messaging and greater economic opportunities for women and disaffected youth. We will

Former President, Goerge W. Bush, in his 9/11 Address to the Nation, clarifies the stand of the American government concerning the terrorist attack on the nation. Bush's purpose is to create a sense of stability and introduce war against terrorism. He adopts a precise and firm tone in order to provide a sense of stability to every single person living in the United States.

Living the United State when one thinks of a terrorist attacks often their mind will first go to a larger scale attack such as the events of September 11th 2001. “September 11, 2001 changed the United States forever, the terrorist attack that day marked a dramatic escalation in a trend toward more destructive terrorist attacks which began in the 1980s. It also reflected a trend toward more indiscriminate targeting among international terrorists. The vast majority of the more than 3,000 victims of the attack were civilians. In addition, the attack represented the first known case of suicide attacks carried out by international terrorists in the United States.” (Waston, 2002) However as the years have gone by we have come to learn that terrorist attacks are not always on a large scale and that even one person who is inspired by the ideologies of a terrorist group without being directly connected to them can carry out attacks. Those that engage in this type of terrorism are referred to as lone wolf terrorist. A recent example of such an even was the mass shooting at the San Bernardino Inland Regional Center in December of 2015.

Al-Qaeda is a Sunni sunni Islamistislamist organization that was founded by Osama bin Laden. They have made an impact on many parts of the world. Impacts that would cause casualties that is. Just three organizations Al-Qaeda is tied to are the Haqqani, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and the Taliban. Although Al-Qaeda has few agents left in Afghanistan they still managed and manage to cause devastating acts of violence. One of the ways they were and still are able to make such an impact is by working with other organizations with similar views for their ideal future.

Where did Isis come from? Isis came from Egypt and was one of the most important goddess’ of ancient Egypt. Her name is the Greek form of an ancient Egyptian word for “throne.”

In addition to Afghan mujahidin, people fro other Muslim countries volunteered and one of the prominent figures was Osama bin Laden who came from Saudi Arabia to join mujahidin and fight against the Soviets. Also, fighters from Chechnya rushed to join the Mujahidin movements, the Soviets were officially atheists and detrimental to the Islam at large. The mountainous terrains of Afghanistan, the ethnic and linguistic differences among the mujahidin faction made it difficult for the groups to cooperate. However, by 1985 the corporation between the resistance groups improved and a network of alliance was created the Seven Party Mujahidin Alliance of Peshware Seven. Some of the prominate of the mujahidin commanders was Ahmed Shah Massoud, who was assassinated by the Taliban in 2001.

Lone wolf terrorism is perhaps one of the most widely misunderstood and opaque phenomenon currently threatening United States national security. Popularized by Tom Metzger and Alex Cutis, in the 1990s, the term, “lone wolf” is often defined as a person who prepares and commits a violent act on his or her own accord without orders from an organization. Although not a new method of terrorism, the rise of lone actors has become a growing threat to the United States. Over the last decade, the number of lone wolf attacks has steadily increased, resulting in 115 deaths and 160 injured (Hamm & Spaaj, 2015). Despite the emerging risk, proactive measures from law enforcement and intelligence communities are nonexistent, primarily due to the lack of research.

With the US being a leader on the global scale militarily and economically, Trump has come into office with a new vision, a somewhat controversial one. This essay will critique Trump’s controversial foreign policy objectives

There are five homeland security missions are preventing terrorism and enhancing security, securing and managing our borders, enforcing and administering our immigration laws, safeguarding and securing cyberspace and ensuring resilience to disasters (U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2010). Preventing a terrorist attack in the United States remains the foundation of homeland security. Accomplishing this idea entails us to emphasis on the primary goal of preventing terrorist attacks, emphasizing the challenges of preventing attacks using CBRN weapons and handling risks to critical infrastructure. A safe and secure homeland demands that we uphold applicable control of our air, land, and sea borders. Secure, well-managed borders should not just protect the United States versus threats from abroad they need to also accelerate the safe movement of legal travel and trade. It is also vital to encourage legal immigration, accelerate

The President of The United States in supposed to be the epitome of strength and leadership, but it has shrank considerably with the increasing amount of attacks under Obama’s two terms. No matter what we do, terrorists seem to keep cause considerable trepidation throughout all, and terrorist pose a gargantuan threat to other parts of the world. Barack Obama was going to eliminate these threats, but after two terms, the country is still having terrorists creating panic in the country, this was inevitable. Barack Obama should have taken more offensive and defensive measures against terrorists because we have had eight terrorist attacks since his presidency, we have had suicide bombers traipsing through our boundaries, and we have not had any progress through his judgement.

George W. Bush is often described as the worst president the US has ever had. For many, this harsh criticism is propelled by the great challenges of his presidency and the sheer problems that were left to his successor. Much of the reproach for Bush is valid, both domestic and international affairs worsened due to mistakes made under his leadership. We saw a rise in unemployment, an economy on the verge of collapse, and terrorist actions triggering two wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Despite the turmoil and challenges, George W. Bush demonstrates some positive change in his way of dealing with foreign policy. David J. Rothkopf in his book National Insecurity takes a look behind the scenes of George W. Bush’s decision-making and elaborates on the strengths and advancement of foreign policy throughout his presidency. Rothkopf is insightful and makes a strong case that Bush developed and improved overtime, comparing it to the lack of progress in Obama’s administration. So we must ask what can Barack Obama learn from his predecessor’s foreign policy decision-making. Is it too late for Obama to change?

As the acting Commander in Chief of The United States of America in the year 2017, I will make it my civic and sworn duty to uphold, protect, and preserve the rights and qualities that make up our beloved country. Above all else, it is essential for our nation to protect its own people and shield those who are defenseless in the face of an impending underworld of Armageddon. In 2017 it is imperative that we fight this war on terror. Radical Extremist organizations such as; Boko Haram, ISIS, and The Taliban threatens not only the Continental United States but also, our allies overseas. Moreover, as United States Americans it is our job to fight, defeat, and ultimately destroy any and all terrorist organizations who have threatened the civility

National security is one of the most important topics in American society being debated today. Every day America faces threats from around the globe and the United States government has to implement policies in order to protect our nation. A major part of this argument involves how the government should handle immigration from countries around the world, specifically countries with high levels of terrorist activity. The way this is handled daily could be the difference between a normal tragedy free day in America, or a second 9/11 scale attack. In order to defend against an attack of this scale, the President and his cabinet must implement the smartest policies that will provide adequate protection from foreign threats and still stick to American