Anti-Voucher Point of View Essay

American Federation of Teachers (2011). School vouchers: The research track record. Retrieved September 29, 2014 from: http://www.aft.org/pdfs/teachers/vouchertrackrecord0211.pdfBarnes, M. (2010, September 13). The Lemon Test and the Establishment Clause: A Proposal For Modification. Retrieved September 29, 2014.

Many advocates and policymakers of housing for the poor believe that to achieve optimal human development of low-income households the location of the housing must be considered as well as the quality of the housing unit (Newman, 2008).

This paper argues that school vouchers can have a tremendous impact on incentives and performances Depends on the type of voucher. Two types exist. The ‘voucher shock” and the “threat of vouchers.” Many people are against school vouchers. The argument is that the vouchers are a violation of constitutional rights. That spending funding and forcing schools to behave a certain way is unethical. However, many are supportive of the school voucher program. Parents feel that if a school is not up to par perhaps loosing students and perhaps closing the doors is the best choice. Many believe that children have a right to education and to decide exactly how the citizens tax dollars toward education are being spent and if the youth are educated properly.

Since the 1980s, charter schools have allowed families to exercise school choice, a practice that had begun a few decades earlier when parents preferred to control their children’s education because of religious views or racial prejudices. As dissatisfaction with the performance public schools grew during the late 20th century, parents called on government to subsidize an arrangement where children could receive adequate education outside of the traditional public school system. Thus, two major school choice devices emerged: charter schools, privately run schools that receive public funding, and tuition vouchers, which cover some or all of tuition at participating private schools.

Not all public schools provide education at an equal caliber; many districts, particularly in small towns and inner cities, lack the education to provide students with the same quality students receive elsewhere. In these cases, students are confined by invisible zoning lines to schools that do not offer the same opportunities that leave students without help. Because of this, vouchers were invented -- vouchers intend to help those students by giving them the necessary funding to attend private or charter schools. Vouchers programs promise to provide all students with the opportunity for a better education. These good intentions look extremely well on paper, when many real-life factors are not take into account. However, the truth of the matter is this: when implemented into America’s education system in real-life, voucher programs fail miserably for a multitude of reasons, starting with where the money for vouchers comes from: public education

Republican ideology has also stood for private school. Our senator wants to emphasize on private school and slowly want to replace public schools with private ones. According to District profile of District 16, 19.4% of our district’s population is school kids. Everyone is not privileged and financially able to attend a private school. Pushing people to educate their children in private school is not freedom of choice of education. Even if private education is being made free, we also need to consider if it is feasible and easily accessible to children or not. We need to consider situations where we don’t have one private school for a large area, so that students do not have to worry about time and distance to reach school. If I get elected as senator, I would give more priority to public schools as they have been serving our children with easy and quality education. I was educated from a public school, and I feel the education there is just as good as any private school. I would emphasize on how our children can easily reach schools, and economic condition should not be a barrier for children to learn. Every economic and ethnic group should be able to educate their children.

The Texas Republican position on education is to support the freedom of choice to pursue any means of education the parent desires, be it public, private, charter or homeschool (texasgop.org). I will work towards the implementation of a voucher system in my district to allow a greater freedom of choice to the parents. The system would be analogous to that of the voucher system used by Sweden. According to Anders Bohlmark and Mikael Lindahl, “We find that an increase in the share of independent-school students improves average performance at the end of compulsory school as well as long-run educational outcomes. We further find that the average effects stem primarily from external effects (eg,school competition)”. This system aligns with the desires of the Republican platform in maintaining

The first premise reveals that the voucher funds provided drive families in Cleveland to parochial schools; which are private schools affiliated with a specific church. The author's support against parochial schools indicates that they violate the First Amendment, demanding separation of Church and State. The counterexample provided is a technicality where the First Amendment is not violated. The unknown author states

Constitutional issue. Inherently a great number of private schools have a religious affiliation. If vouchers were allowed to be used for the school of choice, it’s no doubt that they would be used on parochial schools. This could possibly violate the separation of church and state (Colyandro, Russell, & Withers, 2017).

Will school vouchers ever be a solution to better the educational system in the United States? No, they will not. Five percent of Americans think that private schools are worse in academic qualities (Kahlenberg). It is said that “whatever the solution is, it is not using vouchers” (Duncan). A solution is to improve the public school system so that children will not need a voucher. A voucher is not needed if the public schools learn how to teach children that need vouchers. Instead of school choice for private schools only, it should be for public schools because at the end of the day it is about the education of the children. 70 percent in a USA Today survey says that parents should be allowed to send their children to whatever public school they want them to attend. Another solution is to learn how to educate low income students so that they will have the same opportunities as a middle or upper class student does. Just because they are lower class does not mean they have less of a chance than students of other social classes. Vouchers should not be about the money; they should be about the student’s education and the future they will have because of it. Yes, the public is not happy with the current educational system but with hard work and dedication it will get better for everyone everywhere in the United States. But if there is one thing

The article supports its’ argument or thesis with the premise that Cleveland’s voucher program violates the First Amendment. The First Amendment prohibits making of any law respecting an establishment of religion. The article supports its’ premise with the supporting argument that students are subjected to religious training, training that the United States government is financing. Students are required, by the schools that are receiving taxpayer dollars, to attend Mass or other religious services. The article supports its’ supporting argument by providing examples as to how the government voucher program funds parochial schools and ultimately violates the First Amendment. The Voucher program uses

In the United States, public schools get their funding from their respective state. As a student, it can be seen as concerning when one compares how much states spend on their schools. Many schools are inadequate in both an aspect of safety and effectiveness of the learning environment. As a result of inadequate subsidy across America, schools resort to taking drastic measures. Not only are the unequal sources of subsidy a difficulty, but the concept and execution of budget cuts also exacerbate the issue. In order to give every student in America equal opportunities for success, funding should be controlled by the federal government with a policy that enforces equity rather than equality. This is also a viable option that could be carried

Imagine going to school and finding half of your friends are moving to different schools because they have qualified for a school voucher. It’s difficult to see them go because you have known them all your life. It’s also difficult to watch them attend the school which everyone knows in your community is known to better than the one you are currently attending. Questions are also brought up to your mind with school vouchers. Students who don’t qualify may ask themselves am I put into a disadvantage because my friends are attending a school, which is known to better than mine? Did my friends choose to attend this school or were there parents up to it? These questions can cause a dilemma to the students and their families. There are

School Choice has gained popularity recently and shows potential in beneficial alternative options. The first supporting reason showing this, how vouchers put educational choices for children in the hands of the people who care the most; the parents. (Charlotte, Hays n/a) Evidence showing how the statement is true is the voucher program was developed in the 1980s to give low-income families more choice in where their kids go to school. Upper class families already have this choice. Therefore, the original voucher program got designed specifically for the choice of the parents. Having this option of vouchers, allow parents to be guides with power to where they so

All the parents have a right to decide the type of education that shall be given to their children.