Antz Essay: Governmental Issues Like Monarchy, Communism And Democracy

I don’t think we ever saw a political and economic system where the people are in charge. We've only seen different aspects of the same type of "civilization" with the dominant minority. During the American Revolution economic system didn’t fully appreciate peoples hard work to make the separation from Britain, people were paid low wages for their physically hard and were charged with high taxes like the Stamp Act, Declaratory Act, and Townshend Act. Today, things are not much better, many people work 9-5 underpaid jobs just to be able to pay off mortgage, bills, debts and taxes. Bureaucratic powers then and now don’t make use of all our human potential and don’t give many opportunities to “regular people” for individual expression and

The type of government that colonial America had was a democracy. Democracy in colonial America was a work in progress full of democratic and undemocratic features. Democracy is full of key features, some democratic and undemocratic. Also, some of the features can be a work in progress.

Colonial government is similar and different to our government in many ways. They can be different or similar in how one rules, how they choose a ruler, the government system or parties, the branches, or even how rulers made decisions.

Another important cause of the Democratic Revolutions of the seventeen-seventy's and the eighteen-ten was economic because the working people had to pay taxes. During the French Revolution, France became poor due to the financial situation of France that grew to become poor due to the foreign wars of Louis XIV that were high-priced wars from. As well during the ruling of King Louis XVI, his wife Marie Antoinette wasted money on unnecessary expensive. To get rid off this situation, King Louis XVI chose Turgot to be his Finance Minister. Turgot tried to lower the outgoings of the royal court so very class citizen can to pay taxes However, King Louis XVI ended up disagreeing with Turgot and go a new finance minister, Callone. Callone put the policy of

In the decade immediately following the signing of the Declaration of Independence, the colonies had to scramble to form effective state governments and a national government. While the continental congress already existed, it had no real powers and the states had no official constitutions. The constitutions they developed and they way they distributed power in that first decade was far from perfect but it had a few successes. For this period of time, most of the power was given to the individual state governments that formed immediately following the declaration of independence.

Occasionally celebrated with ceremonial tributes to an earlier period of history, today’s constitutional monarchies sometimes mark such affairs with the pomp and circumstance associated with an altogether different era.

In the movie antz there was a variety of different governments shown. The main one demonstrated was by General Mandible. He uses fascism also known at nazism. The general uses his workers to control the other ants in the colony to make sure they behave.But Z wants a direct democracy, he wants equality for everyone and freedom of speech. Z is tired of taking orders his whole life with no say in what he does and wants to do.

Unitary Systems – The central government makes ALL decisions concerning every issue the country and it’s different regions faces.

After the French Revolution, the nation of France wanted to take on a different type of governing. There were those who wanted to go back to the feudal system that was in place before and those who wanted a limited monarchy with a constitution. Edmund Burke and Emmanuel Sieyés were writers who had strong opinions on the both sides of the scale. Sieyés believed in the Third Estate, and believed that they could run a better nation, where as Burke said that the nobility or the Second Estate was the only people that could do that job. But as we can see Sieyés view was the one that thrived in the end.

The concept of absolute power was established in the seventeenth century and was prominent in Europe and Russia. Absolute power enabled kings and queens to have complete authority and power over their people. The kings and queens believed that through divine right, God gave them their power to rule over their country, hence their power was unconditional. The idea of absolute monarchy was a solution to the problem of an unorganized society. When absolute monarchies were established they began to spread across Europe and Russia.

Plato was born around the year 428 BCE into an established Athenian household with a history of political connections -- including distant relations to both Solon and Pisistratus. Plato's parents were Ariston and Perictone, his older brothers were Adeimantus and Glaucon, and his younger sister was Potone. In keeping with his family heritage, Plato was destined for the political life. But the Peloponnesian War, which began a couple of years before he was born and continued until well after he was twenty, led to the decline of the Athenian Empire. The war was followed by religious movement that led to the execution of Plato's mentor, Socrates. Together these events forever altered the course of Plato's life.

Through out our history and even in modern times, colonialism, imperialism and revolution have played a major part in the rise and fall of power structure and governance in the world. Societies have been overtaken, ruled, risen, and fallen. Wars have been fought for the power of one society, faction, or government to rule another. Non violent revolutions have enacted changes in power as well, making significant changes in power structures.

The United States government has transformed since it's beginning in 1776. The transformations have been good and bad for the general public. Some of the issues that are part of the problem in the government, are such things as the spoils system, tariffs and bimetallism.The reason why it is so hard to change these issues is because the people in charge are benefiting from them, even though the general public may not be.

Machiavelli's criticism of Plato's The Republic states that a ruler who possesses an inherent quality of that which is consistently good will never have the authority to rule his or her people successfully. If a ruler always treats his subjects in a manner, which can be qualified as good, then he will ultimately meet his demise, as his subjects will rise against him. Machiavelli claims that it is unrealistic to assume that all the people of a kingdom will conduct themselves in a manner that will be consistent with the ruling of a "good" leader. Such republics or principalities do not exist in reality and are entirely hypothetical situations.

A nation turnout is unquestionably the product of the one who is responsible for governing it. Two rulers who clearly demonstrate the validity of “A nation’s fate is determined by its ruler” are Peter The Great of Russia and Phillip the second of Spain. Both rulers had some great accomplishments that favored their nation but what is most important is the final outcome of a nation by the end of the Rulers death. Peter The Great had a great impact on Russia. His Rule changed what Russia had been for such a long time to something completely new that is still something that Peter had left behind. Phillip II of Spain also had a huge impact on the fate of his nation. Phillip had some great