Any Information Is Up On The Web, Stays On The Web, Except

Since the 9/11 attacks, concerns about the fine line between safety and privacy have arisen. It all began after the Patriot Act was enacted by the government to protect the safety of our country. One of its most controversial sections is section 215 which allows access to records and other tangible items under FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act). Many Americans argue its right for the government to have access to certain personal information for the safety of the country. Others allege this goes against the fourth amendment of the constitution which states people are protected from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. However, it does not protect against all searches and seizures, but only those that are thought unreasonable under the law.

In the Fourth Amendment of the U.S Constitution provides privacy as it states in the Constitution “the rights of the people to be secure in their persons, house, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched,and the persons or things to be seized.” this amendment assures you how you have the right to your privacy a personal life or just technology without a search warrants. The Fourth Amendment was added to the Bill of Rights because it deals with the privacy for the individuals and because the people have the right to feel secure in their house or while using their technologies. There has been many court cases regarding the rights that the Fourth Amendment provides. For example in the article “Creating a Fourth Amendment loophole” talks about how there was a policeman who suspected drugs in an apartment and kicked the door open without a search warrant. When they

While there is no “right to privacy” explicitly mentioned in the United States Constitution, the Supreme Court believes that several of the Amendments embody this right; specifically the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments [6]. The First Amendment protects the privacy of one’s beliefs [6]. The Third Amendment protects the privacy of the home against it being forcibly used to house soldiers [6]. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches [6]. The Fifth Amendment protects the privacy of personal information [6]. The Fourteenth Amendment provides for a right to liberty in the areas of family, marriage, motherhood, procreation, and child rearing [6]. And lastly the Ninth Amendment is a “catch-all,” declaring that just because a

Our rights play a big role in this debate of privacy. The fourth amendment is one of the laws that enforce the right to privacy. This amendment was passed by Congress on September 25th, 1789 and was ratified on December 15th, 1791. It was created to protect people from people such as the police to go through homes, private property, and in the current day: technology. It will always be debated about in terms of privacy and human rights. The Fourth Amendment is, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation and particularly describing the place to be searched and the person or things to be seized” (“Fourth Amendment”). In other words, we have a right to have our valuables and personal files not to be searched unless that person has a warrant. Not only can the Fourth Amendment protect us, but also put us in danger or jeopardise someone's safety. For example, “The Supreme Court decided in the mid-twentieth century that if the police seize evidence as part of an illegal search, the evidence cannot be admitted into court. This is called the

The Fourth Amendment allows electronic surveillance to be used to help solve crime while still protecting privacy. The NSA and FBI are looking directly into nine U.S. internet companies, extracting audio and video chats, photographs, emails, documents, and connection logs, which help to track foreign targets. The formal legal process required in Britain to seek personal materials such as emails, photos, and videos from an internet company based out of the country is being circumvented. It was agreed that they would minimize the amount of personal data being taken from people without a warrant and that people should know when their information is being used. Apple, for example, believes the customers have a right to know how their private information

Although the Fourth amendment protects our privacy and safety the government should be aloud to search our personal property with a search warrant given with a probable cause. A search in the eyes of the Fourth Amendment arises when a governmental employee or agent violates an individual's acceptable idea of privacy explains Cornell University Law school. Also, The American Civil Liberties Union says Fundamental problems say the government can not collect surveillance without probable cause. FISA amendment act signed into law by president Bush in 2008 expanded government authority to monitor Americans electronic communications claims the United states Senate Committee on the Judiciary. David Sirota Author of “Does the government actually understand

Privacy is what allows people to feel secure in their surroundings. With privacy, one is allowed to withhold or distribute the information they want by choice, but the ability to have that choice is being violated in today’s society. Benjamin Franklin once said, “He who sacrifices freedom or liberty will eventually have neither.” And that’s the unfortunate truth that is and has occurred in recent years. Privacy, especially in such a fast paced moving world, is extremely vital yet is extremely violated, as recently discovered the NSA has been spying on U.S. citizens for quite a while now; based on the Fourth Amendment, the risk of leaked and distorted individual information, as well as vulnerability to lack of anonymity.

The right to privacy is the protection against arbitrary government interference into the lives of its citizens. There are standards that must be met before the government can interfere into the private sphere of citizens; the state must prove that it has a legitimate interest in concerning itself with such matters.

"There is no explicit mention of privacy in the United States Constitution. But the courts have found a constitutional basis for privacy rights in the broad sense of freedom from interference in certain intimate realms of personal life. This is based on the protection of individual liberty from government interference in the Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth amendments to the Constitution. 3 The First Amendment protection of the freedoms of speech, assembly, religious practice, and so on, could also be seen as privacy protection in this sense. On the other hand, the right to free speech could be used to defend someone who invaded the privacy of others by publishing or disclosing their personal information.

• The right to privacy is protected by the U.S. Constitution. (The right to be let alone and free from unwarranted governmental intrusion.)

How much are Americans hiding? With internet and social media, these days it is hard to hide any personal information.  It is as easy as searching a person’s name in Google to find out any information needed about a certain individual. This allows any records to be available to be seen online, and a person’s past to remain apart of their future, or their internet search. Europeans on the other hand, can hide whatever they want on the internet with the “right to be forgotten,” requesting Google to take off any unwanted information from their search engine at any time. As Europe pushes for this law in the United States more everyday, many citizens in the U.S. can think of things they would want erased about themselves from internet searches, but they also need to think of how much they would want hidden from their own eyes about others. Although Europe strongly supports the “right to be forgotten” and giving internet users more control over their online reputations, the United States should not acquire this law because it would go against the first amendment (the right of free speech), it would be “unfair and deceptive”(Peterson, 2015, par. 2) to U.S. citizens, and it would allow other countries to determine American’s laws or freedom.

Privacy is mainly about trying to improve your social and business opportunities by concealing the sorts of bad activities that would cause other people not to want to deal with you" (qtd in Shaw 23). The general population really has nothing to hide from the government. According to the government, if that is the case, then the public has nothing to fear and should relinquish all rights to privacy. While in theory, that would be a grand solution, but Americans still want to feel as if they have a choice who sees their information and what particular information is shared. Corporations, such as Microsoft, Apple, and Facebook, use our browser history and internet search patterns to solicit us and recommend things that we may be interested in. We still feel that we have privacy, since these companies provide us with encrypted devices, however they themselves invade our privacy and use our information for data mining purposes. This can be compared to "digital Stockholm syndrome" (27). Consumers do not give a second thought to the price and overlook the invasion in their privacy to get the latest and greatest

Two types of laws are adopted by various countries to protect the sensitive information of individuals on the web. The first kind, comprehensive laws, are laws “that govern the collection, use and dissemination of personal information by both the public and private sectors”6. These general laws do not deal with individual areas like health care or educational systems. Instead, they establish standards for use of private information for all entities. Comprehensive laws are usually adopted for one of three reasons: to remedy past injustices, to promote electronic commerce or to ensure that laws are consistent with Pan-European laws7. In addition, comprehensive laws often require the establishment of an independent commissioner to oversee the enforcement of the law. Unfortunately, problems arise because either a lack of resources hinders

There has been different legislation concerning privacy rights where citizens are to be protected from unwarranted invasion of their personal information to be collected, use or release to third party. The United States Privacy Act which was enacted in 1974 allows protection of personal privacy. (US Department of State) In the recent cases of Apple against FBI, the government agency used “All Writs Act” on Apple and order Apple to assist the agency in their investigations. However, the case was rejected by federal magistrate judge and could have resulted in a precedent for rest of the incidents whereby Apple was ordered to unlock their company products for investigation purposes. The federal magistrate explained that while the act can allow

Technology has become very effective for a thriving generation, but it also possesses a handful of flaws that counter the benefits. Technologies help people post and deliver a message in a matter of seconds in order to get a message spread quickly. It also gives individuals the power to be the person they want to be by only showing one side of themselves. But sometimes information that had intentions of remaining protected gets out. That information is now open for all human eyes to see. This information, quite frankly, becomes everybody’s information and can be bought and sold without the individual being aware of it at all. However, this is no accident. Americans in the post 9/11 era have grown accustomed to being monitored. Government entities such as the NSA and laws such as the Patriot Act have received power to do so in order to protect security of Americans. However, the founding fathers wrote the fourth amendment to protect against violations of individual’s privacy without reason. In a rapidly growing technological world, civil liberties are increasingly being violated by privacy wiretapping from government entities such as the NSA, Patriot Act and the reduction of the Fourth Amendment.