Ap English Grammar Essay

Because of this, they are less concerned about prescribing rules to be followed since the language is going to change anyway. To descriptivists, it seems rather pointless. However, Garner refutes this stance by describing an earthquake. In the grand scheme of everything, a single earthquake hardly amounts to anything. Millions of other natural disasters happen every day in every continent of the earth. What makes that earthquake special? Compared to the rest of the world, it means nothing. But to the people living in the city where the earthquake struck, it means everything. So it is with grammar. One cannot simply say that good grammar and usage does not matter in the grand scheme of things. It matters to the people who are speaking the language right now! Garner argues that the majority of English-speakers have no concern over where their language is headed but are more concerned with correct usage and proper grammar. Garner also points out another issue which refutes the describers belief that language is one of instinct, not of choice. Garner quotes MIT graduate, Steven Pinker, who relates language to the song of the humpback whale. Pinker criticizes the prescriptivists in their stringent rules that confine individuals to make what he believes to be unnecessary choices because he believes that

Based on your existing knowledge of American Indian–colonial relations in North America, write an argument to use as the basis of your research.

From generations to generation grammar has been a big part of the English language. It has also changed since it first develops. From texting complete sentences like “See you later” to “C U l8r” or from using the spelling two and using the number form of it to replace that. Using slang word such as those can ruin a person’s reputation. In the stories of The Joy of Texting by Lynne Truss and I Won’t Hire People Who Use Poor Grammar. Here’s Why. by Kyle Wiens, both show some main similarities for it uses of correct grammar and why it should be that way. Grammar can make or break a person and could cost serious chances in life.

I graduated high school from Ballenas Secondary in 2005, and in July travelled to Europe. I enjoyed Europe so much that I moved to Germany until August 2006. While in Germany I traveled Europe, Northern Africa, and the Mediterranean area of the middle east. While in Germany, I worked at a local bar in Regensburg (near Munich) and enjoyed learning the German language.

As I began to search for an article in the paper to write about that interested me, I was immediately drawn to a title that threw me off; "Why Kids Can't Write," by Dana Goldstien. Considering myself a kid I decided it would be worth a read to try and decipher what I agreed with in the article and what I did not. Early on in the article, the author begins talking about the probable root of the issue; how kids are being taught. She says, "Focusing on the fundamentals of grammar is one approach to teaching writing. But it's by no means the dominant one." As early as second grade, I remember learning grammar, spelling, and punctuation. When deciding what to write about, the topic of discussion was what one did over the weekend, or had for dinner

Mignon Fogarty exceeded my expectations in her book for ‘quick and dirty’ grammar tips. Personally, the most exciting information in this book was located in the “Dirty Words” section where she provided a great deal of information on commonly misused words. This section provides a great directive to words with similar spellings or definitions; additionally, a great deal of her “versus” paragraphs allowed a better understanding of their rules and exceptions. It was surprising, for me, to read Fogarty’s email and twitter etiquette tips. These guidelines helped provide a more modern feel for readers. She connects with her audience by using a lot of her own experiences to help teach readers. Fogarty uses many examples to provide a friendly comparison

“Writers Do Not Follow Rules” by Patrick Tompkins and “The Wrong Way to Teach Grammar” by Michelle Navarre Cleary were two articles that wrote what I have been complaining

Today, formal grammar is essential in our academic careers, requiring us to write concise and professional assignments in order to exercise creativity and leave impressions on instructors. Although, the effectiveness of the explicit instruction of formal grammar is still under speculation; even individuals from academic and research backgrounds are skeptic about whether explicit formal grammar instruction is effective at all. Although, it sounds only nonsensical to even consider abolishing this instructional method, for why should learning grammar be based on one’s own knowledge of it? Why should the student’s initial experience with grammar be deemed as more important than proper instruction? The explicit instruction of formal grammar in society is necessary, for the consequences of removing this practice can prevent core grammar from being taught in the first place; also, even if other methods would prove more effective, applying this would be too much of a risk, and ultimately keep students from discovering talents, and make it more difficult for foreign students to learn English as a second language.

“People who think that grammar is just a collection of rules and restrictions are wrong. If you get to like it, grammar reveals the hidden meaning of history, hides disorder and abandonment, links things and brings opposites together. Grammar is a wonderful way of organising the world how you'd like it to be.”

In my arguments, I rely on research from well-educated linguists such as David Crystal and John McWhorter, who also inspired me to use a writing style which combines both humour and composure. Even the text should be interpreted as an argument of its’ own, as although I am part of the ‘texting generation’, I am capable of producing an engaging

There is no doubt that there is a need for SL learners to acquire a good control of grammar to express themselves effectively and clearly if they choose to use it for work , study,\ or academia, however, the controversy is not if grammar should be taught, but how grammar

Throughout this course I feel that I have immensely improved my writing skills. Before taking this class, I really disliked writing. I would much rather read than write. I never wanted to take this class, but my parents strongly encouraged me to because they wanted me to be challenged in school. I was terrified to be in a college level class with seniors and a bunch of other people I did not know. I took this class anyways because I did not have any other better options. Of course I still do not like to write, but the skills this class has taught me makes writing so much less stressful. Before taking this class, the longest paper I had written was probably around one to two pages long. In this class, I have written much longer papers, including a six page research essay. My grammar skills have also improved a considerable amount from having to write so frequently. Throughout this course, I have learned the kinds of papers I prefer writing, improved my grammar and organization, and my perceptions of certain topics have changed.

Grammar is the basis for the English language, yet is not uncommon to approach a teenager, or even an adult that has a genuine fear and even a distaste for grammar. While they likely know the value of such a construct, the endless rules and complex exceptions to grammar rules has created a sense of dread among many learners. Yet, it is not only the student that shies away from grammar conversations, but many teachers themselves feel inadequate in the grammar usage, both in speaking and writing, as well as their assessment of student writing. With the national push to embed writing across the curriculum, many teachers feel ill-prepared to assess students on their grammar. While they may concede it is important, many teachers would argue the place for grammar is only in the English classroom. However, this poses the question, if students isolate grammar usage to their English class, how will they be equipped to transfer correct usage skills in their future careers which will likely be outside the field of English?

“To Teach Or Not To Teach Grammar In The Primary School Classroom: That Is The Question”

Some people say that learning foreign language should be an activity in which the learners try to use that language as often as possible, not only try to know about that language which means the learners only try to understand the grammar. They believe that the most important thing in learning foreign language is that the learners can speak , communicate or delivers their ideas to other people, without considering or minding whether in their communication they use grammatically- good utterences or not. This belief is based on the fact that other people can understand the idea we communicate or deliver although we use grammatically-incorrect utterances.The legendary