Ap European History Dbq: French Nobility Essay examples

Both Europe and Japan had a category In Europe the nobles there was a category of people called the “ knights.” In Europe before they became a knight and were in training they were called squires. They were taught to fight at a very young age and grew up to follow the code of chivalry. They inducted just like the president in our time. They had to say the Oath of the Chivalry. Once they were inducted they had to follow the Code of Chivalry.The Code of Chivalry was a series of rules that had to be followed by knights in order to be worthy of being one. If these rules were not followed then they could be executed depending on how severe the decision was. There are many different theories on when this rule

During this period in French history, the nobility was starting to gain power and prestige, and this power presented the king with a problem: he needed to have strong nobles to strengthen his realm by extension. However, he still had to maintain power and his position of supremacy. Richelieu posits that the king must maintain a firm system of punishments and rewards:”Punishments and rewards are two quite necessary elements in the conduct of states. It is an ordinary allegation, but more true, and often repeated by all men, that rewards and punishments are the two most important tools of government available in a realm.” This system played on the honor obsession the nobility had, and strengthened the kingship at the same time. If one helped the king, they were rewarded with more honor and a higher position; if they resisted, they lost everything. This strengthened the kingship as well. Those he rewarded would be assets to the kingdom, while those he punished would serve as warnings to those who considered resisting.

Imagine being treated great and then one day having it all fall down and be treated like servants. That's what happened to the Nobles because of Absolutism. The king started controlling them like crazy and they had no freedom to do anything. The king says “I order you not to sign anything not even a passport.” (Source 1, Louis XIV). The King says this because he wants to do everything himself and have complete power over everyone

The French Nobility has been around since the beginning of the Roman Empire. Similar to the Romans, the French organized their state around the nobility and the clergy, not taking into account the massive amount of commoners. The Third Estate was finally created centuries later to help bring order and give common people their own place within society. Charles Loyseau and Isabelle de Charriere are two prime sources that compare French nobility during the 17th and 18th century, leading up to the French Revolution. Charles Loyseau, both a jurist and legal scholar evaluates French society in his writing A Treatise on Orders. In the writing of his treatise, Loyseau describes the “social anatomy of France” in an

The French Revolution evokes many different emotions and controversial issues in that some believe it was worth the cost and some don't. There is no doubt that the French Revolution did have major significance in history. Not only did the French gain their independence, but an industrial revolution also took place. One of the main issues of the Revolution was it's human costs. Two writers, the first, Peter Kropotkin who was a Russian prince, and the other Simon Schama, a history professor, both had very opposing views on whether the wars fought by France during the Revolution were worth it's human costs. Krapotkin believed that the French Revolution was the main turning point for not only France but for most

However it can be argued that Gerald did not reflect the political role of a noble in the 10th century, shown through his greater obligation to monastic duties than secular political influence. Gerald wore “old fashioned woollen or linen clothes” as “his strength lay in God rather than in gold or the multitude of riches” . This was unlike nobles at the time, who undoubtedly would have gained more political control by looking presentable and appearing as a typical respectable noble. Although religion would have been an integral feature in the lives of nobility,

In the early 1600s, France’s social status was divided into three estates; the first estate, the second estate, and the third estate. The first estate composed of the clergy, who received authority from God, which ranked from perished priests to the Archbishops. The second estate was the nobility, received authority from the clergy, whom ranked from knights to dukes and princesses. The third estate consists of commoners who were divided into three groups; the Bourgeoisie, Sans-Culottes, and the peasants. During the 1600s, a traditional man was supposed to be dominant, be head of the house and were not allowed to rule unjustly. As for women, they had to be subservient, dress conservative, and quiet. As Moliere proceeds to introduce the characters in Tartuffe, distinct characteristics can be analyzed from their status and character throughout the 1600s in France.

Nobility in the medieval time shad unquestionable value attached to it. Majority of the nobles lived their lives in luxury and were rich beyond the common man’s wildest dreams. The thought of the medieval knights often brings nobility in mind, hence the question whether knights had to emanate from the noble class. Exemplary works by Sir Thomas Malory (1408–1471) recount the marvelous adventures of chivalrous, heroic knights of super-human ability. The knights, abiding by the chivalry's strict codes of honor and demeanor went on quests to fight and defeat monsters and giants, thereby winning favor with a lady.

to get all the power of France. It should also be said that not all the nobles

After being ruled by a prime minister for so long, France needed some changes. That is exactly what Louis the XIV would bring to France. In an age of separation, Louis wanted to start a unification process. He started this by giving himself sole power and also only having one religion for the country. The king is always the center of attention good or bad. Louis was prepared to take the good with the bad, and handled it well. He emphasized the king as the center of attention. While some see him as egotistical and greedy, Louis was one king who knew how to make improvements.

Middling Problems Kings are the ones who lead and conquer. Lords are the ones who rule and sit barking orders to the lower classes. Knights are the ones who follow their code of honor, chivalry at its finest. Peasants are the ones who work until their bodies give out just to provide for their family. These are words that depicted the social hierarchy during the Middle Ages or rather, the Dark Ages.

Historians have engaged in debate regarding the metamorphosis of the nobility from landowners who fought when required to do so by their ruler, into the educated, political advisors and administrators of the crown. For

The social class of a Western Medieval citizen played a significant role in the attitudes and behaviors one was expected to maintain. Honor and glory were brought to those who knew their place in society and never strayed from it. Nobility were no exception to this as we can see in the case of Roland, a great knight whose life is portrayed in The Song of Roland. The setting of Roland’s life is during the Carolinian era during the battle of Roncevaux between France and the Islamic people. The unknown author of this epic poem portrays Roland as a near faultless man who is able to uphold the duties of knighthood and sustain his place in the feudalistic society.

Covering a period which starts with the Hundred Years War already in full swing, contains the start of the Wars of the Roses and ends with last English king to die in battle the level of participation of the aristocracy and the roles which they fulfilled is a natural continuation of the topic, especially given how kings can be lauded or vilified for their participation or non-participation in military matters but it was the nobility who functioned as military commanders or otherwise notable figures in the battles who had much greater military command, often give entirely to their discretion. Whether the role changed drastically during the hundred and fifty year period is debatable, as it what would constitute a drastic change and how it

which knights of his day had to contend may help explain why Wolfram depicts his