Apollo 11 Research Paper

One primary goal of space exploration is astrobiological. Using lunar geology to determine the conditions of the early

Planning for the Apollo Space Program began in 1957 and the program ended in 1972. The Apollo Space Missions increased our understanding of the moon. The goal of the missions was to land men on the moon and return them safely to earth. This goal was achieved with Apollo 11. On July 20, 1969 man walked on the moon for the first time. This was a huge step in space exploration and much preparation had gone into it. Apollo 8 orbited the moon, but did not test a lunar lander, and Apollo 9 tested a lunar lander while orbiting earth. After achieving the goal of getting man to the moon, the Apollo program continued to enlarge our understanding of the moon. Apollo missions 12 and 14 installed seismic stations on the moon’s surface. This led us to the discovery of “moonquakes”, which are essentially earthquakes on the moon’s surface.

On July 20th, 1969, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin landed on the moon....or so they say. It has been debated that the landing was actually fake, based on some characteristics in the photos that were taken on the moon. While majority thinks that the moon landing was indeed real, there is more evidence that proves it was fake. For example: The American flag planted in the moon, Buzz Aldrin’s footprint, and mysterious lights appearing in the sky all have hidden things in their photos that could have been impossible in outer space.

Apollo 13 was the seventh attempted mission to go to the moon for the third time in April 11th 1970. The men who were assigned to that mission were Jim Lovell Fred Haise and Ken Mattingly. However Ken Mattingly got diagnosed with the measles, so they had to replace Ken with Jack Swigert who was the backup command module pilot for the Odyssey.

This is a country of many heroes and though we honor lots of them we will never be able to honor everyone. I believe that a group of these heroes who deserve a holiday are the Apollo 11 mission control and team, Apollo 11 was the space mission in which Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin stepped onto the moon.

There are many different theories about how the moon was formed. People believe different things. I believe one is more reliable than all the others. I think the Big impact theory is the most trustworthy. The Big Impact theory has many different pieces of evidence behind it. The other ones i could barely find any.

For the enrich project I decided to research and look into the Apollo missions. I watched the movie Apollo 13 with my husband not long ago, and I really got an interest in what really happened with all of those missions and what they led to. The concept of searching space was something that was extremely interesting for everyone at that time. The first Apollo mission completely failed, and there was a fire killing all of the astronauts in the shuttle. It took until Apollo 11 to actually land on the moon. There were many other attempts after that, only succeeding on Apollo 17. Other than those two times, of over 10 tries, there were two moon landings. This was something that was amazing. Many people thought that the whole concept of

In 1975, two scientists by the name of Dr. William K. Hartmann and Dr. Donald R. Davis, came up with a groundbreaking new theory on how the moon was created. Their theory stated “At the time Earth formed 4.5 billion years ago, other smaller planetary bodies were also growing. One of these hit earth late in Earth 's growth process, blowing out rocky debris. A fraction of that debris went into orbit around the Earth and aggregated into the moon” (Hartmann & Herres 1). This theory is known as the Giant Impact Theory and is the accepted theory in the scientific community of how the moon was created. Even though this theory is accepted by most, there are still some people who don’t hold this theory to be true. I agree with Davis and Hartmann’s Giant Impact Theory that a great collision occurred and created the moon. The Giant Impact Theory is supported by the lack of iron on the moon, the moon rocks from the Apollo missions, and its acceptance in the scientific community.

On July 16th, 1969 the Apollo 11 spacecraft launched from Earth and landed on the moon four days later. It was the first of six manned spacecraft to land on the moon, all launched by NASA and the United States. Conspiracy theorists have tried to prove that the moon landings were fake from the moment the Apollo 11 spacecraft landed on the moon. One of the conspiracy theorists’ biggest pieces of evidence against the moon landing are two photos from NASA, which have been proven to actually be taken on the moon. Another piece of evidence that supports the idea that the moon landings were real is that a Japanese explorer found the Apollo 15 launch area on the moon.

One of the key pieces of evidence of the moon landing is photo evidence. Numerous photos as well as video have been released and seen by the public. One of the

1. "Apollo Moon Rocks." Curators Chioce. Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. 15 Oct. 2007 http://www.nasm.si.edu/exhibitions/cchoice/moonrocks/moonrocks3.htm.

About half of the lunar Nearside - and virtually all of the Farside - is covered by heavily cratered highlands, the light-colored regions which, as seen from Earth, contrast so strongly with the darker-colored mare. Because the mare rocks are relatively young and cover far less than half of the lunar surface, the scientific community needed highlands samples if they were going to understand lunar geology. To be sure, the Apollo 11 and 12 collections contained significant numbers of small rock fragments which differed markedly in composition from the bulk of the mare-derived

Despite the theory of how the moon was formed from a single impact with Earth, samples taken from the moon and lunar meteorites have illustrated that the Earth and the Moon possess compositions that are fairly analogous. Also another contradicting piece is that there are some issues in honing the impact to give it the same angular momentum of Earth’s specific moon system. Though there are solutions to both these contradictions, neither answers every question. For example, one can theorize that the impactor itself had a similar make-up to Earth’s, but that itself is statically unlikely. For the second hypothesis, some scientists have argued that this process would have taken a long time and that this contradicts a few theories on when the moon was formed. New research this year (January 11th 2017 in Science Advances to be exact) helps build on the idea that the moon came together at a faster pace and formed about 4.51 billion years ago. Aside from when and how the moon was formed, findings suggest that water may have been in abundance on the moon during its formation and played a key part in how it was

The “giant-impact hypothesis” explains the creating of the moon by a collision of the Earth by a large size rock named Theia. In the past, scientist explained that the rock Theia collided at an angle towards earth and vaporized Theia completely and part of Earth. The debris then came back on Earth and some debris orbited Earth creating the moon. Samples of rock from the Moon are identical from Earth that gives evidence to this theory. Over the past 15 years, more evidence suggested that the rock Theia made a high-energy impact that decimated both Theia and most of Earth, the dense vaper than formed an atmosphere that filled a space than 500 times bigger that today’s Earth. Some debris than collided back to Earth and some formed the Moon. Scientist

The currently favoured theory of the Moon's origin is a combination between the Capture and Daughter themes. This idea is called the Impact Theory, with its main principle being the possibility of a large object colliding with a young, molten Earth. The matter that was dislodged from Earth, would then have assembled together in space to form the Moon. This collision would have been more of a slight blow, than a direct impact, and it is now thought that these types of collisions would have been fairly frequent during the beginning of our solar system. This theory accounts for both of the differences and similarities between the Earth and its moon. If the Earth's iron core had already been formed by the time the collision took place, then computer