Apple Paying Strategy: Apple Company Compensation And Payment

Their program is created to drive performance through a mixture of near-term finances, working goals and long-term focus on their stock price performance. The reliability in how the company achieves their compensation program and their objectives under that program has proven to be a significant influence. Their viewpoint remains to accentuate fairness within compensation as the most important element of the NEOs’ total program that supports our pay-for-performance purposes. (EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION, 2016)

One of the important aspects of business management is having a proper compensation system. Compensation ensures that the staff of the company obtains the results of their efforts. Compensation is a cost to the enterprise and, therefore, a proper remuneration model must demonstrate its ability to produce returns. Also, since compensation is what the employees get in exchange for their services, the type used must be one that will motivate the employees (Belcourt & McBey, 2015). Henderson printing company is a mid-level company. Therefore, it requires a very critical remuneration system that will help it to survive. This memo explores the compensation models that Henderson printing operates as well as suggests the necessary changes.

Apple’s employees have a huge influence on the company they want to be provided with livelihood and want security and rewards, because of this Apple may put a reward system in place based on the sales. They will set a team a particular sales target or goal if they meet this they will be given a bonus, this helps the company by increasing profit through more sales.

“Compensation represents both the intrinsic and extrinsic rewards employees receive for performing their jobs.” Martocchio, J.J. (2013) A Human Resource Management Approach. Compensation as most know is the hourly or annually paid. Compensation consist more of just hourly or annually pay. Organizations create monetary compensation process to reward their employees for their job performance. Monetary compensation is the core of

This report examines 3 different compensation systems that our company can develop and enforce within our company for our employees. Compensation is the most important and rewarding factor for employees, so a thorough and thoughtful approach should be taken as we think about changing the way in which this company rewards it's employees for the work they do for us each and every day.

Pay and reward systems exist in the form of pay, bonuses and benefits, financial and non-financial and designed to improve performance, increase motivation, staff retention and increase profitability. Appreciation and gratitude is widely received as reward and the opportunity for training and development for career progression.

All base salaries will be set with in a range depending on experience, education, qualifications and position. These salaries will be set according to the market percentiles at similar organizations. All salaries will be reviewed for competitiveness on an annual basis and adjusted if the market and financial performance allows. Adjustments will be based off of performance reviews, experience, and overall contribution to the organization. Unless there is an exception from the CEO all salaries will remain on or below market target numbers. Incentive pay awards will be given to those who reach the pre-determined performance goals listed. All compensation plans will focus on improving performance and achieving strategic goals. Pre-determines

Summary: Commission based employment can appear to be a transparent reward structure based on success and is a common way to reward top performers. “Commission based pay can make the employee feels they are sharing in the organizations success which motivates the individual to maximize their success” (Clark, Robert, and Sylvester Schieber Fourth Quarter 2000). This compensation strategy allows employees to work hard and get further. The theory with harder work more pay will occur. The employee is paid based on how they perform or how much they sale. If they sale

A well-articulated compensation philosophy drives organizational success by aligning pay and other rewards with business strategy. It provides the foundation for plan design and administration and anchors current and future plans to the company's culture and values (Kaplan, 2006, p.32). Recognizing and rewarding achievement is the cornerstone of the company A’s compensation philosophy. The mission of the company is to attract, select, place and promote all individuals based on their qualifications. The company believes that performance-based compensation helps attract, develop and retain talented professionals. In addition to base pay which based upon local market conditions and targeted to be above market, the company provides the following types of potential compensation to reward performance:

This paper will examine setting the stage for strategic compensation and bases for pay. There are three main goals of compensation departments: internal consistency, market competitiveness, and recognition of individual contributions. Internally consistent compensation systems define the relative value of each job among all jobs within a company. (Martocchio, pg. 22, 2011) With this system companies want employees to be paid more based on their qualifications and responsibilities. They believe someone with less experience should be paid differently. To determine such evaluation companies use job analysis in order to provide job descriptions. The job evaluation is to determine pay according to a particular position. Market-competitive

Reward Management (RM) has been defined as the distribution of monetary and non-monetary rewards to employees in an effort to align the interests of the employees, the organisation, and its shareholders (O’Neil, 1998). In addition O’Neil (1998) also suggests that a RM system can serve the purpose of attracting prospective job applicants, retaining valuable employees, motivating employees, ensuring legal requirements relating to direct and indirect rewards are not violated, assisting the company in achieving human resource and business objectives, and ultimately assisting the organisation in obtaining a competitive advantage.

Apple had nearly $137 billion of cash at the end of Dec 2012. Over the past few years, the Company had been highly successful with the launch of the iPhone 3G in 2008, and which was followed by the launch of iPad in 2010. The Company enjoyed high profitability, and was able to keep its costs at a minimum. The gross margin on the iPhone was between 49% and 58% from October 2010 to March 2012, and the gross margin on the iPad was between 23% and 32% in the same time period. Apple’s capital structure included no debt; hence, there was no outflow of cash for making interest payments.

was renamed Apple Inc. on January 9, 2007, to reflect its shifted focus towards consumer

The final problem that we identified is the incoherence of inclusion of the cumulative merit in the calculation of salaries. In the case-study we can read that the system includes cumulative merit. However it is not clear how it is included in the compensation system. In one hand it is said that they measure performance over time at Vitality but in the other hand it is not accounted for rewarding employees.

Creating and implementing of incentive pay system supports to solve organizational problems to align the preferences of business and employees. In addition, the system serves as an organizing tool to identify and attract the most capable employees since companies need to deliver the product or