Application Of Law And Legal Assisting

The Association alleged in its lawsuit that certain elements of the property were not constructed in a good and workmanlike manner including 1) failure to properly install and flash windows and other exterior penetrations; 2) properly caulk the exterior penetrations; 3) failure to properly install the weather resistive barrier; 4) failure to properly to install the stucco exterior; 5) failure to properly install the EIFS exterior and 6) failure to install brick exterior.

This agreement, made on August 1, 2015, to begin on September 1, 2015 between Adam Cmar and Summer-Lynn Cmar,(going forward stated as Adam & Summer-Lynn or “Landlord(s)”), and Paul Eric Tickle,(going forward stated as Eric or “Roommate(s)”) Melanie Margaret Tickle,(going forward stated as Melanie or “Roommate(s)”) this agreement poses as witnesses that Adam & Summer-Lynn have agreed to provide 2 ROOMS to Melanie & Eric Tickle, along with their son, Jeremiah, and the “Tenant(s)” have agreed to receive both rooms from Adam & Summer-Lynn at 25 Wells Ct, in the City of Rocky Point, North Carolina, to be occupied as a strictly private dwelling space by the above named individual and no other persons. This Roommate Agreement is a legal and

Yes. Bloomington housing code was in effect at the time of the lease. Landlord breached implied warranty of habitability. Burke and Maltbie had a reasonable expectation that their basic housing needs would be met. Tenants

On December 31,2015, Ms. Miner agreed to rent unit #3 to Plaintiff, a former tenant of Portola complex (Exhibit 4). Plaintiff worked as a waitress at Danny’s restaurant and resided in unit #3 for one year before her lease expired on December 31, 2016. Although Plaintiff regularly paid rent in a timely fashion, during her tenancy, however, multiple noise complaints and damage sustained to the unit has subsequently lead to her renew lease denial on December 2, 2016. Moreover, Plaintiff never repaired the garbage disposal in her unit in accordance with her leasing agreement.

Johnson are required to allege facts that, if taken as true, demonstrate that the parties mutually assented to "a certain and definite proposition" and left no essential terms open. On December 2016, Mr. Jenkins, Mrs. Johnson and Mrs. Cooper, in a good mental capacity and fully aware of their actions, agreed to became roommates and to sign a one-year lease agreement. The arrangements between them is proven by voluntarily acceptance of the rules and terminations listed in the verbal contract, which are: acceptance of a period of a time during which a party’s shared the apartment, financial responsibility for each of the party’s, an assumptions of the consequences if one of the party’s refuses to perform the obligations. None of them was forced to live in the same place, so the decision to rent an apartment was made on the basis of the consent of each party and an assumption of personal liability for the payments. As was mentioned earlier, in order to state a claim for the breach of an oral contract, the aggrieved party must show three elements: a

The right of the accused to be supplied the right of free representation within the Australian legal system is something which is difficult to uphold and problematic, therefore is near impossible to follow through with. Within this issue there are two main stakeholders, which consist of the accused and the legal system, for example the lawyers, judges and courts within Australia.

The Tecumseh condominium complex is a waterfront condominium complex located at 312 Severn Avenue, Annapolis, Maryland. (Compl. ¶ 1). On September 1, 2016, Plaintiff, Doreen Byrne (“Byrne”) was a tenant in a condominium unit rented to her by Defendant, Tecumseh Condo, LLC (“Tecumseh”). (Compl. ¶¶ 3, 15, 23). On February 13, 2017, Plaintiff, Doreen Byrne (“Byrne”) filed a four-count complaint in this Court. (Compl.) Notably, only one count—a claim for

Plaintiff further asserts that the Defendant breached its duty of care to her by: (1) “failing to fix a hazardous condition within a reasonable time;” (2) “failing to adequately warn plaintiff of a hazardous condition;” and (3) “otherwise failing to exercise reasonable and due care under the circumstances.” The Plaintiff is seeking compensatory damages in the amount of two hundred thousand dollars, plus interest and costs.

On January 11, 2017, I signed a new lease for 4807 Coachmans Dr. #8 Orlando, FL 32812. I signed it in good faith that you would keep your word and fix the master bedroom toilet, which was never properly fixed, and the kitchen light, both of which has not worked for 170 days as of February 1, 2017. I had asked you to please get these 2 issues taken care of by January 31, 2017; your reply was that you would contact your handyman.

First of all, she has to prove that defendant owes her a duty of care. It must be reasonable foreseeable that Ms. Smith’s goods could be damaged or stolen by the carelessness of the building management. And, even if that was foreseeable, there might not be any policy considerations that would make it unfair to impose duty of care. When Ms. Smith proves that building management has to properly maintain locker premises and provide a decent security, she can move to the second step. She has to prove that the defendant breached the standard of care. Since Mr. Johnson didn’t provide enough security to the locker and acted less carefully, the standard of care was breached. The standard of care is based on the Reasonable Person Test , which means that Mr. Johnson must had acted in the same way that a reasonable person would act in similar circumstances. This means that Mr. Johnson had to provide security measures in order to keep Ms. Smith’s goods safe. Next, Ms. Smith has to prove that the harm was caused. Ms. Smith has to prove that she would not have suffered a loss of stolen goods but for the defendant’s carelessness. If she will prove that there is at least a 51% chance that the Mr. Johnson’s carelessness caused her loss, then the court will award damages for all of that loss. Finally, Ms. Smith has to prove that that type of harm she suffered was a reasonably foreseeable result of the defendant’s carelessness. This can be proved by doing a remoteness test. When

Fair wear and tear of the property is usually accepted without having an onerous repairing obligation by excluding the tenants from the responsibility of ‘making good “the ravages of time”. A defence is available if the tenant can show that the use of the premises was reasonable; Manchester Bonded Warehouse v Carr 1980

Binghamton Housing Authority. It was six years after the completion of the Saratoga Terrace apartment complex when a child fell off the back porch stoop and received severe injuries. The parents of the child claimed that the contractor and owner were responsible due to their negligence in constructing the stoop without a protective railing. The court referenced back to the Campo v. Schofield case, which states, “We have not yet reached the state where a manufacturer is under the duty of making a machine accident proof or foolproof.” The court also noted that the complex had been used without accident for six years and that it did not conceal any dangers or defective work that would not have been found by a reasonable inspection. The outcome of the case proved that the pleading did not contain any allegation of a defect, and that the liability rested upon the parents of the child.

In this case a reasonable person would have warned others of there being a wet floor and in this case there was no sign. This is a negligent act causing Raj to fall and injure them self as a result. Had the staff member put the sign down to warn customers about there being a wet floor, Raj would have had not been hit by the child as he was walking to make a complaint.

Law Com No 238 [1996]: proposes that the landlord must keep the premises fit for habitation if the residential lease is under 7 years.

- The extent of the liability imposed on the tenant, whether the lease terms are confined to just the lease payments or whether the tenant is also responsible for repair/maintenance etc.