preview

Applying Sanitary Products For Australia 's Economic System

Decent Essays

My name is Sofian Miu and I am writing to you as a Queenslander and, I specifically, a woman who menstruates every month. As an abiding citizen I have paid my tax in order for Australia’s economic system to thrive. However, should my choice as a woman of being sanitary really be taxed and labelled as a “luxury”? The government may tax anything materialistic in my possession, but the government cannot tax my body. Periods are no luxury. No woman asked for a period. Women cannot choose to menstruate. Despite this, a whole heap of disadvantages have been created for those who do. By not using sanitary products, it can lead to a number of health risks; jeopardise maintaining a normal, professional or personal life; and result in public ridicule. However, it is apparent that the Australian Government disregards this and continues to tax a necessity while at the same time, not taxing condoms, sunscreen and lubricants (Gleeson, 2016). This issue is a worldwide problem that needs to be changed. In Queensland and elsewhere, the topic of taxation and sanitary products have caused an outroar amongst the female population causing much media attention and public debate; with previous reforms having been proposed by the former Treasurer, Joe Hockey (BBC News, 2015). However, said proposals have failed to be implemented and enacted. By using sanitary products, our Government capitalises on misogynist discourse and period shame that has caused us to fear our own menstrual cycles.

Get Access