Arbitrary And Unaccountable Power

One important tool for establishing freedom is a strong government to establish those freedoms. Without a strong central government we wouldn't be able to be provided with freedoms such as those in the bill of rights. That power of the government comes from the people. A government by the people means we have the rights to overthrow a government when it becomes to destructive and make a new government. When the governments were established they did not give all the power to just one group of the government, they separated the power by three branches so it wouldn't be abused by one. The three branches are Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. They have there powers and different thing they have to control. “The right of the people to be secure in their

The U.S constitution guards against tyranny through the separations of powers. This claim is true because the constitution was made in order to avert another tyrannical form of government from ever taking place again through the allocation of governmental powers. An example of the division of powers is seen in the Federalist #51 as the document states, “... the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments, & the portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments” (Doc. A). These direct words from the Federalist #51 basically state that the power of the government which is given by the people is divided into national and state powers and then furthermore divided into smaller sub powers.

Separating the power keeps one person from seizing control and becoming a tyrant. In order to make sure that the different parts of power don’t dominate, the Constitution applies checks and balances to insure all parts of power stay relatively equal. Proportional representation also gives all states a voice, and adds another blanket of security to the rights of the people. In present time, the government still relies on the Constitution to decide on many decisions. In over one hundred years, the United States has not had a tyrant, nor has the rights of the people been diminished. Therefore, it is shown that the United States plan of government may not be the best in all situations, but it absolutely guards against an abusive

“Give me liberty, or give me death.” We must diminish tyranny among our government. How did the United States accomplish this? After the Revolutionary War, the Founding Fathers decided to construct a government that was of the people, by the people, and for the people. By doing so, they needed to prevent the more than likely possibility of overbearing power falling into the hands of one or a few people, in other words a prevention of tyranny was needed (1769). This structure was stated in the Constitution, a written document that framed our American government, and so the Constitution declared four ways to prevent tyranny: Federalism, Separation of Power, Checks and Balances, and the Great compromise.

One way the U.S. constitution protects us against tyranny is separation of powers. A double security rises to the rights of the people. The government's control each other, but at the same time it will be controlled by itself. The National and State governments limit each other's powers and the powers are divided between them. If all the power is in the same hands then they will have to much and there will be a tyranny. James Madison said, “Liberty requires that the three great departments should be separate and distinct.” He talks about how the branches limit each other and that the powers are divided so one branch doesn't get too much. Separation of powers

The power of America lies within the heart of its people and the ability to have their voices heard. One of the best ways to accomplish this is through an electoral vote. By voting, the people of America or any Democratic country can control the route of the government and the decisions it makes. To decide if those decisions be new and current with society, or kept traditional is why such ability is granted under the 15th amendment. In addition, with voting behaviors determined by Democratic, Republican and

With the constitution the public can elect their representatives and president. The public chooses who lead and represents their states in the government. This empowers the people to elect the officials they feel will best suit their needs. The public can exercise they freedom of speech during elections to express their ideas.

Most people believe that the United States of America is a democracy, or a government run by the voice of the citizens. But this country is actually built on a slightly different principle; one that values the representation of groups more than the whole population as one. A country ruled by the choices of the majority could become an unjust and entirely undemocratic state. The framers of the constitution understood this possibility and worked to limit the power of popular majorities in order to have a fair and equally representative government. Chapter 2, The Constitution and Democracy, states:

Have you ever wondered how some people enact change? Mother Jones protested for child labor laws. Melba integrated a white high school in order to get rid of racism. Nelson Mandela joined South Africa’s congress to help racism. They all persevered to enact change, but they took different approaches for their problems.

Most change can be caused by people or something with significant value. Occasionally people forget that change can also be caused by pieces of paper. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was a law passed that primarily gave African Americans the right to vote without having to take any sort of literacy tests. African Americans were widely ignored in voting rights because they were forced to take literacy tests to be eligible to vote. Having this event in our nation’s civil rights movement was a landmark that allowed the other half of our nation’s voice to be heard. “The Voting Rights Act itself has been called the single most effective piece of civil rights legislation ever passed by Congress.”(Laney 65)

There will be college athletes to get paid. The NCAA has voted on the choice to let sixty- five teams from big power conferences, the ACC, Pac 12, Big 10, and SEC, including Notre Dame, would be able to make their own decisions on paying their athletes. “If you’re an athlete, going for zero to three-thousand five hundred dollars is in a lot better,” said Andy Schwarz, an economist who has done work for the plaintiffs in the Ed O’Bannon case. “But, it still misses the point entirely” (Schwarz). Athletes will start to be guaranteed the benefits that they deserve while being paid by these “Top five” divisions and will be able to pay for things like families of the athletes, more money in athletic health care coverage, and to pay for post season

The phrase, “We the people”, holds a lot of meaning to American citizens. As the first three words of the United States Constitution, it signifies a core value intended to act as a unifying factor in America’s democratic society: popular sovereignty. This is the idea of a majority rules, or to put more simply, the one with the most votes wins. The U.S. system of government relies upon the fact that the American people are capable of coming together to make informed decisions about matters that will ultimately better the lives of everyone. Despite this, however, there are certain instances in which a minority group will impose on or have more influence than the majority group. This phenomenon occurs all the time in politics, as politicians tend to regard the predilections of small groups of citizens as opposed to the general populace.

In order to effect this change, activists should conduct campaigns and rallies with the objective of engaging the public and drawing followers to their cause. The more followers that a cause gains, the more power it can utilize to get those people who hold positions of responsibility to conform to their desires. An example of this was near the beginning of this year when policymakers tried to subtly push a new cyber securities bill; known as CISPA, that was found to be very invasive and detrimental to the American

The first step to avoiding absolute power was making a separation of powers. Separation of powers was when the framers were concerned about tyranny, so they decided to split the government up into 3 branches so the power was divided. The legislative branch, which is Congress (House of Representatives and the Senate), is responsible for making the laws. The executive branch, which is the President, is responsible for carrying out the laws. The judicial branch, which is the courts, is responsible for interpreting the laws (Doc B). Since the government is split up like this, there is no way one branch could hold too much power, which means tyranny is avoided by doing this.

The President has a limited amount of powers but two of the strongest powers, in my opinion are; inherent powers and the power to veto.