Arbitrary And Unaccountable Power

One way the U.S. constitution protects us against tyranny is separation of powers. A double security rises to the rights of the people. The government's control each other, but at the same time it will be controlled by itself. The National and State governments limit each other's powers and the powers are divided between them. If all the power is in the same hands then they will have to much and there will be a tyranny. James Madison said, “Liberty requires that the three great departments should be separate and distinct.” He talks about how the branches limit each other and that the powers are divided so one branch doesn't get too much. Separation of powers

Have you ever wondered how some people enact change? Mother Jones protested for child labor laws. Melba integrated a white high school in order to get rid of racism. Nelson Mandela joined South Africa’s congress to help racism. They all persevered to enact change, but they took different approaches for their problems.

If the president is corrupted he can be impeached for the greater good. With the constitution the public can elect their representatives and president. The public chooses who lead and represents their states in the government. This empowers the people to elect the officials they feel will best suit their needs. The public can exercise they freedom of speech during elections to express their ideas.

The first step to avoiding absolute power was making a separation of powers. Separation of powers was when the framers were concerned about tyranny, so they decided to split the government up into 3 branches so the power was divided. The legislative branch, which is Congress (House of Representatives and the Senate), is responsible for making the laws. The executive branch, which is the President, is responsible for carrying out the laws. The judicial branch, which is the courts, is responsible for interpreting the laws (Doc B). Since the government is split up like this, there is no way one branch could hold too much power, which means tyranny is avoided by doing this.

Everyday millions of people are enslaved, used, and abused in one of the greatest civil rights violations in human history. Modern slavery; better known as human trafficking, is currently spanning the globe and affecting millions of people in hundreds of countries but is widely ignored by society. According to

The University of Texas at San Antonio Connecting the Political Dots: How Level of Education Affects Political Party Affiliation Marcos D. Madrigal II Final Draft Pol. 270.003 Professor Effanbee Ayala Introduction The power of America lies within the heart of its people and the ability to have their voices heard. One of the best ways to accomplish this is through an electoral vote. By voting, the people of America or any Democratic country can control the route of the government and the decisions it makes. To decide if those decisions be new and current with society, or kept traditional is why such ability is granted under the 15th amendment. In addition, with voting behaviors determined by Democratic, Republican and

The U.S constitution guards against tyranny through the separations of powers. This claim is true because the constitution was made in order to avert another tyrannical form of government from ever taking place again through the allocation of governmental powers. An example of the division of powers is seen in the Federalist #51 as the document states, “... the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments, & the portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments” (Doc. A). These direct words from the Federalist #51 basically state that the power of the government which is given by the people is divided into national and state powers and then furthermore divided into smaller sub powers.

Separating the power keeps one person from seizing control and becoming a tyrant. In order to make sure that the different parts of power don’t dominate, the Constitution applies checks and balances to insure all parts of power stay relatively equal. Proportional representation also gives all states a voice, and adds another blanket of security to the rights of the people. In present time, the government still relies on the Constitution to decide on many decisions. In over one hundred years, the United States has not had a tyrant, nor has the rights of the people been diminished. Therefore, it is shown that the United States plan of government may not be the best in all situations, but it absolutely guards against an abusive

Most people believe that the United States of America is a democracy, or a government run by the voice of the citizens. But this country is actually built on a slightly different principle; one that values the representation of groups more than the whole population as one. A country ruled by the choices of the majority could become an unjust and entirely undemocratic state. The framers of the constitution understood this possibility and worked to limit the power of popular majorities in order to have a fair and equally representative government. Chapter 2, The Constitution and Democracy, states:

The President has a limited amount of powers but two of the strongest powers, in my opinion are; inherent powers and the power to veto. The President is able to do a lot more than only what the Constitution says. This expansion of power is probably beyond what the Framers envisioned.

In the United States, the people matter. They are free, and can control what happens in government. The people have certain rights that allow them to do things that make them people, for example, thinking, speaking, and acting. The Founders of the US wanted to protect people’s basic rights as much as possible through the constitution. The Constitution explains, in great detail, that the people are sovereign.

The founders of our government created the constitution which provides checks and balances in the system so that one branch does not have dictatorial power. They created a format that protected the citizens from allowing to much power in one person hands. By creating three branches of government they foresaw the potential for a tyrant and with that they put checks and balances on the executive branch of our government. The framers of the constitution set up the separation of powers, this was effective because it allowed others to question decisions before they were carried out. In the constitution each citizen over a specified age can vote, so if you're unhappy with the policies or the direction of our government then you have the right to vote the

When I think of the differences between power and authority, I immediately think of the presidential cabinet. His cabinet has the authority to provide information and advice to the president but at the end of the day, the President has the power to make the final decision. The government does not have complete power over the people in part due to our civil liberties but they do have authority over us when we make mistakes. The traits of authority sometimes comes along with intimidation. When a police officer pulls us over we have our Miranda rights that can protect us from self incrimination, but once we are in trouble the law has the power to determine our punishment. The benefits of having power is that no one can tell you what to do and

The first thing we must do to maintain our rights is to have a strict system of checks and balances for members of government. The Declaration of Independence shows why we need a system of checks and balances. The Declaration stated that England’s government was corrupt and had gained too much power. Checks and balances would have prevented anyone in the government from becoming too powerful. This is the reason why the founding fathers made America a democracy, because then the people would have the power, not just one person. The Constitution states that each government branch has set things they can and cannot do. In order to make

The phrase, “We the people”, holds a lot of meaning to American citizens. As the first three words of the United States Constitution, it signifies a core value intended to act as a unifying factor in America’s democratic society: popular sovereignty. This is the idea of a majority rules, or to put more simply, the one with the most votes wins. The U.S. system of government relies upon the fact that the American people are capable of coming together to make informed decisions about matters that will ultimately better the lives of everyone. Despite this, however, there are certain instances in which a minority group will impose on or have more influence than the majority group. This phenomenon occurs all the time in politics, as politicians tend to regard the predilections of small groups of citizens as opposed to the general populace.