preview

Architectural Bias

Decent Essays

Difference in Architectural Recognition due to Historical Bias. As Winston Churchill once said “History is written by the victors”. When looking into past events there will always be more than one side to a story, yet for many centuries the study of history concentrated on the retail of an specific person or group who would generally impose their own ideas and perspective of the past. This creates something called historical bias which in term makes most of the historical documents fallacious. Architectural history is no stranger to this trend; since most of of our records come from Western historians (Greek, Roman, European). Western movements and architects are depicted as artistic and influential architecture while Eastern architecture is rarely credited or talked about. The Ottomans had equally significant contributions to architecture development thanks to architects such as Koca Sinan (1538-1588). While western architects such as Michelangelo are commonly known as some of the greatest architects of the century, …show more content…

First, he would designs a dome baldachin inside a square roof that would serve as the center of the build. After that he would just let the building take form from the dome.On the other hand, Michelangelo would have have highly planned designs that would focused on the symmetry and the artistic beauty. As Dogan Kuban said “ What the classical orders are to Greek, Roman, and European architecture generally, the dome baldachin is to the Turkish”. (Kuban, 73). Sinan highly tectonic style originated an entirely new design process in which space is created from the support systems rather than a floor plans. Michelangelo is greatly acclaimed for his designs particularly in comparison to other architects that worked during the renaissance but his mannerisms designs “singularity” could be compared to Sinan's understanding of functionality and structure through the use of roofing systems, specifically

Get Access