Are Cell Phones Dangerous to Your Health?

As the world grows larger, society is adding more technology. Cell phones have taken over the lives of many people. In most cases, people are either using their phones to pay bills, use social media, or to talk to someone in a quick way. Children have been impacted by cell phones along with adults. The users of cell phones have become blind to the negative effects that they have on a person’s health and attitude. The use of cell phones can greatly affect social skills, cause the development of hearing and eye problems, and cause an increase in stress levels.

People know brain cancer can be a very scary disease. Use your cell phone with care. Studies have shown that people who use their cell phones on a regular basis have higher chances of getting a brain tumor, which can later develop into cancer, is 240% higher then someone who stays off the phone. Cell phones give off radioactive waves which attack brain cells. The primary cause is still unknown, people still try and fins ways to prevent it. Avoiding

“Although there have been reports of negative health effects from low levels of radio frequency energy, these reports have not been replicated or confirmed” (Childs, 2009). However, “research and anecdotes have suggested a number of other means by which cell phones may adversely affect health – and possibly not in the way we might think” (Childs, 2009). These health issues can be bacteria caused by not cleaning their cell phones that can be treated with antibiotics. It was also found that cell phone showed a significant deterioration in the quality of driving a vehicle. When walking and talking on a cell phone their attention to traffic is lowered and they stand the chance of getting hit by a car. Another health issue is to the thumb from texting, causing sores and blisters. Those users with allergies to certain metal can have additional side-effect in the form of contact dermatitis. The noise-related side effect to the ear from using an earpiece with a high volume, this is easily remedied by just by turning down the volume.

-Some people have claimed that phones could be the cause of cancer and other sicknesses, especially for kids.

A cohort study done in Denmark, concludes that there is no connection between long term cell phones use to chance of cancer (Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1). There is not enough evidence to create a connection between tumor growth and cell phones use. “However, experimental data supporting a promotional mechanism are scanty.”(Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1). So yes, there have been some forms of evidence to prove a connection of cellular phones to cancer, but there is not enough evidence to completely prove it. A connection of cellular phones to cancer is difficult to make considering there is a significant amount of variables to consider such as time and SAR of the

In issue 8 of our text beginning on page 135, Olga V. Naidenko and Linda S. Erdreich debate the issue of health effects of cell phone usage. Naidenko states that cell phone usage does cause cancer, or at least that more research should be done about longer term usage than what has been done previously. Erdreich opposes the idea, stating that studies have shown there are no long term health effects of cell phone usage (Easton, 2010. p. 135-147). I feel that Erdreich is correct in her review of scientific studies, and that cell phones are generally safe for everyday use. That being said,

Technology in our country is constantly evolving. One of the most popular technologies used every day by billions of people are cellphones. Cell phones have created a huge impact in the way that we communicate, research, and spend free time.

Like phones, there are studies being conducted on cancer being caused by extensive tablet use.

Radiofrequency radiation from a mobile held against the ear will heat the brain, even though exposure limit for radiation from mobiles is low. According to Stats Canada, in 2006 there were 16.8 million cellphone users in Canada. Since few

According to scientists, cell phones were marked as “possibly carcinogenic.”(Trottier 1 ) In other words, there may possibly be a link between the use of cell phones and cancer. However, too little time has passed to detect if cell phones can cause cancer, researchers found no evidence of a link between the two and there is no evidence from studies that radiofrequency can cause cancer. Continuous evidence is showing this question as a false claim.

Human brain cells interact with one another through electrical impulses, which can be identified by using EEGs. When the phone is pressed against the head for a long period of time the part of the brain closest to the antenna is where the activity increases more. The sensitive areas on the body are the ears, the head, and the stomach. Dr. Rong Wang said that, “Short-term cell phone exposure has not been shown to cause brain tumors, research shows that it can change brain activity in ways we don’t understand yet.” There are a lot of tests and studies that have been done on whether or not cell phones cause brain tumors and give people brain cancer, but the results are inconsistent with each other. Some studies say that phones do give people tumors and others say that people are fine using their phones and shouldn’t worry. Ian McCloud explained the phone radiation in an excellent way. He said, “Imagine the brain is a tree and the radiation from the phones is a small breeze. If there is a constant breeze it will not ever be strong enough to knock over the tree, but if you had hurricane winds,

The article is designed in such a way as to leave a strong impression on its readers. The title has high impact and is likely to leave the average reader the impression that cell phones do indeed cause brain cancer. Although both sides of the argument are explored within the media article, it is leveraged in a way that the first impression, which matters most, is that there is a link. However, readers who look at the article more carefully will realise that different scientific groups have different opinions, and the article itself does not provide an opinion, nor is there a general consensus.

Cell phones are quickly becoming the primary form of communication in America. They have become more and more compact and complex throughout the years. Although they can be somewhat overwhelming, a cellphone is a practical device which can be used for many tasks. For a lot of people, cellphones take the place of an alarm, calendar, an address book, camera, and anything else you can think of. Because of cell phones, our generation has strayed away from any of the other means of communication, such as writing letters, emailing, and even face to

The title of the chosen article is Has the incidence of brain cancer risen in Australia since the introduction of mobile phones 29 years ago? by Simon Chapmana, Lamiae Azizia, Qingwei Luoa, Freddy Sitas. The link to the journal is https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2016.04.010 . The research question being investigated is if there is an increase in brain cancer from mobile phone usage in Australia. As mobile phone uses in Australia has increased rapidly, there is a popular hypothesis that associated mobile phone uses to brain cancer. This article is written in order to prove or disprove this hypothesis.

Cell phones emit radiation as long as they are working. Radiation travelling as waves. The shorter the wavelength, the higher the frequency, the greater the exposer to the radiation. When the energy is high enough, the radiation can displace electrons from atoms and mutate cells (Hui& Elise，2015). The radiation they emitted is the same as microwaves, television, laptops. It can penetrate into an adult’s brain about 4-6cm（ Schuz et al，2016）. Some people are negative with the cell phone’s safety, believe that radiofrequency(RF) radiation-the type of radiation that cell phones emit; can cause DNA damage, tumor growth, and also can decrease fertility(procon.org， 2016). They said the period of cancers to develop may take 20-30 years while cell phone user may take 10 or less years (procon.org，2016).