Are Single Sex Schools Better Than Co Ed?

There are many pros and cons about going to a single-gender school along with, a co-ed school. In the passage “Single-Gender Schools Make the Mark” And the passage “Co-ed Schools are Here to Stay” It is very difficult to make up your mind and pick your opinion. Many people thought that single-gender schooling was wonderful and they were here to stay, But that was not correct. I believe that co-ed schools are great for not only the students, but a great adventure for the teachers too.

It is no secret that, in general, boys and girls differ in their learning styles. Capitalizing on these differences could advance classroom performance. With on-going concerns about student success in school, any changes in the classroom that could increase student achievement should be considered. Recognizing the learning differences between boys and girls, one of the changes that could be instituted is single-gender classrooms.

Students will have to strive to be better in the classroom. Principal Jill Rojas states that “girls are more apt to answer questions aloud” in the classrooms when the teacher ask them. She also states that “Girls are learning to be more academically competitive and the boys are learning to collaborate.” Mrs. Rojas says that she likes to turn classes sessions like math into games because her boys “like competition.” So with the girls learning to be more competitive they are going to feel that they have to put forth more effort to be better that the other girls. If you have boys that are competing against each other in the classroom, they are always going to strive to be better that the other which will help the teachers teach them more. Yes, students need to learn to cooperate with the other gender, but single-sex classes allow students to thrive to be better in

In this paper I am going to try to persuade you that same-sex high schools promote educational success. Single-sex education is an old approach that has recently gained new momentum. When we think about single-sex education, we tend to think just about private schools; however, there is a new push to create same-sex education in public schools as well. There are several arguments and statistics I will use throughout this essay to show you how same-sex education compares with co-educational atmospheres and why I believe that more states and schools should offer these learning atmospheres. I will also share the results of a survey I conducted that

There is a vast region of differences set in how girls, and boys learn differently; with schools using this information they are able to empower and better educate their students. Peter Meyer makes this a key point to bring up in: “Kathy Piechura-Couture, a professor at the Institute for Educational Reform at Stetson University in Deland, Florida, has studied children at the Woodward elementary school in Deland, which has had separate classes for boys and girls for three years. She concluded that boys and girls are different enough that they demand, or should be offered, separate schools. "We looked at gain scores and concluded that there is a significant difference for boys when put in separate classes," says Piechura-Couture. Over the years, she explains, other researchers have discovered a significant number of differences between boys and girls that affect their learning abilities at any given

Students in single-sex classrooms tend to believe that they can achieve their goals and are unafraid to be competitive (Kennedy). Most single-sex schools have very relaxed disciplinary procedures, so the students have the freedom to express themselves. These schools tend to have less discipline problems, because they aren 't competing or impressing the opposite gender (Sharpe).

The driving force to this surge is the recent research which shows that natural differences in how males and females learn. Putting this research in practice, however has prompted a heated debate that goes beyond the pure academics bringing in play the civil rights, political, socioeconomic and legal concerns. The debate helps us understand the sides to take as its shows the cons and pros of single-sex education system.

Boys and girls learn in two different ways. This reason is why having a single sex school is more rewarding than a co-ed school. According to Dr. Schlosser of Breckinridge County Middle School's (Kentucky) the difference between the way boys and girls learn are the type of weather boys and girls prefer.) Boys prefer to learn in a cool, dark room. When there are two different people wanting two different things its hard to please both sides. Boys also learn much slower than what girls learn, this could be a problem for girls in the same class as boys for girls would learn and to move on, but would have to cut back their learning to wait for the boys to learn the same material. Boys also are interested in different subjects than what girls like. Boys are most secretly interested in music, science, and math. According to GreatSchools.com says boys feel girls won’t like them when they know they are interested in other things such as music and math and not baseball, football, and soccer. Many boys won’t show interest in music in a co-ed school. When boys are placed in a single sex school they won’t have the feeling of impressing girls so more boys will show their interest in arts and music. Boys are much better with math and science than what girls are says NASSPE VIII. NASSPE Vlll is single-sex school out of Huston Texas. "The most profound difference between girls and boys is in any brain structure per se, but also in the sequence of

Next off single gender schools help preserve many different cultures. In the Islamic or Muslim culture the co-ed schools are "promoting illicit relationships, teenage pregnancies, dating, girlfriend-boyfriend culture, extravagance where both sexes throw their parents' hard earned money on materialism and luxurious items to attract the opposite sex" (http://defence.pk/threads/co-education-spreading-immorality-among-youth.269207/). The co-ed

In single sex schools boys and girls excel in subjects they usually would not. Single sex schools help children do well in subjects they usually would not be good at or subjects they would not usually try. For example girls do better at maths and science in all-girl schools; boys do better in languages and the arts in all boy schools. My first example to backup my point is a study by Cambridge University in 2006 where their research showed “boys improved in english and foreign languages in single sex classes, and girls improved in maths and physics. This proves girls and boys do better in subjects they usually would not do because they are more comfortable in a single sex school rather than a co-educational school. A second piece of evidence to help argue my point is a United States study that found boys at single sex

In a traditional setting, boys and girls are mixed and learn together in a classroom. The traditional setting offers pros, like the preparement for real society in which these genders will continue to mix. A non-traditional setting will produce non-traditional results in which children may better their education. Single sex education with specialized styles for each gender, an example of a non-traditional setting, are beginning to show evidence of a better fit for students. Instead of a single male dominated classroom, separate rooms with different teachers may show better results in academic potential. A wide range of evidence shows certain conditions benefit females more than males and vice versa. The opposite gender can also be

There are strong claims for and against single-gender education around the globe. Despite extensive research in developing effective teaching practices for boys and girls separately, there are fundamental similarities between meeting the educational needs of girls and boys. There are more commonalities between the two than there are dissimilarities. Boys and girls seem to elicit different kinds of teaching they need due to the constraints that social norms put on each gender. For countries with European roots in their culture, this is also true. Although certain sex-linked characteristics are biologically inherent, how one learns is not dependent on their gender. Both girls and boys are relational learners, educe the kinds of teaching they need and find greater meaning in lessons they find interesting. It is not what sex individuals are born as that dictates what kinds of teaching methods they require, but rather it is how they are designed by their environments that shape their needs. This is particularly true for girls; and even more so for girls of color.

Is same sex education more beneficial? In 2006, only about four percent of the freshman class of Chicago’s Urban Prep Academy was able to read at grade level. But, in May of 2011, one hundred percent of the senior class had been accepted to four year colleges/universities, many receiving full scholarships. (Novotney, 2011) This was the first all male public charter high school in the United States. The fact that this school was same sex education is the main factor that brought one hundred percent of these seniors success. In today’s society, there is usually no distinction between same sex education and co-education. However, there is a distinction. This distinction is that same sex education is more beneficial to students. Society today does not realise this, even though there are many factors that prove it.

Single-sex education is mainly observed in most private schools which is a new approach being adopted by some public schools. The National Association for Single-Sex Public Education made an estimate of around 400 public schools that offer a form of single-sex education. The main force for the adaptation of the education system is due to the researches that have been carried out recently that show the natural differences in the learning of females and males. This has sparked endless debates on whether single-sex education actually boosts academic success. Making the choice of the type of education for children by parents is among the most crucial decision, therefore, the need to look at both sides of the coin. In the past century, the single-gender schools were perceived to be advantageous for learning due to the different styles of learning and the little distractions that are brought about by the opposite sex. Single-sex education is a traditional and old approach that should be left in the past. A research published by Penn State University in 2011 shows no evidence that the single-sex schools give positive effects as compared to the coeducational schools (Stanberry).

To conclude, students learn better in single gender schools. This is because it is easier for students to concentrate, this makes it less complicated for students to learn. Another reason is because boys and girls are academically different, so in a single gender environment, teachers can focus on how that specific gender learns. Lastly, students feel less pressured in single-gender environments. This is because they feel less pressured on how they appear to others and learn how to love themselves for who they are. That is why students learn better in single gender