Are We Worth The Cost Of War?

As citizens of the United States of America we must pay taxes to the government. The government takes these taxes and distributes them among different areas to fund each are; one of the highest percentages of spending goes to defense. The whopping amount of around 610 billion dollars makes the United States’ military the largest in the world, so large that its funding out-weighs the next seven highest spending countries. The problem with this is that the military does not really solve the large amount of very important domestic affairs; in fact we barely see the fruits of it. There are many reasons why we should cut down on the percentage spent on defense and focus more on other areas.

The ideas behind anti-war interpretations mainly stem from fear and devastation. Without a doubt, death is a result of war. The death of soldiers is a mournful but often unavoidable effect. Soldiers give their lives every day in service to their nation, and this fact often causes civilians to view them as heroes. But delving more into the topic of loss, many are unaware of the civilian lives taken by a war. It is not uncommon for victims of war to be used as pawns (Why is War Wrong). Innocent civilians can be driven from their homes, abused and beaten, and their towns are often burned and destroyed. Even more shocking to some is the fact that they are sometimes forced into the fighting by government officials (Why is War Wrong). “How could there be a way to justify this?” is often asked. Another negative effect of war is the economic burden. Yes, war does breed an environment where economic stability can be achieved through peace; however, the serious amounts of money used in fighting a war are often overlooked. Vast amounts of money are used in training for soldiers and military officers. Without the right type of training, officials would not have the necessary means to fight, and many wars would be over before they begin. Money is also used when devising and manufacturing weapons and machinery. Modern weapons and protection methods are extremely costly and greatly deepen a war

War-- a horrific way of justifying our actions and the innocent lives that have been lost, but on the other hand has resolved some of the greatest conflicts in history. Not every issue ever raised in this world is resolved through negotiation and discussion, rather sometimes war becomes a necessity for countries to settle disputes. War is a part of how a society strengthens itself politically, socially, and economically however, ultimately it becomes a country’s abusive use of power.

War leads to oppression and leaves negative implications on all people and societies by impacting the poor, women, children, and nations as a whole. "War is a state of violent conflict between one or more groups" (Rasenberger 3). Rasenberger defines war as a state of conflict between one group within itself or several groups in combat with each other, what is not mentioned are the after-effects of war. War itself leads to many civilian and military deaths, an estimated 1.5-3.8 million people died during the Vietnam War and an approximate 500,000 people died in the Iraq war. The biggest tragedy of War is that it always results in fatality, but another key, negative, factor to understand is that after the War many adverse implications arise. Post-war ramifications in the nation fall upon the poor, women, and children, making them weaker and less motivated leading to the downfall of a society. Regardless if a nation wins or is defeated in war they have to deal with consequences of war and find solutions to the impacted people and society. It is essential to understand that there is never a true victor in war because regardless of the outcome, fatality and a fall of morale within society on both sides are inevitable. War has often been the solution to situations that required force or violence, but in recent times this has

When people talk about war it tends to be a sore subject. Although I stated what I thought on the outlook of how the war tells the story of those whose lives were lost in it the outlook on war can vary an unlimited amount. My first reasoning on my argument is that war consumes those involved. By involved I mean anyone who has been directly

Is the cost of war worth it? In order to answer this question, we need to determine the true cost of war. Is the cost the number of deaths? Psychological trauma? Is it possible to put a value on the cost of war? War has brought many injustices into this world from Stalingrad to the Holocaust. However, good things emerged as a result of it. World War II brought economic growth and the development of new technology. Does benefits of the war outweigh the consequences? War brings conflict that negatively affects countries and people through both direct and indirect strife.

Dating to the beginning of civilization, war continues to be a repeating occurrence in the world whether it be with oneself, society, or the outside influences in the world. In terms of war between countries, there is the growing controversy over its utilization and purpose when a country is predisposed to a situation foreboding unavoidable conflict. War is the only solution to certain situations but cannot be considered a panacea to all the issues prevalent in the world. The reasoning behind this is that war produces consequences some of which that are permanent. War has always spawn more conflict, gives disfigurement to human bodies, death and occasionally affects the state of one’s mind in areas such as mentality, emotions, rationality

Aristotle once said “we make war that we may live in peace.” That is true. All wars have been fought because people feel that peace has been lost, and they want to obtain it. Whether it be about land, rights, religion, or government; people fight for peace. Edwin Starr’s song lyrics are wrong, because war can be beneficial. The benefits to war are that it frees people from oppression and gives the country and soldiers a unifying ideology and a sense of national pride.

Throughout history, war has always been described as an atrocity and an unnecessary reason for the loss of life. This is not the case. War is necessary for the survival of the economy, the sustainability of non-renewable resources, and the progression of inventions.

As soon as an American soldier steps onto the battlefield, they are quite aware of the fact that this very moment might be their last. Despite this impending danger, they continue on, willing to sacrifice their life to fight for their country. Willingly sacrificing a life is no small feat. It takes serious courage and an intense love for a country for one to volunteer their life for its sake. Now, the question is: Why? What does America possess that is worth sacrificing lives to preserve and protect?

The essay, “The Truths About War and its Impacts”, written by Mallory Matia hits the source of why humans go to war. Matia used all strong points to talk about that have unlimited sources of information. Matia has four main points that she covers in this essay. Matia goes into detail about how war is a craving for humans, how it can help economic growth, environmental stability, and how it affects someone morally. Matia’s ideas are strong, and she uses her sources to help back up her information, although there is some general things Matia said that could have been expanded on.

Although I have learned some things about Russia and the late 1800’s and early 1900’s this book taught me some new information. When Nicholas’s son was diagnosed with hemophilia ( a disease when the blood doesn’t clot properly) I noticed that they didn’t have a treatment or cure for it. Today, hemophilia still can’t be cured but, the treatments are: help from a specialist, medications, and supportive care. I think it is interesting how our medical world has developed from then to now. Another thing I found interesting was how during the late 1800’s how the government was controlled under the form of autocracy, when one person ( the tsar in this case) holds all power. I couldn’t imagine living under the rules of someone having no power, unlike

War should not be used just as an excuse to settle arguments. My claims are, firstly, war involves mass killings and is unethical. Secondly, war destroys economies. Thirdly, war has a negative impact and ruins the lives of children. Lastly, war can only be justified when it can be proven to be a necessity.

War is controversial, unfortunate, and certainly misunderstood; it is a transforming agent, a catalyst for change. Nonetheless, many people focus on war's negative consequences, while positive effects are downplayed. War is a necessary evil in the sense that it stabilizes population, encourages technological advances, and has a very high economic value. Without war, the overpopulation of the human race is inevitable. It is this reason that war is a useful tool by not only Mother Nature, but also humans themselves to institute population control.

Wars are expensive (in money and other resources), destructive (of capital and human capital), and disruptive (of trade, resource availability, labor management). Large wars make up severe shocks to the economies of participating countries. Despite some positive aspects of short-term stimulation and long-term destruction and rebuilding, war generally impedes economic