Argical Essay : Why Guns Should Be Banned?

We need to own guns for self-defense or else the deaths of people will increase. Also, there are several recreational activities which require guns to be used. Sporting clays, target shooting, bowling pin shooting, and trap are four commonly activities which require firearms to be utilized. Banning guns would just spoil somebody’s hobby, which could be those recreations. A final reason is that crime is reduced according to a few reports. One in 1998 stated that the percent numbers for crimes decreased to low numbers. Another one talks about a commissioner not stating gun control for the solution to reduce crime. These three reasons eliminate the point of banning

Gun violence kills 33,000 Americans and injures over 80,000 people per year. It is ridiculous how much damage guns have brought to not only us, but the world itself. From Columbine, to Sandy Hook, to the movie theatre to the Oregon Community College shooting, it has just been ridiculous. This is all because we in America believe it is okay for people to carry guns and for them to be used if “needed”. If they were always banned to begin with, we would never have had this problem. The private ownership of handguns should be banned in the United States. Handguns have been proved to be dangerous to society in recent events, they are the deadliest weapon in America, and lastly, guns cost Americans hundreds of extra dollars that could be avoided if they were banned.

To begin with, guns give people a fighting chance to survive and protect others against criminals. “10, 2014 Pew Survey found that 57% of people believe that owning a gun protects them from being victimized” (Procon.org). Who would ever want to die without having the chance of fighting back. Taking away guns from Americans can cause more deaths to those who have no protection.

The general argument made by author Shiha Dalmia in her work, “The Case Against Banning Guns” is that instead of trying to ban all the guns in the world, we should try using different methods to reduce the amount of harm weapons sometime cause. There are roughly 300 million guns in this country, which means there is nearly one for every man, woman, and child. With about 300 million guns in circulation, it would be nearly impossible to ban all of the weapons in this country. The topic of banning guns is a very controversial topic because not everyone who owns a gun is going to use it to harm other people, he or she might be using that weapon for hunting, gun shows, maybe even to symbolize something that is meaningful to him, or if worst comes to worst, use it to protect himself and his family incase an intruder were to enter his home.

Guns have been used throughout history for war, hunting, and protection. Since then, the killing capacity and speed of guns has improved dramatically. Guns have been a part of American culture from its roots. However, as times have changed and guns are no longer a necessity, gun control has become increasingly urgent to prevent unnecessary crime and killings. Guns should be banned for everyone but the law enforcement and military. Guns should be banned to prevent mass shootings and lower crime rates, while being supported by history and the constitution.

Personally speaking, the fact that you have the right to own a gun in your own home makes me feel a lot safer. If there was an intruder in your home and you call the cops, the cops might not get there in time, but if you had a gun you’d be able to subdue the intruder or control the situation a lot better, than just hiding and hoping the cops get there soon. If we do ban all guns, how are we supposed to protect ourselves if someone illegally gets a gun off the black market, which is quite easy, you can’t just pull out a knife and say “put the gun down,” you’d get shot.

My greatest argument for banning guns, is that is has worked in other countries. In Australia once guns were banned, the violence dropped by 50%. A counter to that would be

With guns people are able to keep their families safe and even be able to scare off burglars or attackers just by simply brandishing a gun. With a gun in the home you don’t even have to fire because burglars or intruders are more scared of seeing a gun and will leave as quickly as possible. In fact, 74% of felonies say that they would stay away from people’s homes when they are home because they are scared to get shot. Even studies say that children feel safer at school when armed guards are in the school with them. If there was an outlaw of guns, criminals would still be able to get guns as they do now and innocent families and people who can’t own a gun will be on a the threat of getting shot more. A background check and mandatory of time would help stop criminals and possible tragedies.

First off, I think there should be a limit on how many guns one person can have. Guns are definitely not a necessity, so having a multitude of guns is uncalled for. Secondly, I think that if there are kids under the age of 15 in the house, the guns should have to be locked up at all times and unloaded. This one simple rule could stop the terrible stories we hear about little kids accidentally finding a gun and firing it because they thought it was a fake toy. Lastly, I think that if we stopped giving people numerous locations where they could access guns easily, many people would have fewer guns. We should only make guns available for purchase at specific gun shops. This means not rewarding people at local banks with guns and other unnecessary stores.

Some say that guns should be banned, but people like hunters or gun owners disagree. Instead of banning them completely, the government can just strengthen the gun laws. Guns should be a privilege and not a right for people who use them incorrectly. People should prove that they would be responsible with guns by undergoing mandatory training, knowing how to safely keep them locked away, and practice gun ownership properly.

What many people do not understand is that guns are not the problem, people are. Evil people cannot just be legislated away, so why try to make laws against the most dependable line of defence for citizens? Outlawing guns would automatically make anyone who owns a gun a criminal, and if only criminals have guns, how are we to stop them? No one is forcing anyone to buy a gun, so why should we force people to give them up? It is the duty of an upstanding American citizen to uphold the rights of the

Taking guns away is not going to solve any problems with gun violence. If criminals want a gun they will find a way around the ban and buy a firearm illegally. Taking firearms away would violate our second amendment rights taking away the ability to defend your home and your family.

In recent years nearly 35,000 people have been killed annually by guns in the United States.  These deaths include 15,000 murders, 18,000 suicides, and 1,500 accidents.2  It is because of these statistics that many would like to ban guns altogether. But is that

Gun ownership should be banned to reduce the 100,000 deaths of americans that are shot every year in the United States. Throughout America’s history, we have been known as the extremely gun violent country unfit to protect our citizens from danger. The television news reports continue to display the violent crimes and school shootings that has harmed innocent people especially children. When the government allows guns to be legal in the United States, they are giving people the responsibility to use this weapon for self defense purposes and recreational sport such as hunting. However, gun owners have been unable to handle this responsibility

Guns are needed. The main purpose is for protection. People think that by banning guns Americans will be safer. This is not true though. Criminals get their guns through illegal ways so it would be hard to confiscate all the guns. With guns taken away most Americans would probably turn on their government. Some people want to ban guns because they are used in crimes. But the guns are not committing the crime people are.