preview

Argificial Performance Of Fingerscanner

Good Essays

After performing various experiments in order to test the computational performance of FingerScanner to validate its viability. First, the performance of the communication system was measured to obtain the response times. Then, the behavior of the different components of the system was analyzed in depth. Fig1.1 Setting the software control panel Fig1.2 Swiping, Enrolling and Saving Fingerprint to disk Separating the results into three different categories. URIs, which only access the SQLite DB, URIs that also communicate with the scanner device and finally, URIs with human interactivity: SQLite (GET domain/fingerprints, GET domain/fingerprints/id): the response time of the SQLite database is very fast. Response time of the overall …show more content…

Although the overall assessment was satisfactory, there is room for improvement. In general, we can say that the system client-server-device communication worked properly. 1.2 Fingerprint scanner Analysis The table below shows the successful tries of the principal scanner processes, Identify and Enroll. In both operations, the number of successes in the last try is quite high compared with the first attempts. The efficiency of the scanner is in the 60%–70% range. But, the scanner behaved accurately as long as the fingerprint occupied almost 100% the scanner area and it was pressed hard enough. The results reached the same conclusion after repeating 10 Identifications and 10 Enrolls. Tab1.2 Identify and Enroll tries Routine 1stTime 2ndTime 3rdTime Identify 2 6 16 Enroll 1 4 14 Another test was to identify the finger occupying less than 50% of the scanner area 10 times. The fingerprint scanner could not pass the test, it kept failing to identify on any of the 10 tries. When there was a failure, the scanner always sent back an error packet message. 1.3 Prints Running in the Raspberry The default browser in the Raspberry called Epiphany browser has been evaluated in this part, the windows system on the Raspberry has to be executed jointly with the browser. Fig 28 shows the CPU and Memory usage when the print application of the Epiphany browser is executed in the Raspberry. Fig1.3 CPU and Memory Usage when the print is executed in the Raspberry When

Get Access