Argument Against Light Pollution In Paul Bogard's Let There Be Dark

Research from the World Health Organization,American Medical Association, NASA, and Earth's ecology, help the essay be more persuasive and makes the author more reliable. Bogard uses the first two sources in order to show how "...darkness

contrast between the polluted place where the reader is, and the beautiful green place full of

In the second paragraph, Bograd gives us a rundown of what he thinks, or feels, about the changing sky. He tries to connect the audience's everyday lives to his facts. He uses logos and ethos to persuade the audience with evidence. In the third paragraph, Bogard explains what the “World Health Organization classifies working the night shift can cause human carcinogen”. By illustrating this to the audience, Bogard appeals to ethos, logos, and pathos. The facts are

Bogard states that “To much artificial light at night spells trouble for all”. Appealing to the readers emotion by listing all of the health problems we develop with “short sleep and “long nights”. Bogard is persuading his readers stop using artificial light at night.

In his essay, Paul Bogard argues that it is necessary to preserve darkness. Paul is trying to persuade the reader to take his side and help him achieve his goal of saving natural darkness. To do this, Paul uses tons of rhetorical devices and appeals to emotions while also providing facts and studies to support his argument. His main weapon though, is the way he talks to the reader. His tone is what makes his essay an effective one.

In Paul Bogard’s “Let There Be Dark”, he emphasizes the lack of natural darkness due to artificial lighting. Bogard uses personal accounts, effective word choice, and the three appeals to urge us to find a solution in order to allow our future generations to be exposed to the natural darkness of the night sky.

In the essay, “Our Vanishing Night”, Verlyn Klinkenborg discusses light pollution. Light pollution is due to human’s use of artificial light during the night. Klinkenborg uses examples of how this type of pollution effects not only humans and their biological clocks, but how it effects other organisms in the wild. In this essay, I will analyze the author argument and aspects of it that includes authority, topic, tone, context, exigence, and audience to determine whether the essay was effective or ineffective in getting Klinkenborg’s argument across to the reader.

In the persuasive essay “Let There Be Dark” by Paul Bogard, the author addresses the issue of light pollution being a serious problem worldwide and offers some ideas on how people can reverse this epidemic. Bogard uses all three persuasive strategies, logos, pathos and ethos. The use of these strategies within his writing help to strengthen his argument. He uses pathos by evoking several emotions throughout his paper and telling the audience that the Earth’s ecology would collapse if darkness continues to disappear. This makes the audience really think about what our future would be like if we continued to let light pollution happen. Another strategy he uses is logos and the use of facts. He explains that organizations around the world are voicing

Author Paul Bogard in his writing “Let There Be Dark” he talks about the importance of preserving the natural darkness. During this new era of advanced technology where there is light everywhere, he wants us to see the benefits and the importance that the natural darkness has. He adopts a confident tone in order to sound more credible to the audience. Bogard also uses parallel syntax and urgent diction. Throughout his writing, Bogard uses urgent diction to make the audience realize that preserving the natural darkness is very important.

Annie Dillard’s “Seeing” discusses the two possible ways to properly see things and relates them to light versus darkness in nature, and upstream versus downstream of a river. The essay explains that there are two ways to see things in the world; to look for something specific, or to let go of that desire to see something. Both types of seeing are also combined with either brightness or darkness and with either upstream or downstream. Dillard has trouble seeing anything in the upstream of the river because that part of the river is always dark or cloudy. On the other hand, she can see the animals in the downstream of the river, where everything is bright and lively. The river is split in two different symbols which help show the best way that one should view nature. The downstream and the upstream of the river have unique characteristics, and Dillard also compares them to darkness and light. By using powerful imagery and diction, Dillard is able to compare the two types of seeing and explain why letting go of the desire to see is the best way to look at things.

Gardiner Harris, a former expatriate who works for The New York Times, uses his article “Holding Your Breath in India” to recount his family’s unpleasant experience in New Delhi. Through doing this, Harris persuades the reader that, due to Delhi’s pollution, raising a family there is not only dangerous, but definitely not worth the risk. In order to convey his message to his audience, Harris effectively uses rhetorical devices like pathos, ethos, and logos, along with meaningful word choice in order to cause readers to agree with his viewpoint that heavily polluted areas harbor hazards that family members, especially children, should not be exposed to.

Annie Dillard’s “Seeing” discusses the two possible ways to properly see things and relates them to light versus darkness in nature and upstream versus downstream of a river. The essay explains that there are two ways to see things in the world; to look for something specifically or to let go of the desire to see something. Both types of seeing are also combined with either brightness or darkness and with either upstream or downstream. Dillard has trouble seeing anything in the upstream of the river because that part of the river is always dark or cloudy. On the other hand, she can see the animals in the downstream of the river, where everything is bright and lively. The river is split in two different symbols which help show the best way that one should view nature. The downstream and the upstream of the river have unique characteristics because they also compare to being darkness and light. By using powerful imagery and word choice, Dillard is able to compare the two types of seeing and explain why letting go of the want to see is the best way to look at things.

Another point that Bogard brings to life is that “our bodies need darkness to produce the hormone melatonin, which keeps certain cancers from developing, and our bodies need darkness for sleep. Sleep disorders have been linked to diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease and depression, and recent research suggests one main cause of “short sleep” is “long light.” By using information that touches on cancer and other disorders, Bogard creates a serious tone that concisely supports his beliefs on light pollution. With health correlation being used, there is a perspective of life or death that is seen if light pollution is not decreased. In spite of disagreeing ideologies, Bogard’s use of credible sources allows him to construct a powerful perspective that can be seen as fact rather than as bias.

Eales’s Ingenious satire presents how humans treat pollution as if it were nothing with words like “black smoke” and “rancid”. The cartoon depicts how humans only care about the money and not realizing that pollution is a humongous problem to society. Furthermore, Pollution causes Global Warming causing glaciers to melt and cause problems. This society doesn’t seem to give enough attention to what pollution is doing to our beloved world. Additionally, Humans in our world just want to get money and become prosperous, but being prosperous and spreading pollution is going to demolish our atmosphere. The two businessmen are just watching the world become a horrendous place. On the top of the pinkish looking skyscraper, the man on the left looks

In Paul Bogard’s essay “Let There Be Dark” he builds up an argument to persuade his audience that the natural darkness should be preserved. He first uses a personal story to allow the audience to try to connect to him so they will be more likely to agree with this topic. Appealing to the reader by adding imagery. The personal story also shows that the issue of preserving natural darkness is a topic that he is actually passionate about. Bogard uses great imagery making the audience picture what he saw and maybe make them want to experience it too. He also explains in his essay that the natural darkness isn’t just beneficial to humans but also to animals and the environment.