Argument Against The Common Definition Of Patience

1500 Words6 Pages
In this essay, I will argue against the common definition of patience. We can peek in various dictionaries, and find the word patience defined as being able to accept or tolerate waiting, delay, or suffering without becoming annoyed or upset. One might oppose patience by getting irritated, upset, emotional or anxious in the face of suffering. Dictionaries may alter this definition from one edition to the next, however, it all draws upon the idea that there’s something we’re waiting for. This results in the word patience relying on the future. The Buddha had the patience to sit in the face of suffering for 6 years before becoming a Bodhisattva. However, did he wait? “Do not dwell in the past, do not dream of the future, concentrate the mind on the present moment” (Buddha). The French sculptor Auguste Rodin claimed, “Patience is also a form of action”. While enlightened thinkers realized the virtuous depth of patience, numerous people don’t. I inquire its time to study the virtue of patience in a different way and redefine what it means to be patient. Understanding the reality of what patience truly means, can remind us how significant being patient can be. Especially in the time period we live in. There are a growing number of distractions that can inhibit our patience. Today, it seems that people inherently become restless or upset when a web browser takes an extra 5 seconds to load. People often become angry over a text message taking too long to send. Everywhere we turn,

More about Argument Against The Common Definition Of Patience

Open Document