Argument Essay: Euthanasia And Assisted Suicide

Assisted suicide is a topic that has ignited a severe debate due to the controversy that surrounds its implementation. Assisted suicide occurs when a patients expresses their intention to die and request a physician to assist them in the process. Some countries like Oregon, Canada, and Belgium have legalized the process terming it as an alternative to prolonged suffering for patients who are bound to die. Unlike euthanasia where a physician administers the process, assisted suicide requires that the patient voluntarily initiates and executes the process. Although there exists concession such a process is important to assist patients die without much suffering, there has emerged criticism on its risk of abuse and as an expression of medical

On November 1, 2014, twenty-nine year old Brittany Maynard ended her life. However, she was not suicidal. Brittany had a rare brain cancer and was given six months to live. She decided it would be better to die peacefully then to spend her last months suffering and to die a painful death. Brittany, like other terminally ill patients, opted for doctor-assisted suicide. The idea for doctor assisted suicide, or voluntary euthanasia, has been around for a long time, and studies have shown that the ancient Greeks and Romans tolerated it. In 1870,Samuel Williams wanted to use chloroform to “deliberately hasten the death of terminally ill patients,” according to Wikipedia. Today, it is legal in some countries, US States, and

Admittedly, many health care professionals are against assisted suicide due to different right to die laws in different areas. However, education can be provided by state government to educate their physicians on what the laws and policies on assisted suicide in their state include. Providers could be educated on the laws and policies of assisted suicide in their area as well what goes on in a procedure so they can get a better understanding of the certain choice of dying. In a study done in Canada where health care providers were interviewed on their responses to patients’ desire to control the dying process instead dying of natural death, it was found that “the nurses and physicians in this study did not prove to be particularly knowledgeable

Assisted suicide brings a debate that involves professional, legal and ethical issues about the value of the liberty versus the value of life. However, before conceive an opinion about this topic is necessary know deeply its concept. Assisted suicide is known as the act of ending with the life of a terminal illness patients for end with their insupportable pain. Unlike euthanasia, the decision is not made by the doctor and their families, but by the patient. Therefore, doctors should be able to assist the suicide of their patients without being accused of committing a criminal offense. This conception is supported by three points of view. The first point defenses the autonomy of people, which covers the right of people to make decision

Assisted suicide, a huge political controversial topic in our American society today. Assisted suicide is an illegal practice for doctors to partake in. It is illegal in most of the United States and I believe it should stay that way.

What if you were terminally ill, had no hope of getting better, and only had months, maybe even weeks, to live? Would you want the option to end your life early? This is the option of assisted suicide. Assisted Suicide is “suicide of a patient suffering from an incurable disease, affected by the taking of lethal drugs provided by a doctor for this purpose” (Dictionary.com). Assisted suicide should be legal in the United States. If you are terminally ill and have no chance of recovery you should have the option to end your life earlier. No one wants to suffer, it’s an awful and unbearable thing. Giving people that option will help take away some of the suffering and help them die with dignity. The people opposed to assisted suicide say it is unethical to kill a person though wouldn't making someone suffer be much worse.

In Idaho it is illegal to ask for physician assistance to aid in ending one’s life. Assisted suicide is very controversial in today’s eyes. This law came into effect all the way back in 1828 first announced in New York. Today in Idaho it is banned, that took effect in 2011. This policy has been seen in two totally different aspects. Many believe that it is wrong to give up and quit life, but the other side believes that this gives someone a right chose. I believe this law should be passed in Idaho it will help save families money and not force people to suffer.

Assisted suicide is becoming a widespread topic among elderly and terminally ill patients in America. It straddles the line between having the moral right to choose to die versus the ethical decision to maintain life at all cost. Through modern medicine is having breakthroughs with lifesaving procedure and medications on a daily basis, we are now posed with the question “Does Society have a moral obligation to protect and preserve all life?” We can talk about dignity and respect or even the person’s right to choose but in situations where we are under duress, we can make hasty decisions involving our lives. I believe that all lives should be perceive as precious and no one should have the right to assist someone with ending their life.

There is not one person in my world who likes to talk about death. Death equals loss, sorrow, departure, eternal and with it brings grieving. No one knows what happens after a person dies. Some believe in the afterlife, as do I, and some believe there is nothing. I personally like to believe there is something more waiting for us and there is a reason for our existence. Which tends to bring comfort. However, that does not mean that I want to die. But, on the other hand, if I was terminally ill and suffering from a terrible disease like an incurable form of cancer or a progressive disease like COPD and was given six short months to live, then yes, I would want to opt out rather than feel myself slowly die day after

“Dogs do not have many advantages over people, but one of them is extremely important: euthanasia is not forbidden by law in their case; animals have the right to a merciful death.”

So long as they’re truly mentally ready to say yes to Euthanasia. My position makes sense simply because when I say that I support assisted suicide, I envision my loved ones and even me, maybe wanting this procedure to go through in the future for ourselves, who knows. What I do know is that I wouldn’t want to see my family leave this world knowing that there was something that could have been done to help them pass away in dignity and hopefully even peace, willingly of course. To support my claim, the author of Euthanasia Respects Individual Anatomy and Requires Deliberation, Mars Cramer, writes about how his wife’s choice to get assisted suicide was the right decision for both of them, but most importantly for his wife as she was constantly having to go to the hospital to no means end. He also writes about how him and his wife were supporters way before Euthanasia was legalized, because they strongly believed that they had a right to leave this world through assisted suicide. This article supports my belief in which both the author and me agree that Euthanasia should be legalized so if there were ever a chance in which we or our loved ones need it, it would be at our disposal, no questions asked. After all, we all have a right to our own life as it was given to us

In society, we associate suicide with a mental disorder such as depression. According to the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, in 2015, 44,193 people were reported to have committed suicide. "50% of all people who die by suicide suffer from major depression." Because these numbers are so great, it can be seen that the legalization of euthanasia would significant increase the number of people committing suicide.

Firstly, one of the main arguments for euthanasia is autonomy and patients’ rights to make their own decisions.

The central argument of those supporting legalisation of euthanasia is the right of individuals, often in unbearable pain, to choose where and when they will die.

There are many benefits of resorting to euthanasia, one of them being that it ends a patient's suffering. If a patient has a terminal illness and are in pain, they have the right to decide if they want to end their suffering. “It is hard to deny the right of an 85-year-old with terminal cancer of the pancreas and almost no family and friends left, to commit suicide or ask for assisted death” (Niekerk). If a person is suffering alone, with no comfort from friends and family it can be hard for them to cope. With nobody to turn to for guidance or care, they should have the right to decide if it is time for them to die. That individual, and only that individual should decide their fate. What makes people believe they can tell other how to deal with pain, or how to live their life? Any person should be able to decide their fate, because nobody can feel what they feel and nobody experiences pain like they do.