The ultimate price that unborn babies pay for not being recognized as a citizen is being aborted. They are not granted human rights at conception, and therefore do not have the right to keep living. Just because they do not have a voice, their life is being innocently taken way too soon. In 1973, the Roe vs. Wade court case made it legal for abortions to be performed in the United States. Since then, the issue has been debated in every way: politically, religiously, scientifically, morally, and ethically. But, the fact of the matter is, a person is a person no matter how small. People of all different beliefs need to realize that a fetus is a human just like everyone else. Once everyone can realize this maybe some sort of conclusion or agreement …show more content…
This person is a citizen of the United States, and consequently is granted rights, specifically the right to life. To deprive a fetus of their right to live is to deny the world of one great human being that could positively contribute to society. First, the facts of science prove that conception creates a human being right away, then it keeps gradually developing for 9 months after. Also, lawmakers are able to use laws for illegal immigrants to allow them to make their baby a citizen of the United States even though it isn’t actually born there yet. If this is allowed to go on then who is to say that I cannot happen with babies actually conceived in the United States. The prejudice against women and African American shows that America has denied human rights to people in the past, and unborn babies are just thrown in with the trend. Hopefully this passes and people realize that unborn babies are actually humans just like the women and African Americans. Frederick Douglass would stand by the idea that unborn babies should have the right to life because he was denied the same rights when he was a slave. Continuing, the Catholic church has put up a mighty fight against pro-choice using scripture as the basis of their argument. In the end, abortion is stripping babies of their potential. It ends the life of a human being that is alive and thriving in the whom of their mother. John Locke’s
Since the Roe v Wade (1973) case, over 58 million pregnancies have been terminated. Many pro-life supporters have tried to get the Supreme Court to overturn the case because they feel as if the fetus should be covered by the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution which states that all citizens born or naturalized in the United States have the right to citizenship. Pro-life supporters consider the fetus living, just inside of a different body. Having the case overturned will make abortion illegal and that would cause many problems for many women such as losing the rights to control their body. Although many people feel as if women should not have the right to terminate a pregnancy because there are people in the world willing to adopt a child, abortion should be legal because some women are unprepared for a child due to income, mentally unstableness as the aftermath of a rape, or judgement based on their religious beliefs.
The act of aborting a fetus deals with a very complex definition of what a human life is. As Alan Keyes says, “Whether a life is a human life, entitled to respect for all the basic, inviolable rights of humanity – this is a critically important judgment.” No one person has the
Many argue is it the women’s or the foetus’ rights and values that are being trampled on? “Pro-choice movements sometimes fall back on an abortion rhetoric that seems to dehumanize and trivialize the death of a foetus as a way to humanize and make important the reproductive rights of women.” (Wolf p54) “Women can treat an unwanted foetus as a violation of her civil rights and is therefor justified tin using force to expel it” (McMillan pA12) The decision is not up to the mother because she is not God. Only God, the ultimate creator has the right to choose who may live and who shall die. Humans do not have the right or the power to control the quality of life and to avoid suffering. “The issue of abortion is not just life, but how life is created and the extent to which human intention and control the process, both before and after birth.
Abortion is often debated as a women's rights issue or as a rights issue for the unborn. It is neither. It would be wrong to protect women's rights by simply ignoring the case for the unborn; and it would be wrong to protect the unborn rights by simply ignoring the case for women. The issue is not who has rights; both sides have some rights, or at least considerations to consider. The issue is not who
The topic of abortion and its legality is one that is strongly felt on both sides of the issue. This is one of the most heated arguments you can get into and if I am being fully honest I am a little nervous about publicizing my view point. But here is my research and arguments for whether abortion should be legal or not.
Once we grant that the unborn are human beings, it should settle the question of their right to live. The one-time choice of abortions robs someone else of a lifetime of choices and prevents him or her from ever exercising his or her rights . (Alcorn, Randy) There are seven characteristics that define life. Responsiveness to the environment, growth and change, the ability to reproduce, a regulated metabolism and oxygen flow, maintaining homeostasis (the ability to regulate internal bodily functions in response to external changes), composed of cells, and the capacity to pass traits onto offspring. Pre born babies possess all seven characteristics that define life. (Human Coalition) "The science is clear, human babies are conceived in the wombs of human mothers, and those pre-born human beings are alive at the moment of conception." -Dr.
Abortion is a serious topic that people have been debating about for years. Everywhere you turn the topic of abortion presents itself, on TV, in the newspapers, in books and magazines. It already has, and will continue to cause, controversy for years to come. As long as abortion remains legal, pro-life advocates will continue to protest what they believe to be these horrible acts of murder.
All humans have the right to life and unborn babies shouldn’t be an exception to that same right to life. Many people try to say that it isn’t a baby, it is a fetus. Yes, Fetus is the correct term but a fetus is a baby. If you don’t have a baby/ human growing inside of you then you aren’t pregnant, therefore you don’t need an abortion. If the baby is outside of the womb and is killed by someone it is considered to be murder. Murder violates a person’s right to life. So if babies who have been born have the right to life, then shouldn’t the unborn baby have the same right; because before the baby can be born it has to grow inside the mother’s womb. Therefore if we abort babies, we are killing a human being which violates the given human rights stated in our Great Country’s
In the article, one of the points brought up is that abortion is not murder, as the fetus is not yet considered alive, therefore it doesn’t deserve the same rights as a human outside of the womb. However, it is believed by many that life comes at conception, or when the sperm fertilizes the egg, as cited by Marjorie England in their book Life Before Birth. When fertilized, the human has a genetic identity, giving it a right to life. Along with this is people using the scientific definition of life, which is “the condition that distinguishes animals and plants from inorganic matter, including the capacity for growth, reproduction, functional activity, and continual change preceding death.” Some aspects a fetus does not include, meaning that it isn’t considered alive. However, the latin meaning of fetus is offspring, not potential human. Along with this, a unborn baby is considered a human baby by the US government from the Unborn Victims of Violence Act. Killing a fetus is the same as killing a birthed baby, and it is people’s responsibility to understand that, just like it is their responsibility not to have unwanted pregnancies.
I believe that it is a woman’s choice whether to keep her child or not. I don’t think that anyone should interfere with the choice of the provider of the baby. Abortion is a popular topic in the debate world, but I strongly believe it shouldn’t since at the end of the day the woman is liable for her child. In this article, an unknown writer wrote, “The fact that a fetus may or may not have a beating heart, developing neurological structures, identifiable digits, or any other human quality does not equate abortion to murder. All embryonic organisms resemble a developed version of said organism. Additionally, a fetus does not have the mature, necessary neuroanatomical system required to feel pain until 26 weeks gestation. Not to mention,
There is a growing debate on whether abortion should be banned from being used. There is an argument going on between the political parties in office. The Democrats seem to agree that abortion should be used if needed. The Republican party seem to completely disagree with Democrats, they say that abortion should be banned from being used in America. This problem seems to affect women the most because, they feel that they should have the right to decide if they want to have the child or not.
Abortion is murder even if the unborn child is not fully developed yet. The pro-life group believes that life begins for a reason, and everyone has a life for a reason. By the US Government's abortion is considered murder. The baby is still human, and still has the right to life and its own freedoms. Abortion is not an excuse for convenience, it still will affect the aborters life. It could possibly make the aborter psychotic, or suicidal at certain points after going through and completing it. The individual has the right to a fundamental life, which must be protected. An act also states that an unborn child is a ¨member of the homo sapiens.¨(“Abortion ProCon.org.”). Approximately 38 others states have passed similar fetal homicide laws in the United States.
The fetus cannot possibly have rights because the fetus cannot be determine as a complete human and no statics can back up 100% when human life begins without a doubt. We all assume we know but we don’t. It’s our own opinion; therefore, we cannot determine the laws and rights on our opinion but we can determine it on the fact that the mother is a human begin and has lived up the life. Besides the fetus depends on the mother at all time during the pregnancy and after birth. The mother is the one who is going to have to feed the child, clothes the child and change the child’s diapers. The child could not possibly do all of those things by itself; therefore, the child depends 100% at all times on the mother. That is why the mother deserves those rights and need safety procedures if she decides to
No man or woman should have that power to decide if a baby is allowed to live or not. When a woman decided to have sexual intercourse, she is taking a chance of being pregnant whether it’s done with protection or not; it’s still her responsibility. After the sixth weeks of pregnancy, the baby's heart starts beating and the brain is forming. On the seventh weeks, the baby's fingerprint started to form, which can show that the baby has an identity, a heart and a mind of his/her own. (Storck,
Furthermore, let’s examine what this country was founded on, our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence states that "All men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." Which part of this says all rights except for that of unborn Fetus’s? It clearly states that All have the rights to life.