Argumentative Essay: Keep The Voting Age

Some people argue that by allowing younger teens at the age of 16 to vote would only show the lack of civic responsibility the the young teenagers in this society have today. By allowing that it would not help, but only hurt the voting society more. Another thing that would not be benefit the counrty by lower the voting age would be that the percentages would remaine low for the participation of younger voters. Studies have shown that a small percentage of young voter from the ages 18-24 voted in 2012. This shows that young teenagers do not vote at all which supports my opinion on why we should keep the voting age at 18.

After reading both articles on the voting age, I believe the age should remain 18. I dont think changing the age will help with the voting turnout if anything it will hurt it.

In my position I agree to lower the age of voting to 16-17 years old because it can raise up the percentage of voting. Many people are not voting because they don't believe it can help them and their community also with the support from 16-17 years old, it can show a huge difference on how the votes are increasing little by little. Also it can gives them experience on what's the voting like. Once they get older, they will know what to do because they registered the vote in an

The 26th Amendment granted 18 year-olds the right to vote and since then there has not been much voters. It is said that 18 year-olds typically go to the polls in smaller numbers than their elders, so how would decreasing the voting age to even younger people really make a difference. Fred Schults

By lowering the voting age from 18 to 16 some people suggest improvement of voter turnout. On the other hand the problem is that by doing this there would be a decrease in the participation percentage. Most of the younger people would not take the time to vote; much less take the time to understand what they're voting for.

They state that we need to balance the overwhelming older voters with younger perspectives and to do so is to make it so voting is more available at a younger age. I agree that we do need to balance out the younger and older voting demographics, however, lowering the age to vote to 16 years old will not solve this. We can already see in the United States' case that younger voters will not vote and are simply uninterested in doing so, so why should we lower the age so more uninterested teenagers have the unlikely possiblity of voting. I think we shouldn't focus on making voting more available to increase voter participation, but instead we should make it so they want to vote more

There are many concerns that might be brought upon if Congress chooses to lower the voting age in the U.S from 18 to 16. Many could assume that 16-year-olds are not competent enough to make mature and informed decisions. They could either choose to not vote or vote the way their parents tell them to vote. There have been past issues with lowering the voting age in America from 21 to 18. Dissatisfaction among many people could cause a huge conflict if lowering the voting age to 16. Although, we must weigh out the pros and cons of lowering the voting age. This will possible affect the voter turnout in a positive way. For those who vote earlier in life can possible develop a habit of voting in the near future. As of right now, we have a low

Secondly, if the age group was lowered it would allow children at the age of 16 to become more interested in the political aspects of the country. For example, parents would be able to educate their children on the importance of voting, explaining what it means to cast your vote and the effects it could have on them during the present and future. Elderly people, above the age of 65, typically are the deciding votes because they understand the importance of electoral involvement.

The long debate over lowering the voting age in America from 18 to 21 always been a big issue. It began during World War II and became greater intensified during the Vietnam War. That’s when young men denied the right to vote, and they have to fight for their country. There is a big debate about what age you should be able to vote. It’s been a long going issue that nobody has really came up to a conclusion with. I personally think that the voting age should be changed from 18 to 21 because 18 year old are not mature enough, at that age they do not know what and who to vote for, and they have no real world experience.

I think that lowering the age to vote would have a bigger turnout then keeping it at 18. The only thing to disprove this argument is, ( younger voters show a lack of civic responsibility). Athough 16 is a young age to vote , it does not mean they dont have a clear openion on how they want to live. If you think about it, two years later their an adult and now living their life with a presadent that they had no say over.

In the United States the voting age currently is 18 years old and now there are those that wish to lower the age to 16. If the goal is to increase the percentage of the pouplation voting there are better ways of doing so rather than lowering the voting age two years. Doing so would only be waste of time, energy, and resources.

The controversy over lowering the voting age is a difficult one. While lowering the voting age will increase the number of voters, it is not guaranteed to increase the percentage of participation. We must also consider the fact that younger voters tend not to vote. Another concern is the involvement of young adults ages 16-18 in politics. It is not common that these teens follow politics and think about who would be a good leader for their country. Lowering the voting age most likely will not help to improve voter turnout or participation or turnout. We need to work toward increasing the participation of the existing voters.

Lowering the voting age would make a better turn out for how many peope acctually participate in voting.

. I personally don't feel the legal voting age should be changed in any way. When an individual turns eighteen they are able to make an informed decision. If the age was to be lowered, I feel the younger voters would be influenced by their parent or other authorative figures the individual looks up to. However, it is shown in "Keeping the Voting Age at 18", that younger voters tend to be less involved in voting. Which shows that if the age was to be lowered, it more than likely wouldn't affect the outcome of the vote. However, if the age was to be lowered, that would create more room for misinformed votes. Which in the long run would affect the outcome of the campaign. I also feel that to vote, one must understand the intentions of the person

To begin, as an eighteen year old American citizen, I believe that the voting age, being 18, should stay that way. Now that it is 2018, I truly do not think that anyone younger than me or even my age has the common knowledge to vote. I stand on this for three reasons; the age group of teens from 16-18 only really know the bare minimum about our government, no one in this time period will go out of their way to vote, and our voting percentages are already low in the United States. The voting age should stay the same.