Argumentative Essay: New Drone Law In Schools

The purpose of this research paper is to show how unmanned aerial vehicles, better known as UAV’s or drones infringe on the Fourth Amendment and Due Process of the law.

This ruling will undoubtedly become more important as states and municipalities consider bills that would hold harmless property owners who may damage a drone flying over their private property. The current presidential administration’s public

Imagine yourself sitting in front of the tv watching the news and all of a sudden the breaking news cast interrupts the regular news. You hear that there has been a school shooting at the school your kids attend, and you automatically start frantically calling your kids to see if they’re ok. What if we could avoid this feeling of no hope and eliminate the fears some students have of going to school? Would you take action? Gun control has been a very controversial topic over the past few years due to the increase of police violence and school shootings. This increase of violence should be a clear indicator that gun control is needed in our country. If gun control was implicated in states all across the U.S., school shootings will be prevented, gun control will have finally been tested, and the people of America can finally have the safety they desire.

The U.S government started using unarmed drones in 2000 to monitor Afghanistan when the country was at war. The drone program was expanded when the September 11 attacks happened as a way to counteract the terrorists. Drones were used a surveillance but this time most drones are armed with missiles to weaken and destroy terrorist groups power. The death toll from the expansion of the program, according to the human rights group Reprieve, found that in 2014 that US killed 1,147 people in Pakistan and Yemen in the course of targeting only 41 men. This has caused a debate on whether to continue to use drones or to destroy the programs. A large amount of

In this article Bart Jansen presents a highly objective viewpoint about how the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has begun regulating drone operations across the nation. Commercial and personal drone use has been on the rise over the past decade, with the military being among the first to begin using remotely piloted aircrafts (RPA). I believe that the FAA is completely going in the right direction with the regulations that are being set in place. As an active duty aviator, I can account multiple instances where drone sightings abnormally close to or on military bases have led to elevated advisories for flight operations. I can only assume that busy commercial airports have to take even greater precautions after sightings of low,

CQ Researcher’s article entitled “Domestic Drones” centers on the problems that ensue from the flaws in unmanned aircraft safety. Domestic drone use has expanded from the past few years to an array of firefighting and police surveillance to scientific research and aerial photograph. This expanded use, however, provides several security concerns, including a possible invasion of privacy and relaxed consequences of misuse. The debatable question here is whether drone surveillance by police should always require a warrant (McGlynn). By analyzing two opposing viewpoints on this topic through an in-depth observation of its use of logos, pathos, and ethos, this question can be addressed with professionally formulated perspectives.

In the Newsela story, A Whizkid: World's top drone racer keeps feet on the ground, eyes on future.

“Before you assume, learn the factor. Before you judge, understand why.”- unknown. Sometimes important things that we don't know about aren't appropriate. But that doesn't mean that we shouldn't know about it. In fact, in order to judge something, you have to know what you're judging. In this case, it's books. Books should not be banned only censored for elementary school because people should understand history, the different point of views; however elementary schools should have restrictions.

Students and teachers often think that school shootings could never occur in their school, but school shootings can happen anywhere. They keep happening with acceleration, which makes it more likely that it could happen at any school. Anyone who lives anywhere could shoot up a school, regardless of size. I believe the only way to slow school shootings from happening as often relies on protecting our schools with more security.

In 2012, terror struck an unsuspecting Sandy Hook Elementary School located in Newtown, Connecticut; Adam Lanza is the known perpetrator of committing the violent act on over 20 school children. The main problem was how Adam Lanza had obtained a gun even though he had countless mental illnesses, contributing to why he should not have been in possession of a gun (Vogel). Guns create problems and problems such as guns end in death. Since gun laws will put obstacles in the way of criminals, will not disturb the second amendment, and will have the possibility to save lives, gun control is an excellent solution for controlling crime; therefore, more gun control is needed.

“One could only hope that staff would not abuse power” (John Diamond, thirty years in law enforcement and administrator in schools for four years). School shootings have become very prominent in today's society. With the ever so high number of school shootings, the question of whether or not teachers should be armed has arisen. James Grayson, author of “More Guns On Campus Won’t Make Schools More Secure” found on Campussaftey.org, reports a South Carolina study determined that employees, allowed to carry firearms increased their risk of injury by five times. Teachers should not be armed; it is not beneficial to staff or students and not an effective deterrent in schools.

Some kids can't tie their shoes, but they can fire a firearm. There are so many parents that don't put away their guns. Toddlers are killing themselves and their parents. Adults should always have their guns unloaded as well as put away.

Quadcopters or also known as aerial drones has quickly becoming one of the most popular trends in video production or just as a recreational hobby. For videographers, quadcopters offers the ability to take incredible shots that could take days of planning and higher cost with a helicopter as done before drones. In response to the growing popularity, many people has concerns about the ability to abuse this device for privacy violation, and terrorism. Over the past 2 years there has been numerous news, articles, and blogs headlines expressing the unconformity of the US laws due to the negative potential of civil flight drones. I consider there is sufficient laws and regulations to completely cover the unacceptable use of aerial aircrafts like in the two of the amendments from the Bill of Rights, aircraft guideline modernization and the Patriot Act.

What does educational success mean? In the past, educational success meant that a student had acquisition of knowledge, skills of socialization, and was well rounded and prepared for the professional world by the time he/she reached the end of secondary school. Unfortunately, within the last decade or so, the meaning of educational success has slowly drifted to being able to test proficient in state standardized testing administered to students in public schools. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, promises parents that all children will have equal access to high quality education and schools will

In the United States, there has been some recent additions to the ever-growing list of laws that are imposed on citizens. In Washington State, and Wisconsin, the senate passed several laws to ensure that drones could only be used legally, if they are for government use. These new laws sound great, however, they don't cover privately purchased drones. In