Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing

Every year, a total of one million children die from pneumonia. If you multiply that number by one hundred, you will have the number of animals that suffer painful deaths due to medical experimentation in U.S. laboratories each year. This number includes animals of all types, from mice and rats to fish and birds. These animals are typically used because of tradition rather than actual scientific reasoning, making their deaths all the more cruel. Animal experimentation is not only unethical, but ineffective and expensive. It should be phased out and replaced with technological alternatives.

It is not ethical to harm any animal and one must not go against his or her morals. Scientists are often blinded by the negative effects against the animals. They are slit opened, poisoned, and tortured. Imagine being contained in an insufficient amount of area, chances are, you may often experience impaired brain development or anxious behaviors. Pre-experimentation conditions is not where it ends, animals experience harmful scenarios that occur in a laboratory. Often, animals are injected with conditions that a healthy animal may not be familiar with. Species of all kinds experience psychological reactions from drugs that are provided to them. Over the many, not just one, but many laboratories, monkeys are addicted to drugs, cats consist of holes drilled into their skulls, rats have their spinal cords crushed, and many indescribable conditions are forced into animals. It has been identified that an estimated 26 million animals are used every year in just only the U.S for research. Currently, the number of animals dead in experiments is unknown, as no attention is provided towards the issue. How heartless can the society

2015, p. 34). The vast majority of animals experience levels of suffering either because of the environment in which they are kept and or the procedures performed upon them (Healey, J. 2015, p. 34). In these experiments, animals could be subjected to a variety of tests including: injections; exposure to radiation; organ transplants or removal; inhalation of toxic gases; or forced to enter distressing environments in order to explore their reactions (Cruelty Free International, 2018). The purpose of these experiments is often to better understand the systems, functions or processes in which living organisms such as ourselves commonly perform. A survey of 987 British citizens revealed that 71% agreed that animal testing was necessary yet only 20% believed it should not be banned (Magee, C. 2016). A similar survey conducted in the United States found that 75% of the public approve of animal testing yet when public were told that these animals might experience pain or distress and re-asked the same question, less than 50% approved (Mcmillan, F. D. 2012). This raises the question as to what is considered humane? This illustrates the need for consistency in values perspectives in order to maintain the dignity of the animals involved in these

Furthermore, animals that are used the most in these experiments range from rabbits, mice, guinea pigs, and rats. These poor warm-blooded creatures are tortured and are manipulated such as testing for new drugs and being infected with diseases, injected with poison to measure the toxicity, chemicals that irritate and burn skin. Many animals don’t survive the prolonged exposure to these tests. With many dying before the experiments are ever over. Animals that do survive these harsh tests are ironically killed at the of the research.

Animal research has led to numerous improvements for the quality of life in humans and other animals. The humane treatment of animals requires that if there is an alternative way of getting the same results, without using animals, then that should be done. Reducing the number of animals used for research would result in an increase in humans being used for research; therefore, it is not reasonable to decrease the number of test animals. Humans cannot justify an objection to killing an animal involved in a biomedical investigation if they are willing to eat animals. The killing of an animal to meet the needs of human beings is judged as reasonable by most people. The enormous amount of benefits to human beings has made biomedical experimentation on animals justifiable. Non-human animals have non-negligible moral worth. Causing and animal to go through excruciating pain to bring a tinge of pleasure to a human is wrong. Believing there is a moral difference between evil we do and evil we do not prevent must be rejected to make the researchers’ calculations implausible. It is believed that perpetrating and evil is worse than permitting an

Firstly, during all the experiments, animal are deprived from food, their DNA is mutated, their brain is damaged, and in the end, they are murdered in many gruesome ways: poisoning, lethal injection, suffocating, etc. Each year, approximately 100 million animals in these kinds of experiments die just in the USA. It is an enormous and fascinating number. The major problem of this entire testing is that 94% of them fail. Thus, all of the animals’ lives are just wasted. It is quite shocking that nobody is taking any proper actions regarding this issue. Also, it is certain that animals also have a conscience, emotions and feelings like human. Experiencing this kind of suffering and agonizing pain would be unimaginable for any person. However, because it is an animal and it doesn’t have a lingual ability, the inflicting pain is acceptable and tolerable. It

But recently modern research has proved that animals don’t always represent as good models for human body. Computer modeling and in vitro testing are new methods that have helped in research without using animals, but animal experimenters believe they still need to test on animals to protect humans from harm. They don’t believe the predictions that computer model provides because they are not always accurate. Instead of experimenting on animals they should try to make these computer models better, so they could test how drugs and their targets work better and fit in the molecular structures of each other. In addition, many people believed most animal experiments are not helpful to humans, and they don’t contribute to medical research. These experiments are done on basis of curiosity. Many argue that they use animals so new drugs are not tested on humans. Even though multiple experiments are done on animals, the drugs are still tested on humans. Animals’ tests are so unreliable. In fact, there have been some cases where drugs were tested on animals and they didn’t show any side effects, but when the same drugs were used by humans they suffered serious side effects. For example, in the 1950s a drug named Thalidomide was tested on animals and was considered safe for the treatment of nausea in pregnant women, but later on, it was discovered that the treatment resulted in severe birth defects

These days, everyday items that we buy can come at a much different cost: animal experimentation. For so many years, animals were a crucial resource in furthering scientific research for human use. These human uses could be for make up merchandise, prescription and over the counter medication and how a disease makes an animal react compared to how a human has reacted. Even though some of these uses help further science, many of the tests conducted either are inhumane or simply do not work the same with humans.

Animals are used by scientists to develop research for new medications and experiments daily. The Humane Society is working to decrease the use of animals in laboratories by promoting the advancement of affective alternative approaches. Animal testing provides a useful model for treatments of diseases and possible cures. According to the US-based foundation of Biomedical Research, animal testing has made a major advance within the last century- for veterinary health and humans. The practice of using animals for testing has been debated for many decades. Is it morally right or wrong to use animals during experiments? Does federal law ensure that animals used in research are treated humanely? When considering the benefits of animal testing,

Perhaps one of the most controversial topics in the field of health sciences is the use non-human test subjects by medical research institutions. Animals used for experimentation can provide extremely important information due to their physical and genetic similarities to humans. The tradeoff to furthering the field of medical science is that often times these experiments result in pain, suffering, and death of the test subjects.

However, many don’t realize the torture that these animals must experience as test subjects that supposedly further human welfare. Discovering medical advancements should not be done at the expense of an animals’ life. Humans place the value of their lives over the values of animals’, because they believe that the animals are simply test subjects and that they don’t have any rights. In reality, animals do have rights and animal testing is in direct violation of those rights. Humans and animals are very similar, both having the ability to feel, think and desire. Humans can’t simply justify with the fact that killing animals is the solution to curing cancer. In actuality, it is extremely difficult to correctly compare information received in animal research to humans because of their biological differences. One of the main problems of concern is that the public are the ones who fund these experiments, through money from their taxes and even money from charitable donations. Medical research on animals needs to stop, humans and animals are

Every year, millions of animals suffer through painful and unnecessary tests. Animals in laboratories all over the world live lives of deprivation, pain, isolation, and torture. Even though vast studies show that animal experimentation often lacks validity, leading to harmful human reactions, we still continue to use this method of experimentation, while many other less-expensive and more beneficial alternatives exist. Going beyond the issue of animal experimentation being morally wrong, this form of research is also hindering medical progress. Although the use of animals in laboratories is said to be necessary for the welfare and health of humans, people mistakenly believe that this immoral and unscientific method of experimentation is

In my opinion animal testing should be continued. Some people prefer to test things on prisoners than on animals, but a human's life is more valuable than an animal's. Animals reproduce fast and humans don't. Rabbits,rats and mice are some of the animals that reproduce really fast. I personally eat meat so i'm basically killing animals for my own good, I wouldn't mind killing animals for my own safety. I would prefer that an animal gets hurt,of killed instead of a human being.

Animal testing, although a controversial topic, affects a great deal of scientists and the work force in the agriculture field. This topic has proven difficult to communicate to one another about because there are individuals that believe animals should have certain rights and others believe that animals have no rights. Our group wanted to research this topic because we want to gain knowledge and become more understanding toward the people on both sides of the spectrum. Digging more into the research we found that cosmetics, medical use, and food are the most widely used methods for experimentation. With these research fields, people are finding ways to appeal to the ethics of the modern-day consumer.

When most of us use cosmetics, or pickup a prescription from our local CVS, we very rarely consider how many animals’ lives were taken away and sacrificed to ensure product quality. As the topic is discussed widely between animal rights activists and the groups pro-animal testing, many people argue that the benefits of medical research outweigh the pain and suffering of animals. As I explored the perspectives of these groups, the pro and con lists widely ranged on beliefs, cultures, and ideas. Many pros being how the main focus group who have gained back their lives due to vaccines and medicines that have first been tested on animals. The cons however, being how many believe that animal testing is cruel and inhumane as innocent lives of animals who have no choice in the testing are being taken away by many of these tests. I think the biggest issues in this topic are that we are sacrificing certain lives just to try to save others, using the theories that humans are above the lives of animals just because animals can't stand up for themselves and have no choice in what they're being subjected to and have no say in whether they live or die. Animal research has led to amazing results in biomedical advances and product safety for human consumption. However, the human benefits do not justify the animals' pain and suffering, therefore animal testing should be stopped.