Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing

Most individuals would be saddened knowing that animals were being harshly experimented on for human benefits. The testing of animals is deemed to be cruel and inhumane. However animal testing has saved thousands of humans lives. Some believe the sacrifice is worth the gains, but others disagree and suggest other testing methods. Ultimately, the question that arises on many different occasions, is if animals should be experimented on, or not.

Hundreds of lives and millions of dollars have been wasted on research regarding human prisoners. The information gathered usually can’t be used because it is not reliable, and the tests done did not follow rules that were already in place. When scientists begin to take advantage of prisoners or abuse their rights, their tests become irrelevant. Since prisoners have little to no rights, scientists use them to their own advantage. Many doctors, before the Nuremberg Code and the Hippocratic oath were enforced, made advancements in medicine by these malicious acts. These people were hurt and tortured due to the things that happened before laws were put in place and enforced. Many other problems arose from testing on prisoners and some even continue to affect how studies regarding prisoners are done today.

Look at the tag of your shirt, where does it say its from? Now, does it say how many people it took to make it or how much time it took? Apply that same logic to when you buy shampoo. Does it say how many animals died when they tested the product? No, it does not. Companies and factories do this for a reason, they want us to be unaware of the facts. Within the next few moments I hope to enlighten you with information you may not know about animal testing.

Alternatives in animal testing has been a huge controversial debate around the world for years. Many researchers and scientists try to stray away from the term “alternatives” because to them, it suggests that no animals whatsoever can be completely replaced. 1 The CAAT, the Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, is based on the principles of the ‘3Rs’: replacement, reduction, and refinement. Replacement basically means the way it sounds, the animals are replaced by other methods not involving animals such as in vitro techniques, which contain human cells and tissue models that can imitate real life organs of the human body. Reduction and refinement, the other two Rs, means to cut down the number of animals used in a particular study

As a scientist opens the rusty cage door, the fuzzy hamster bolts to the very edge so that the scientist would have trouble getting the mouse out. The hamster squeals, cries, and shivers, as the huge hand wraps around its body pulling the hamster out of the cage. As soon as the hand releases the hamster, the scientist injects numerous amounts of chemicals into it. The chemicals are so toxic that the mouse lost its life instantly. Even though many researchers chose to use animal testing, that is one of the many ways of research. Animal testing should no longer be needed since there are better, alternative ways to research without harming live animals.

For my senior paper I intend on writing about the effects animal testing has on the animals themselves and the reasons behind it being illegal. Animal testing is the use of living animals for experiments and/or to perform tests testing the safety of a human product. My thesis will be along the lines of “Inhumanly treating animals with unnecessary tests for the use of human products that often lack validity, due to the different ways animals and humans react to certain chemicals and supplements, should be outlawed.” I will talk about the types of testing, the products scientist use and whether or not it is an accurate way of determining if the items used are safe for human use.

Argumentative Essay (Disagree) With the demand of cosmetics and skin care being higher than ever, it is exceptionally important that the condition of these products is safe for human handling. For years, the seemingly best way to achieve this level of safety has been to test on animals. Discussions on this topic include many fallacies and misunderstandings that persuade the general public to support animal testing. However, it is no misconception that a cosmetic item is not worth the degree of agony and suffering these species experience in these tests.

testing. Another article by PETA voiced, “We have moved away from studying human disease in humans. … We all drank the Kool-Aid on that one, me included. … The problem is that [animal testing] hasn’t worked, and it’s time we stopped dancing around the problem. … We need to refocus and adapt new methodologies for use in humans to understand disease biology in humans” (Peta). This has been the problem for years now, that problem is how inaccurate the results are. Also, how the medical groups keep on getting these false results and still will not change their ways.

An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the united States for scientific and commercial testing. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, check safety of products destined in human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and health care issues. Researching on living animals has been practiced since at least 500 B.C. Animal testing has enabled the development of many life saving treatments for both human and animals. There really isn't an alternative method for researching a complete living organism. Opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane to experiment on animals. The alternative methods available to researchers can replace animal testing, and that the animals are so different from human beings and that research on animals often yields irrelevant results.

Animals are used by scientists to develop research for new medications and experiments daily. The Humane Society is working to decrease the use of animals in laboratories by promoting the advancement of affective alternative approaches. Animal testing provides a useful model for treatments of diseases and possible cures. According to the US-based foundation of Biomedical Research, animal testing has made a major advance within the last century- for veterinary health and humans. The practice of using animals for testing has been debated for many decades. Is it morally right or wrong to use animals during experiments? Does federal law ensure that animals used in research are treated humanely? When considering the benefits of animal testing,

This raises serious ethical and moral questions about the use of animal experimentation. It is a matter of serious debate as to whether the use of living breathing creatures as tools to enhance our quality of life is morally wrong. Some argue that all use of animals in medical research is wrong, as all creatures

Animal experimentation has become a common practice among scientists around the world for various purposes, specifically including the improvement of human lives. With this in mind, to what lengths are we willing to go far enough to realize that animal experimentation is costing us our own humanity and compassion to the world around us? In the United States alone, there are over 100 million animals that are burned, crippled, or killed during in vivo studies in laboratories. In vivo is latin for “Taking place inside a living organism”. The studies inside living animals include various forms of animal experimentation that not only could be deadly but gruesome. Animal experimentation has gotten out of hand, and it

Should animal testing continue? One side will argue that animal testing should be stopped. Their argument point is that it is unethical; from being mistreated and the animal's experience with pain and fear. They would say humans and animals are not alike. Due to this animal testing can be inaccurate and cause mistakes. Sheree Stachura, who is against animal testing, stated that because of the difference between humans and animals there is a limit in what scientists can and cannot test. Those who oppose animal testing will say it is a waste of time for both species. As well as a waste of money and lives. They will also fight about how in today’s advance in technology there are different methods out there that require no harm to be done to any

In my opinion animal testing should be continued. Some people prefer to test things on prisoners than on animals, but a human's life is more valuable than an animal's. Animals reproduce fast and humans don't. Rabbits,rats and mice are some of the animals that reproduce really fast. I personally eat meat so i'm basically killing animals for my own good, I wouldn't mind killing animals for my own safety. I would prefer that an animal gets hurt,of killed instead of a human being.

Animal testing, although a controversial topic, affects a great deal of scientists and the work force in the agriculture field. This topic has proven difficult to communicate to one another about because there are individuals that believe animals should have certain rights and others believe that animals have no rights. Our group wanted to research this topic because we want to gain knowledge and become more understanding toward the people on both sides of the spectrum. Digging more into the research we found that cosmetics, medical use, and food are the most widely used methods for experimentation. With these research fields, people are finding ways to appeal to the ethics of the modern-day consumer.