Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing

Most individuals would be saddened knowing that animals were being harshly experimented on for human benefits. The testing of animals is deemed to be cruel and inhumane. However animal testing has saved thousands of humans lives. Some believe the sacrifice is worth the gains, but others disagree and suggest other testing methods. Ultimately, the question that arises on many different occasions, is if animals should be experimented on, or not.

“The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated” (Mahatma Gandhi). Scientists have been using animals for biomedical research for centuries. They provide a source to get information scientists can not get without harming humans. A lot of debate is spread about whether it is good or bad. Animal experimentation is a controversial topic because it is helpful to humans, but it is also cruel and inhumane.

Animal Experimentation has been dated as far back as to the Early Greek Era. This practice has been viewed as ethical by research scientists trying to find new medical breakthroughs. Yet, in recent years, the use of animals in research and experimentation has been frowned upon by animal protection groups and animal rights activists. Animals are protected by certain guidelines and ethics prior to their use in research. Contrary to popular belief, animal experimentation should be viewed on a positive note, due to the fact that it can benefit human life, reduce adverse effects on humans, and the cost is cheaper and easier.

Animal testing remains a controversial subject and objections have been present virtually since its beginning. Over the past decades, medical and cosmetic companies have increased the number of animals in labs to test the effectiveness of their products. It is undeniable that animal testing has contributed to our advances in the fields of science; however, this method is not always requisite. Many times, animal data is unreliable because the anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and people which may mislead researchers into disregard potential cures and treatments. Commonly animals used in experiments are forced to a prolonged periods of physical restraints, inhalation, and food and water deprivation. Large numbers of

Hundreds of lives and millions of dollars have been wasted on research regarding human prisoners. The information gathered usually can’t be used because it is not reliable, and the tests done did not follow rules that were already in place. When scientists begin to take advantage of prisoners or abuse their rights, their tests become irrelevant. Since prisoners have little to no rights, scientists use them to their own advantage. Many doctors, before the Nuremberg Code and the Hippocratic oath were enforced, made advancements in medicine by these malicious acts. These people were hurt and tortured due to the things that happened before laws were put in place and enforced. Many other problems arose from testing on prisoners and some even continue to affect how studies regarding prisoners are done today.

Animal experimentation is much needed in the field of medical research. This testing helps to find drugs and treatments like vaccines and antibiotics and may even save human lives. A number of animals used in animal testing are animals considered to be pests or unwanted. The animal testing gets “unwanted” animals off of the streets. Another positive thing that animal testing does is to make sure that substances such as medicine and cosmetics are safe for human consumption and use. Animal testing is good because it is a procedure to test on living systems that are similar to humans. For example, chimpanzees/monkeys

Alternatives in animal testing has been a huge controversial debate around the world for years. Many researchers and scientists try to stray away from the term “alternatives” because to them, it suggests that no animals whatsoever can be completely replaced. 1 The CAAT, the Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, is based on the principles of the ‘3Rs’: replacement, reduction, and refinement. Replacement basically means the way it sounds, the animals are replaced by other methods not involving animals such as in vitro techniques, which contain human cells and tissue models that can imitate real life organs of the human body. Reduction and refinement, the other two Rs, means to cut down the number of animals used in a particular study

Animal testing has been a around since 384 BC. “Some testing methods require the animal to; die, be exposed to radiation, remove or expose organs, or subject animals to trauma to create depression and/or anxiety.” (“THE LEADING SOURCE FOR PROS & CONS OF CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES”) Animal tests and human results only coordinate about 5- 25% of the time. Not only is it inhumane, but it isn't even all that reliable. Not to mention, it`s an insufficient waste of government money. Yes it has helped us in vaccine breakthroughs, but there are more easy, less expensive, and more reliable resources.

“An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the united states for scientific and commercial testing” (ProCon.org). We are rapidly using up the earth’s supply of small animals. “A 2011 poll of nearly 1,000 biomedical scientists conducted by the science journal Nature found that more than 90% agreed that the use of animals in research is essential (ProCon.org). Right now, millions of mice, rats, rabbits, cats, dogs, and other animals are locked up in cages and are getting killed for scientific tests to create products and medicines. Thus, animal testing is cruel and inhumane to be experimenting on animals, there are alternative methods available to researchers to replace animal testing, and that animals are so different from human beings that research on animals often yields irrelevant results.

All through the world animals have, and are still being used in science for research, education, medical, and cosmetic purposes. Millions of animals, including rats, dogs, cats, and birds have been used in procedures in just this decade alone. Testing on animals can be painful, and deadly. Even though animal research is easier than human research, animal experimentation should be put to an end, because animals should not have to suffer while testing products for human purposes.

As a scientist opens the rusty cage door, the fuzzy hamster bolts to the very edge so that the scientist would have trouble getting the mouse out. The hamster squeals, cries, and shivers, as the huge hand wraps around its body pulling the hamster out of the cage. As soon as the hand releases the hamster, the scientist injects numerous amounts of chemicals into it. The chemicals are so toxic that the mouse lost its life instantly. Even though many researchers chose to use animal testing, that is one of the many ways of research. Animal testing should no longer be needed since there are better, alternative ways to research without harming live animals.

For my senior paper I intend on writing about the effects animal testing has on the animals themselves and the reasons behind it being illegal. Animal testing is the use of living animals for experiments and/or to perform tests testing the safety of a human product. My thesis will be along the lines of “Inhumanly treating animals with unnecessary tests for the use of human products that often lack validity, due to the different ways animals and humans react to certain chemicals and supplements, should be outlawed.” I will talk about the types of testing, the products scientist use and whether or not it is an accurate way of determining if the items used are safe for human use.

Argumentative Essay (Disagree) With the demand of cosmetics and skin care being higher than ever, it is exceptionally important that the condition of these products is safe for human handling. For years, the seemingly best way to achieve this level of safety has been to test on animals. Discussions on this topic include many fallacies and misunderstandings that persuade the general public to support animal testing. However, it is no misconception that a cosmetic item is not worth the degree of agony and suffering these species experience in these tests.

Animals are used by scientists to develop research for new medications and experiments daily. The Humane Society is working to decrease the use of animals in laboratories by promoting the advancement of affective alternative approaches. Animal testing provides a useful model for treatments of diseases and possible cures. According to the US-based foundation of Biomedical Research, animal testing has made a major advance within the last century- for veterinary health and humans. The practice of using animals for testing has been debated for many decades. Is it morally right or wrong to use animals during experiments? Does federal law ensure that animals used in research are treated humanely? When considering the benefits of animal testing,

Animal testing, although a controversial topic, affects a great deal of scientists and the work force in the agriculture field. This topic has proven difficult to communicate to one another about because there are individuals that believe animals should have certain rights and others believe that animals have no rights. Our group wanted to research this topic because we want to gain knowledge and become more understanding toward the people on both sides of the spectrum. Digging more into the research we found that cosmetics, medical use, and food are the most widely used methods for experimentation. With these research fields, people are finding ways to appeal to the ethics of the modern-day consumer.