Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing

Most individuals would be saddened knowing that animals were being harshly experimented on for human benefits. The testing of animals is deemed to be cruel and inhumane. However animal testing has saved thousands of humans lives. Some believe the sacrifice is worth the gains, but others disagree and suggest other testing methods. Ultimately, the question that arises on many different occasions, is if animals should be experimented on, or not.

Over one million animals are burned, immobilized, poisoned, and tortured in US labs every year (DoSomething.org). Animal testing is considered a very controversial topic that evolves to protesting rather large companies, and also leads to boycotting a specific brand that is known to test on animals. Animals should not be used for testing products because it is cruel to the animals, there are now new ways to test products, and animals are very different from humans so they are not accurate results.

92% of all drugs have failed because they don't work or they're either too dangerous (animal testing). Animal Experimentation is the use of animals to test human products such as drugs/medication, cosmetics items, shower/bath soaps and lotion, etc. We need to enforce the NO animal testing law because it’s inhumane, we have other technology, and anyway 9 out of 10 tests fail.

According to the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, twelve billion dollars of taxpayer money is spent of funding for animal testing annually (More than $12 billion wasted annually on animal testing in taxpayer money [Infographic]. Retrieved March 25, 2018 from www.peta.org). $300,000 was given to Northeastern University to inject hamsters with steroids and force them to fight, $500,000 to University of Utah to induce heart attacks in dogs, and $1.6 million to the Oregon Health and Science University to turn mice and monkeys into alcohols. All three of these experiments were funded by taxpayer money, even though “the controversial nature of government-back animal testing has actually created an unlikely coalition of fiscal conservatives and animal rights activists who usually don’t share common ground. Both sides argue that NIH funding for animal testing should be cut.” (Bastasch, 2013). The national government continues to not only allow companies and universities to perform sadistic tests on animals, but also gives the funding to the companies and

Hundreds of lives and millions of dollars have been wasted on research regarding human prisoners. The information gathered usually can’t be used because it is not reliable, and the tests done did not follow rules that were already in place. When scientists begin to take advantage of prisoners or abuse their rights, their tests become irrelevant. Since prisoners have little to no rights, scientists use them to their own advantage. Many doctors, before the Nuremberg Code and the Hippocratic oath were enforced, made advancements in medicine by these malicious acts. These people were hurt and tortured due to the things that happened before laws were put in place and enforced. Many other problems arose from testing on prisoners and some even continue to affect how studies regarding prisoners are done today.

In 2014 the University of Sydney killed eight marmosets to study the retinas from eight eyes and explore a type of cell that exists in the eye. The study states that “only one eye was used from each of the marmosets” and whilst the study allowed them to better characterize the cell, it did not contribute to any medical advancements for humans (Humane Research Australia, 2016). This inhumane treatment of animals makes one wonder about the ethicality of these animal research experimentations. Animal testing is a global ethical issue because it negates the dignity of animals. Scientists and medical professionals support animal testing as a means to enhance and prolong human life, whereas PETA and RSPCA oppose animal testing because it does

Look at the tag of your shirt, where does it say its from? Now, does it say how many people it took to make it or how much time it took? Apply that same logic to when you buy shampoo. Does it say how many animals died when they tested the product? No, it does not. Companies and factories do this for a reason, they want us to be unaware of the facts. Within the next few moments I hope to enlighten you with information you may not know about animal testing.

Alternatives in animal testing has been a huge controversial debate around the world for years. Many researchers and scientists try to stray away from the term “alternatives” because to them, it suggests that no animals whatsoever can be completely replaced. 1 The CAAT, the Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing, is based on the principles of the ‘3Rs’: replacement, reduction, and refinement. Replacement basically means the way it sounds, the animals are replaced by other methods not involving animals such as in vitro techniques, which contain human cells and tissue models that can imitate real life organs of the human body. Reduction and refinement, the other two Rs, means to cut down the number of animals used in a particular study

testing. Another article by PETA voiced, “We have moved away from studying human disease in humans. … We all drank the Kool-Aid on that one, me included. … The problem is that [animal testing] hasn’t worked, and it’s time we stopped dancing around the problem. … We need to refocus and adapt new methodologies for use in humans to understand disease biology in humans” (Peta). This has been the problem for years now, that problem is how inaccurate the results are. Also, how the medical groups keep on getting these false results and still will not change their ways.

I strongly agree with the con side of the Article(animals shouldn't be used for testing) for the simple reason that they are alive as well as feeling pain. People are too. It needs to stop,as long as it doesn’t, it only turns People into bigger monsters. It’s also a big waste of money on inaccurate experiments that waste animals’ lives.

Animal experiments happen all over the world, but are they necessary? Animals are tested for medical research as well as for cosmetics. Some say that these experiments are not painful, so they are justified. Where others believe that all these experiments are inhumane and nothing can justify torturing and killing innocent animals. Although many believe that animal testing is the best way to improve human health by finding new treatments and tests for the safety of the products, the physical torture and painful deaths of animals are not worth the possible human benefits.

Animals are used by scientists to develop research for new medications and experiments daily. The Humane Society is working to decrease the use of animals in laboratories by promoting the advancement of affective alternative approaches. Animal testing provides a useful model for treatments of diseases and possible cures. According to the US-based foundation of Biomedical Research, animal testing has made a major advance within the last century- for veterinary health and humans. The practice of using animals for testing has been debated for many decades. Is it morally right or wrong to use animals during experiments? Does federal law ensure that animals used in research are treated humanely? When considering the benefits of animal testing,

At many other labs the owners of them require its scientist to have to kind of animal care certification (Wade). At many labs they have a class that the scientist can take so that they are qualified to work at their lab (Wade). Most labs will also have animal care professionals on their site to take care of the animals. But sometimes, the caretakers aren’t caring for the animals, and they end up suffering from even more pain (Wade).

In my opinion animal testing should be continued. Some people prefer to test things on prisoners than on animals, but a human's life is more valuable than an animal's. Animals reproduce fast and humans don't. Rabbits,rats and mice are some of the animals that reproduce really fast. I personally eat meat so i'm basically killing animals for my own good, I wouldn't mind killing animals for my own safety. I would prefer that an animal gets hurt,of killed instead of a human being.

Animal testing, although a controversial topic, affects a great deal of scientists and the work force in the agriculture field. This topic has proven difficult to communicate to one another about because there are individuals that believe animals should have certain rights and others believe that animals have no rights. Our group wanted to research this topic because we want to gain knowledge and become more understanding toward the people on both sides of the spectrum. Digging more into the research we found that cosmetics, medical use, and food are the most widely used methods for experimentation. With these research fields, people are finding ways to appeal to the ethics of the modern-day consumer.