Why We Should Be Allowed Animals In Captivity Essay

One of the reasons why we should keep animals in captivity is because animals are simply safer in zoos than in the wild as said in the article, Animals Locked Up. Another one of the reasons why we should keep animals in captivity is because the zoo and safari park are great places for people to explore the animal kingdom that is close to their homes. For example, if I wanted to go to see

Zoos, rehabilitation institutions, and many other environmental centers provide opportunities for the public to witness animals that cannot be seen on a daily basis. Whether to keep animals in captivity is morally hard to decide, especially for me personally. In the essay, “Against Zoos,” by Dale Jamieson, he writes about the positives zoos provide, and then reiterates them; making positives turn into negatives. Jamieson makes statements about humans being superior over animals, and how we should not be thinking that we are better. We tend to take a lead role over other species, because of our “higher intelligence.” That should not mean that we treat wildlife as if they are something lower than us. In more ways than one, we as humans are

Captivity against law unsigned documents. Abuse, infliction, and affliction. What are you gonna do about it? For thousands of years, we have used predators to hunt for us and their reward being stuck in cages and prostitution. They come back in free will or in fear. Ever since the beginning of time, we have been trying to control these wild beasts. What happens when they're not there to finish the life cycle? EXTINCTION. We have lost 99% of our animal species, most of this loss is from billions of people keeping animals in captivity.

To answer this complex question, philosophy professor Bryan Norton poses some additional concerns relevant to this issue. He notes that if in fact keeping these animals in captivity is ethical, then we must also discuss what specifically humans want to conserve (Norton 15). Is it limited just to animal species, or can it extend to populations, ecosystems, and natural processes? If we simply identify wild animals, then we must ask ourselves if we are preserving a wild species if the animals themselves are forced to spend their lives in captivity? He mentions a common analogy used among zoo professionals who refer themselves to a modern day Noah’s ark, preserving each species by removing individuals for conservation. If zoos represent a sanctuary from extinction, then we must also address if there will ever be a natural habitat to reintroduce the animals into, or if they be forced to remain on the zoos “Ark” indefinitely (Norton 16). Though the work of various ethical scholars and philosophers may not be able to provide a concrete answer to all of the respective questions, I will discuss the concept of reintroduction when analyzing the third argument of this essay.

those animals should not be kept in captivity. For example, Orcas do not belong in captivity.

Although keeping animals in captivity is bad because they don't get to be themselves they should keep animals in zoos or captivity because it helps the species not go extinct, it brings happiness to families that go to the zoo, and zoos bring in enough money to build better exhibits. Even though zoos still have negative impacts on animals lives they should still keep animals in

In “Morality’s progress essays on humans, other animals, and rest of nature, “ Dale Jamieson argues that the zoos establishment and he against the zoos . The strongest argument Jamieson gives for this argument is that taking animal from their native environment to zoos they will lose their freedom. In this paper Provide an assessment of Jamieson’s argument. Animal And liberty Jamieson argue that put the animal in captivity And restrict their freedom .

Exotic animals need their freedom. They should be banned as pets. Not only do they need to be in their natural habitat, but they are extremely dangerous, and one day that cute, little, baby tiger is eventually going to find its true self and turn on you!

There are different opinions on the subject matter. Some people support the rights of animals to the extent, that they find it extremely cruel to keep them in captivity, comparing it to imprisonment, whilst others say captivity of animals is essential to their further existence and well-being. Many neutral analyst on this debate topic have pointed to the fact that acting in accordance to moral and emotional notions is not the most ideal approach on such a complicated and ambiguous problem such as this. Rather the important question that should be emphasized upon, is what manner of living would be most beneficial for animals?

In the end, I believe that animals in captivity is good, because it helps fund organizations, saves animals from extinction, and helps educate people. We all should educate ourselves on exotic animals and their needs, we should also force permits to keep/capture exotic

“Animals in captivity are affected by extreme boredom, lack of appropriate exercise, poor quality food and a lack of variety of food, especially in poorly run facilities” (Education Reform, Choo). Imagine you got ripped out of your home and put in a small cage with no interaction with other animals and terrible food. You have no idea what's going on and what's going to happen to you, that's was animal's face everyday in captivity. Animals in captivity are abandoned and not fed the right foods, they do not get treated right and get pulled out of there families just to be put in a small cage. Studies show that animals in captivity have a shorter life span and they are more likely to get depressed when they are taken away from their families.

As circuses keep growing with a variety of animals, more and more animals are being abused. Every animal is different just like every human is, some think animals should be kept in captivity and in circuses because they get things that they won’t get in the wild, other think the opposite. Those are the main reasons I think animals should not be in captivity, I hope it has changed what you thought about the animals in circuses and anywhere else in the

Many people think we should ban animals in captivity, and others may think we should not ban the animals. Honestly we should not ban animals. There's plenty of reasons why we should not ban animals from zoos and other exhibits. In "Myth And Reality" it says as long as the animals are kept in captivity they are suppose to get treated humanly, because studies have shown that animals suffer mentally, emotionally, and even physically. It also says that zoos claim to teach visitors about the wild life conservation and habitat protection. Its not so much that the animals aren't in their natural habitat because the zoos make their large cages look and seem like if they are in their natural habitat. On the other hand people think we should ban the

“In 2010, a undercover investigator filmed sick animals left untreated and dead animals to rot on floors at Tweddle Farm Zoo”(Captive Animals 5). Leaving animals to rot and die is deadly to the animals around it and can cause deadly disease. Zoos cannot provide the care that animals need, and cannot give anywhere close to amount of space the animals have in the wild, therefore I believe that animals should not be held in captivity.

Firstly, from the viewpoint of Animal Rights, it is inhumane and unethical to capture and imprison them in cages. They have right to move freely in their environment wherever they want, just like humans. Moreover, we do not have a right to use the animals as a tool for public entertainment and making profits out of their acts or tricks. Animals, which are forced to perform stunts or unnatural tricks for human entertainment every day, eventually, become weak and hence it impacts their natural growth. As a result, many animals have died in the captivity. For instance, Almost 500 animals have died in a Cumbrian zoo in the UK since 2013. (Perraudin)