Argumentative Essay On Capital Punishment

Capital punishment is one of the most controversial topics in today’s world. Many people believe that it is morally wrong to have capital punishment as a sentence to a crime. People also do believe that it is morally permissible for a severe crime. Capital punishment is also known as the death penalty. It can be given as a sentence when somebody is convicted of an extremely violent crime. The biggest issue that can be seen with this is that somebody could be innocent and sentenced with the death penalty because of the nature of the crime that they have been accused of even if they didn’t commit it. I believe that there is a moral line between using the death penalty and using other forms of punishment.

The date is March 24, 2016, within the United States, there has already been a total of nine people executed. Of these nine, five were executed in the state of Texas. Those that have been executed were tried and convicted for the most heinous of crimes. For the death sentence is only issued to those found guilty of 1st degree murder. In normal circumstances murder in the first degree is not the only offense committed by the defendant. A portion of the individuals were already committing one felony when they killed a person which was there reason for receiving a capital punishment sentence.

People on death row are not really dying. “In 2010, a death row inmate waited an average of 178 months (roughly 15 years) between sentencing and execution. Nearly a quarter of deaths on death row in the U.S. are due to natural causes.” (Wikipedia, 2015). We are paying tax dollars to have people sit in prison for up to 15 years, and to have three quarters of them executed. Should we even have capital punishment?

Andrew was only twenty three years old when he robbed the liquor store on South Lincoln Avenue. He was a high school dropout and didn’t know where his life was headed at that time. If he could go back, he would not have let his friends talk him into doing it. Yes, they needed the money for rent but looking back at the event, it just was not worth it. He’s always had good intentions, but never a drive to discover his potential, which resulted in this. He is now serving his eighth month in prison so far and has put a lot of thought into the lifelong impact this will have on him. “How long will it take him to find a job?, Where will he stay?,Will his mom and sister, take him back after what he did?” He never explained why he did what he did

In the United States of America, murder has become an epidemic. People are getting murdered now more then ever and to the families of these victim’s capital punishment seems to be the only closure they can find. Capital punishment is the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime. I stand with capital punishment because I stand with those families. Also, there is a possibility the prisoner could escape and continue their violent murderous habits, and capital punishment keeps prison populations at a sustainable level.

Cantu was age 17 when he was accused of committing capital murder in 1993. The teen was found guilty and executed. 12 years after his death, Texas investigators found that there was no way possible that Cantu could have committed the murder. The worst part is the police had little evidence to go by and there were only a few eye witnesses that convicted and executed this innocent minor. Debates over capital punishment have been around since its first use in the U.S. in 1608. With the increase of controversies regarding the topic, the need for the right information and facts is prominent. Due to the death penalty’s many detrimental effects on society such as innocent lives taken, ineffectiveness, and the resources being sucked up, we should consider banning it in all 50 states.

“But secondly you say 'society must exact vengeance, and society must punish'. Wrong on both counts. Vengeance comes from the individual and punishment from God.”

Immanuel Kant a philosopher has said, “a society that is not willing to demand a life of somebody who has taken somebody else’s life is simply immoral” (ProCon.org). Kant a german philosopher brought this idea into society during the 1700s. Since then scholars and philosophers have debated if a death penalty should be allotted. In the United states the government has the power to take away life to those that they see fit. Certain states have stopped using the death penalty and this Over multiple years critiques“Currently out of fifty states, seventeen have abolished the death penalty (Death Penalty Information Center). The death penalty should be legalized in all states. The perspectives I’m going to use to look at the death penalty is deterrence and morality. If you see the death penalty through the lens of irrevocable mistakes you can see that the opposing argument do not hold up.

Capital punishment has been a basic piece of human culture and its lawful framework for a considerable length of time. It is often viewed as a vital sanction to the most heinous of crimes as well as an approach to stop future lawbreakers by fear of death. In many cases, this sort of punishment came to be viewed as an immoral act against humanity, and its legitimacy in a plethora of legal systems has been addressed. As of recently, the civil argument persists. This brought about a wide disparity of laws on this issue. A few countries including China, the US, Iran, Belarus, and others protect capital punishment as a choice, while others like Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every European country have canceled the death penalty. Despite the obvious negatives, others chose to keep the practice in their laws. The death penalty is an overzealous “eye for an eye” tactic, that is and has been damaging the fabric of our society. The expense, the immorality and the control over another life to such degree, should be cause enough for any country to not just rethink this heinous and inhumane punishment but to abolish it. The United States inheritance of slavery and racial corruption proceeded with offense, in our utilization of capital punishment, where nearly three times the general population on death row is of black decent.

The justice system being so corrupt making seem like most punishments does not seem to adequate fit the crime and making it seem like a slap on the hand. When in reality, this is not solving the problem but instead worsening it. Unnecessary evil of modern society should be deterring a murderer from murdering again because it is a vicious cycle that must be put to a halted. Killers should be disciplined for the crimes they have committed and must pay for the price of their crime. The death penalty is necessary because the punishment should fit the crime like a life for a life, it is less cruel to euthanize than to keep a murderer in prison for the rest of their lives and it is costly to keep them in prison.

The death penalty, death as a consequence given by law due to the committing of a serious crime. The death penalty is given to those who commit serious crimes such as treason, terrorism, drug trafficking, and murder. The death penalty is a horrific consequence that has an abundance of improving to do for the sake of everyone. If the death penalty system isn’t changed soon more innocent people will continue to die due to the mistake of the court.

I have recently viewed your thought-provoking article about the use of capital punishment and believe that both your arguments and the principles you support are tenuous. Finding someone with views vastly different from my own is rather startling, so by analysing the indifferent conclusions you have discussed in your writing I am hopeful I will present a strong counter-argument to the questionable ideas you strongly believe in.

Every society has a set of laws that are used to maintain order within the society. Crime laws are enforced to reduce crimes. If the laws were broken, people would receive consequences that are equal to the magnitude of the crime. Although all sanctions should equal the crime, there is a controversial method: the death penalty. Death punishment is a cruel fate even for a criminal who had cause great harms. The death penalty has more negative impacts than benefits. It is an ineffective method to punish someone for a crime because of its high percentage of error and the high costs of performing such sanction. It is also an outdated practice that many countries have

The death penalty is still a controversial issue within some states in the United States. Capital Punishment, is also known as the death penalty is a government practice where a person is put to death by the state for a punishment of a crime. However, the crucial act of putting someone to death has been the center of discussion for some states. The state of Arkansas has recently rushed the death penalty for eight inmates. There are several elements that concludes that the death penalty should be abolished completely from the United States.

Is capital punishment a cruel and unusual fate or is it a necessary form of justice? Capital punishment is also referred to as the death penalty, which is a form of action taken by the court of law where a guilty conviction means you pay with your life. Being an American citizen, I believe that we live in the freest country on earth and have a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. However, in our pledge of allegiance it states that we also have justice for all. So, is the death penalty the ultimate justice or does it seek vengeance through bloodshed? Honestly, there are many valid points on both sides of the argument which makes it is such a controversial topic. Our country is one of 57 worldwide that still use the death