Argumentative Essay On Electoral College

Though our founding fathers created the Electoral College over 200 years ago, it has been changed with time to accommodate modern needs and is still an important and necessary part of our electoral system. The Electoral College ensures political stability in our nation by encouraging the two-party system and also protects the interests of minorities. Furthermore, the Electoral College helps maintain a united country by requiring widespread popular support of a candidate in order for him or her to become president.

Despite the Electoral College system being founded by the founding fathers in America and being there as long as the Constitution exists, many people still do not have sufficient knowledge on how it works. The Electoral College does not provide honest presidential elections rather it has the potential to undo the will of people at any point from the selection of electors to the vote tallying in Congress (Shaw, 3). Electoral College in the United States has played a major role in depressing the voter's turnout. Every State is given an equal number of electoral votes despite the population and in turn, the system has put in place no measure to encourage the voters to take part in the elections. Besides, the system distorts

One of the reason why the Electoral College should not be destroyed, is that it helps the candidates who may struggle with the popular vote. In 1980, for Presidential Election, candidate Ronald Reagan barely won the popular vote (50.7%). With the help of the Electoral Vote, Reagan took 91% of it, which then made him the winner (Doc B). Also in 1992, Candidate Bill Clinton, did not even have half the country on his side (43%). With the help of the Electoral Vote, Clinton

The Electoral College is the system the United States have used to elect the President for the past two hundred years. In this essay, the reader will see that although it did the best way to represent the will of the American people, and in this essay a better alternative will be proposed to the reader. The Electoral college was created in September sixth, nineteen-eighty-seven, and was described as (founder definition) and was meant to allow a stronger South, who by using the three-fifths compromise of 1787 to allow themselves more votes and ensure they are given the most federal power (Amar). This paper will show the reader that the Electoral College is flawed in the way that minority candidates can be elected, less populated states are overrepresented, and swing states are given the most attention.

The Electoral College has been around since the Constitution was first written and has been controversial ever since it was started. The process of electing a president includes the Electoral College, which has a rich and interesting history; there are many arguments for and against the College, but the way the Electoral College works now is not representative of the country’s opinion as a whole.

A number of Americans fail to realize that when they vote they are not voting for the president and vice-president directly, but for electors who then cast their ballots in the Electoral College. Until the recent battle between Gov. George W. Bush and Vice-president Al Gore for the presidency, this new generation of American voters has never witnessed a controversial election. Historically, there have been problematic elections allowing voters to question this system. The Electoral College is now a process open to criticism and debate, specifically because many do not understand its origin or purpose today. On November 7, 2000, Election Day, I was excited to become an official voter.

First, The Electoral College prevents majority rule and should not be abolished. ”The Electoral College gives states with small populations a measure of protection against domination by states with large populations. It levels the political playing field a bit” (Williams, Walter E.). It is said that Hillary Clinton won popular vote majority. Therefore, if the nation were not encumbered with outdated electoral college. Clinton, instead of our present one, would be the next president of the United States. In 2000, Al Gore won the popular vote just as Clinton supposedly did. Such outcomes have led to calls to desert the Constitution's Article two provisions for the state electors to select presidents. Before the U.S. deserts the Electoral College, let's consider the purpose it performs. According to 2013 Census Data, Nine states- California, Texas, New York, Florida, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Georgia, and Michigan have populations

Many common fallacies exist in alternative arguments to the electoral college such as the idea that the popular vote would give more influence to the voters. This is false in the case of California. If you divide California 55 electoral votes by 270 which is the number of votes you need to win you get 20.4 percent.California's electoral votes influence is represented by this percentage. Hypothetically if we used a popular vote system we could use her 8.7 million votes she received and divided it by the number of votes it would of took to beat Trump in a popular vote which would be about 63 million. This percentage out to 13.8 percent and would represent how much influence california would have in a popular vote race. As you can see numbers

Write an essay that explains how the Electoral College works. How does the Electoral College shape the strategy of candidates? Why is it harder to win presidential elections post 1968?

Do you believe the electoral college is the ideal method to vote for the next president of the united states? I do not agree with this method of choosing the president and I think the popular vote should be the method of voting instead. In the Electoral College you vote for someone to vote the president for you which defeats the purpose of voting. Especially since that person legally doesn't have to vote for who you want. Also the electoral college makes voting more complicated which differs from the popular vote method which is easier by just counting votes and the winner would be who has the most votes. My last reason for abolishing the Electoral College and using the popular vote method is it would help other parties instead of just the Republican and Democratic parties. As third party candidates never won due to the electoral college being more helpful to the other parties.The electoral college is a complicated and not fair way of voting for the president. The process defeats the purpose of voting and most of the time helps only two parties which give the other parties a very low chance of winning.

The Founding Fathers wanted to distinguish the newly formed United States from a pure democracy. The Framers defined democracy as government decisions made directly by the people. They decided to use a republic form of government because it promised wiser government. This type of government would allow decisions to be made by representatives elected by people.

Each state is allocated a minimum of 3 electoral votes; more are given based on state population. Residents of each state vote for whomever they want, and the candidate who wins the popular vote in that state is ostensibly awarded all of its electoral votes. Two states: Maine and Nebraska are the only ones in which electoral votes are awarded via district, rather than the entire state. There is however an added measure in the electoral process to thwart the will of the masses. In December after the November election, electors from each state meet to vote for the president. While the electors typically vote according to the body of people they are representing, this is not strictly mandated. Essentially 538 electors are the ones who

Our election process somewhat represents the diversity of our nation.The winner takes all system in the electoral college, campaign finance and voter ID laws all represent limitations to our voices.

After votes are counted and the anticipation of who the country’s next leader is over, people around the nation discover that the over all favored candidate lost the election from having fewer electoral votes from the competitor. The underrepresentation of the majority’s choice in the United State’s election fuels the beliefs of supporters to abolish the Electoral College. People who oppose abolishing the Electoral College do so with the belief that it prevents the oppression of majority rule. The position of whether or not the Electoral College should be eliminated divides the United States from numerous sides. Why does the Electoral College continue to be used if it can fail to reflect the will of the people?

The United States is globally recognized as a democratic nation, granting voting rights to its citizens that place the power of government in their hands. This power is held dear by U.S. citizens nationwide, as well as other nations who strive for democracy and recognition. Unfortunately, this universally recognized right is quite erroneous. The United States uses a system called the Electoral College to elect the President and Vice President. This system consists of 538 electors that choose the President for the people – nullifying the concept of democracy. Therefore, the United States should abandon the Electoral College system for Presidential elections because it places the power of government in the hands or politicians and political machines, while revoking power from the hands of the citizens – from the hands of the people.