Argumentative Essay On Gun Control

What is gun control? Who is affected by gun control? Why should someone care about gun control? Imagine going to a concert with your friends and family, you guys are laughing and having a good time when all of a sudden someone starts shooting up the place. Are you thinking to yourself if guns were banned this wouldn't have happened? Or are you wishing you had a gun to protect everyone from what is happening? Gun Control has been an issue since the beginning of time, there are some people who think we need it and others who say we have the right to bear arms. With gun control a lot more lives could be saved and people won't have to be scared of a mass shooting happening somewhere. Children can feel safe when going to school and they won’t

The Second Amendment of the US Constitution reads, "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Owning a gun has been an old American tradition. So old it is older than the country itself and is being protected by the Second Amendment; more gun control laws would break apart of our rights, which is the right to bear arms. The Second Amendment defends a persons right to own a gun without having to be a police officer, and to use that right for lawful purposes, such as self-defense within that person’s home. The right to possess and bear laws so fundamental it is as fundamental and as critical to maintaining liberty as are the rights of free speech,

Gun control is a very controversial topic on the modern American’s mind lately. Over the last few years, this topic has become increasingly more heated because of the recent horrendous events that have occurred in the United States. Gun Laws is a touchy subject no matter where you go inside of the states. The recent mass shootings at the Pulse nightclub and the Route 91 Harvest Music festival have forced gun Laws to be put under the microscope. People on both sides of the argument are joining in to make the United States a safer place. I don’t know whether harsher gun laws will limit the quantity and size of mass shootings or whether it will deter future shooters from committing a crime. Would looking at other countries Gun laws such as Australia help us reform our own laws more fluidly?

He declared that the most prominent issue in this debate regarded the effect of gun availability on the distribution, seriousness, and number of violent crimes (Cook, 1981). Cook discusses that gun control measures come in various forms, but the most prevalent is to reduce the availability of guns for criminal use, where as gun control opponents insist that this approach is ineffective as guns are not the issue, it is the individuals themselves who intend to kill. Cook examined the dimensions of the violent crime problem through conducting further research and examining it against incidents of murder, assault, and robbery. The research concluded that the seriousness and distribution of violent crimes is influenced by the weapon choice and type, which indicates for example, criminals with a gun a more likely to approach a less vulnerable victim than if they were carrying just a knife (Cook, 1981). Also, by reducing gun availability it would result in criminals substituting their choice of weapons and overall provide a little change in robbery and assault rates, wheres as homicide rates would reduce (Cook, 1981). Cook (1981) states that it is reasonable to propose that gun control measures of a moderate form have the ability to discourage some criminals from obtaining guns however this does not account for all aspects of the violent crime problem; therefore, gun control efforts should be just one aspect of the effort to find a solution to the violent crime

With all these mass shootings happening recently in our country it has brought up a huge discussion on if guns should be legal or not. My view on guns is if you have a clean history and no mental illness issues I have nothing wrong with someone owning a gun. Therefore I am for guns for self defense and hunting. I think having a gun is a huge responsibility and you shouldn’t be able to have any history of being a criminal or have a history of having a mental illness even to the slightest degree. These mass shooters I 100% think that they had a mental illness and sent them over the edge because I don’t know how anyone in the right mind could do a crime as big as killing hundreds of innocent people for no reason.

During the early history of the United States, gun regulations were a state centered issued. In 1827, Georgia was one of the first state to try to implement gun regulations by passing a bill that attempted to ban handguns. The law is ruled unconstitutional and thrown out (Utter, 2000). As gun technology progressed during World War One and the Thompson submachine gun was developed a change for stricter gun regulations was inevitable. The History News Network reported that, “at least 27 states enacted measures to restrict or outlaw the sale and possession of fully automatic weapons prior to 1934 (Spiltzer, 2015)”. The country understood the need to regulate fully automatic weapons but the issue would be further expounded due to the fact that

Guns have always been a large part of the American culture, and are becoming a more controversial topic due to recent incidents. Over the past century gun problem has been a considerable debate in the United States. Guns are too easily accessible, they should either be restricted or strictly regulated. Guns also allow people to commit suicide. Another problem why gun contol should be imposed is to protect women from domestic abuse. Yes, the II Amendment says ''A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to bear arms, shall not be infringed''. The intention of this amendment was to protect the right of militias to bear arms, not the right of individuals. Guns supporters love to cite and twist the 2 Amendment for their own convenience and justify the right to carry a weapon. Along the way, conservatives has shifted the meaning of the 2 Amendment to justify any inidividuals own a weapon easily.

Gun control, one of the most sensitive issues in America today; should we the people believe in gun control or should we discard it as futile. The American constitution states in the second amendment “ A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed“, and so why should there be a need to put regulations on gun ownership. On the other hand gun control helps regulate on persons who can own a gun such as the mentally ill and convicted felons who can cause more harm to others and themselves. Gun control will also help decrease school shootings and other mayhem that occurs in the United states. If gun control helps regulate on gun violence why is it so controversial?

Gun control does not stop criminals from obtaining guns; guns deter crime, but there should be some gun control such as universal background checks all federally licensed firearms dealer (FFL) can use. That is why there should be some gun control but not much. Guns are weapons and like any weapons, there are certain restrictions you must follow but, for the most part, any weapon/tool is allowed. What is so bad about that? Firstly,there is one major flaw with gun control and that is criminals can still buy a gun illegally and use it. So by creating gun laws it will not help, only hinder, the American citizen about the way to buy guns. To criminals, breaking the law is not a big deal; that is why criminals have the name. “To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to

As deciding to what topic I would choose to write a research paper on, the choice was quite simple. The major topic of many discussions today are about guns, gun control and how deadly they can be. The question at hand in my book is simple, are guns bad or are people bad? I believe that legal citizens, who can pass a background check with no prior felonies, should be entitled to the right to purchase and obtain a firearm. With that being said, there are quite a few loopholes in the current system. I tend to use the reference of drugs as an example. Drugs are illegal for anyone to purchase, but when an addict wants a fix they always have an ample supply from a local drug dealer. If guns do eventually get banned in the United

There should be a strict gun control law in the United States to regulate gun holders and eliminate the misuse of gun and gun violence. It is necessary for the American people to be more careful with all the firearms due to the result of many gun death whether it’s an accident or on purpose.

The gun control debate has been one of the centerpieces of American political discourse for the last several decades. On one side are those who firmly believe that the widespread availability of guns makes America more dangerous, and that stricter scrutiny should be applied both to who can own guns and what guns people can own. On the other side are those who believe that not only would increased firearms regulation be a violation of constitutional rights, but that it would have little to no effect on violence in America. Beneath this fiery, sometimes irrational debate are two core concepts of US political theory: constitutional interpretation and federalism.

The issue of gun control has always been debatable in the United States. In the United States for every 100 people there is 88.8 guns. This is the highest number of guns in the world. There have been many mass shootings even at an elementary school. One of the deadliest massacre happened at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newton, Connecticut. Twenty-six children and six adults are killed on December 14, 2012. Due to all the gun violence President Obama felt a need to update and expand background checks for gun control. He issued the new executive actions on January 5, 2016. Many individuals feel gun control is a necessity, whereas others feel it is problematic. One may argue the gun debate revolves around the interpretation of the Second Amendment.

Gun control is a continued discussion amongst both politicians and the American citizens. The idea of gun control has affected how people will vote for politicians. Sixty-one percent of United States registered voters say that gun control is one of many factors that influence their vote for a candidate. Besides the sixty-one percent of United States registered voters that say that gun control influences their vote for a candidate, twenty-four percent of registered voters will only vote for a candidate that shares their views on gun control.

Would society be better off with or without gun control? Plenty of people believe that owning a firearm can become dangerous or a way of security. Michael Warfel wrote an article, “Why Gun Control?”, explaining the reasons for more firearm limitation. Warfel does not believe in the complete ban of all guns, but he feels that gangs and criminals obtain powerful guns too easily. If legislators who create laws, made more regulations on guns, then people use guns less senselessly. Warfel wrote a argument that goes into what society can do to ensure that the use of guns have well intentions. The author’s structure, resources, and lack of acknowledging the opposing side makes his argument poor.