Argumentative Essay On Gun Control

The Second Amendment of the US Constitution protects individual gun ownership. The Second Amendment of the US Constitution reads, "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Gun ownership is an American tradition older than the country itself and is protected by the Second Amendment; more gun control laws would infringe upon the right to bear arms. Justice Antonin Scalia, LLB, in the June 26, 2008 District of Columbia et al. v. Heller US Supreme Court majority opinion syllabus stated, "The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home." The McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) ruling also stated that the Second Amendment is an individual right. Lawrence Hunter, Chairman of Revolution PAC, stated, "The Founders understood that the right to own and bear laws is as fundamental and as essential to maintaining liberty as are the rights of free speech, a free press, freedom of religion and the other protections against government encroachments on liberty delineated in the Bill of Rights."

In an editorial published in the Vidette Online titled “We Need Gun Control Now More Than Ever,” the editorial board takes on the topic of the need for stricter gun control. The editorial board reports that if gun control isn’t more strictly enforced it will only create more mass shootings. They make the point that if there was stricter gun control many people would still be living, but their lives have been cut short because of mass shootings. The editorial board is correct when they go on to say enough is enough and we need to figure out a way to stop these mass shootings (“Editorial: We”). However, the board is not correct when they make the statement that putting an end to mass shooting is going to be solved by banning firearms all

The debate around gun control in the United States has been growing, and for good reason. Recent tragedies involving gun violence highlight even more the need for changes in the current gun laws. There needs to be two key changes, and they can be even considered updates, that need to be enforced federally. It’s not time to start pulling guns away or limit the purchasing, but rather create better tools for the current system to do its job. The first change that needs to be implemented is federally mandated background checks that are consistent across all states. The other is having sufficient waiting periods in place before being allowed to purchase guns. Overall, federally mandated background checks and waiting periods across all states are the best ways to restrain gun violence and reduce gun homicides in the U.S. because they would prevent guns from being placed in the hands of criminals or mentally ill people, while also preventing gun-wanting people during momentary lapses of judgment to purchases firearms.

A common controversial topic that is discussed universally is the issue of shootings and gun use. Citizens views on the topic range from the wishes to completely ban guns, to the total allowance and ownership of such items. In comparison, some drugs may be illegal, although people still possess them. Would the same be for guns? Should more be done to implement the control over guns? Or should more freedom be given to gun owners? One can visualize the positives and negatives regarding gun control by learning more about the following: the suspected terrorist list,

Imagine sitting in Mr. Holiday’s English classroom or eating at a favorite restaurant, and you realize people are carrying a gun holstered that is loaded. Would that make you feel comfortable and safe? The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution states" A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (“Second Amendment”). In other words, citizens of the United States have the right to carry guns for protection. The United States of America is an advanced developed country and we do not have adequate gun safety laws in place even after countless shooting massacres that have occurred over the years. The government allows individuals to

A gun is a magnet to devastating consequences. The consequences can vary from injuries which result in expensive medical bills, to death. Without a doubt, guns do not provide safety. Reason is because having a gun increases the risk of injury or death, provokes massacres, and medical bills involving guns are plunging the government's funds. Therefore, various authors present facts and statistics about cases with gun violence revealing the high number of casualties and the amount the government is spending in treating patients with gun related injuries in order to invalidate the idea that guns are safe.

The definition of gun control is “the set of laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms by civilians.” With the horrific events that have occurred lately in our country, I believe that the laws on gun control are not strict enough. There are only a handful of people who cannot possess a gun, leaving millions of other individuals with the ability to own a firearm. Almost anyone can buy a gun, but not just “anyone” should be allowed to have one.

Gun control in the US was first mentioned in the 1980’s. As the U.S. weaponry became more advanced and efficient we began to see the need to protect ourselves from the people around us. The right and ability to defend yourself is a right and ability everyone should have, but now we have evolved to the point where we are arming and increasing the danger that people face. The increase of mass shootings has raised the call for legislation to a fevered pitch for the men, women, children killed by insane men and women. There are mentally ill people all over the world, but the U.S. is the one of the only place that arms them efficiently. There are two viewpoints on this issue which is debated greatly across all platforms. Gun control is the belief we should regulate guns and create legislation to that limits access, weapons and ammo and then there's Gun rights advocates, those against any kind of limiting or infringing on the rights of the people. Carter Gregg Lee is a professor in sociology at Bryant University. “The magnification hypothesis is supported when one considers the lethality effect that assault by guns produces. Numerous studies confirm that gunshot wounds are much more likely to result in death than wounds inflicted by a knife. In comparing U.S. violence rates to those of its peer nations, gun control advocates observe that assaults in the United States are more likely to involve guns.” ("Magnification Hypothesis." ) Mr. Carter Lee has created a hypothesis that there is a correlation between gun prevention and homicide rates. As a gun Control advocate, he points his argument toward the actual damage and destruction caused directly by guns. Dr.Evan L Lipkins is an Internist in Glennville Illinois. He states “Creating jobs, teaching values in school, early screening for mental health and helping broken families may be far more important than taking guns away from people.” This is a common argument in Gun control circles. But to state that its a singular problem is completely illogical. While it's true that earlier mental health screenings would definitely be beneficial it won’t eradicate the problem. As long as guns are readily available to anyone who wants them The problem will continue to . People

The Second Amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” People interpret the Second Amendment to mean that all people have the right to own guns, but not all people should be able to own them. “In 2007, 385,178 total firearm crimes were committed, including 11,512 murders, 190,514 robberies, and 183,153 aggravated assaults” (Giffords). The United States government must have stronger laws about purchasing guns.

In today's society, there seems to be a general concern about the presence of guns. Many different groups of people advocate for stricter gun control from school teachers to the Obama Administration. Society’s views are shaped and changed by what we see and hear. Many people are uneducated on political issues and are very susceptible to believe what they hear. I want the American people to look at facts, do their own research, and then form their own opinion. Form your opinion on what you believe is best for the country and yourself, don’t go along with something just because that’s what you’re told.

Gun control in the United States has been one of the most controversy topics this year. For some they find it unnecessary to even have a law against it but in my opinion it is very necessary for society today. Yes, I know some will argue that restrictions for gun restrictions are “unconstitutional” since the second amendment states that all citizens have rights to bear to arms. An excerpt from ProCon.org explains that,”Michael Waldman, JD, President of the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law, stated there is nothing about an individual right to bear arms in the notes about the Second Amendment when it was being drafted, discussed, or ratified; the US Supreme Court declined to rule in favor of the individual right

Indeed, the United States has a long tradition of holding guns. The public opinion with guns is deeply based. A survey conducted by the Pew Research Center in 2017 showed that 48% of the population grew up in armed families; 72% believed that most people should have the right to have

Gun control is becoming an increasingly prevalent issue in today’s world. Multiple mass shootings occurring over the world have spurred a multitude of people and politicians to think and speak about this issue. For instance, the Las Vegas Shooting, which occurred on October 1, 2017, was the deadliest shooting in American history, killing 59 people and injuring more than 500. The Second Amendment states that people have the right to bear arms, but this phrase has been interpreted in different ways. Of course, not everyone has the same viewpoint on this pressing, yet complicated issue. Liberals, closely affiliated with the Democratic Party, believe that the Second Amendment does not grant people the right to bear arms. Instead, the states can have militias that can bear arms, and it is their job to protect the people. Due to this, they believe that there should be stricter gun control laws, and that people owning guns will cause more attacks involving guns. On the other hand, conservatives, associated with the Republican Party, interpret the Second Amendment in a way that people have the right to own guns. They believe that people are allowed to own guns and can protect themselves in times of despair. Conservatives strongly contradict the liberals when they say that owning guns will cause more gun violence; they believe the exact opposite. Recent events have once again brought this topic into the spotlight of news channels and the Internet.

Guns have always been a large part of the American culture, and are becoming a more controversial topic due to recent incidents. Over the past century gun problem has been a considerable debate in the United States. Guns are too easily accessible, they should either be restricted or strictly regulated. Guns also allow people to commit suicide. Another problem why gun contol should be imposed is to protect women from domestic abuse. Yes, the II Amendment says ''A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to bear arms, shall not be infringed''. The intention of this amendment was to protect the right of militias to bear arms, not the right of individuals. Guns supporters love to cite and twist the 2 Amendment for their own convenience and justify the right to carry a weapon. Along the way, conservatives has shifted the meaning of the 2 Amendment to justify any inidividuals own a weapon easily.

Some pro gun control activists would have you believe that all guns do is murder innocent people but there are countless stories of women using guns to stop rapists or homeowners detailing home invaders with guns. It goes without a doubt that the woman would have been raped, or the family would have been robbed, however with the ability to possess guns these such tragedies are preventable for all families. Gun control can’t touch illegal guns and gun control only disarms legal citizens, and gun control is an attack on the second amendment.