Argumentative Essay On Racial Profiling

Decent Essays

Racial profiling, by definition, is recognized as the use of race or ethnicity as grounds for suspecting someone of having committed an offense. The controversy of racial profiling is prominent all over the United States, as well as the rest of the world. Being as controversial as it is, the issue of racial profiling was discussed by two different authors, each addressing their own conflicting viewpoints. James A. Kowalski and J. Angelo Corlett each wrote an article presenting their opinions on the issue, using very different yet somewhat similar writing techniques. Kowalski, a dean of the Cathedral Church of Saint John the Divine in NYC, wrote the article, “Racial Profiling is Morally Wrong and Based on False Assumptions.” He holds the strong belief that racial profiling is morally wrong, and should not occur in society. On the contrary, J. Angelo Corlett wrote the article, “Racial Profiling is Morally Justifiable in Certain Circumstances.” Corlett, a professor of philosophy at San Diego State University, a strong believer in racial profiling, argues that the act of racial profiling can be beneficial at times. While both articles were persuasive and informative, there were prominent differences, as well as similarities in the writing styles. There were multiple similarities through the use of rhetorical strategies and patterns such anecdotes and classification and division. Key differences in the two opposing articles, however, is the authors’ use of exemplification and

Get Access