Argumentative Essay On Secondhand Smoke

The image itself, is trying to get a reaction from those who smoke and those trying to help someone quit. In the picture, you can clearly see a cigarette pack with cigarettes inside dressed as crayons. This is giving the audience an impression that children see cigarettes as something they could use every day. Not only is it bringing it back to children, the child’s writing is specifically saying just like mommy. ASH is tugging at the emotions of those who smoke who are parents as well and see that what they do in front on their child affects their child in the long run. In addition, under the writing there is a simple sentence that states, “Children whose parents or siblings

This advertisement was clearly designed to conjure a response from its audience, which are both smokers and non-smokers alike. In the non-smoking audience, the image will either increase their distaste of smoking and its negative health effects, or they will be unconcerned because it has little or no effect on them or their lives. The audience it would appeal most to is the people who vehemently oppose cigarettes and smoking. People like this may believe that anti-smoking ads will reach smokers and somehow convince them to quit, but this is probably not the case. To smokers, the image will be a reminder of the harm they are doing to their bodies. But for the most part, they will likely be indifferent to the image because they already know it’s bad for their health, and will continue to smoke because they are either addicted or are just apathetic to the situation. They may even find ads such as this obnoxious and unoriginal because they feel as if it’s repetitive and a personal attack on them and their views and habits. Because smoking is seen as such a bad thing in U.S. society, they may detach themselves from advertisements that contradict what they believe is okay.

When the video shows small children holding a cigerette and asking for a lighter to light their cigarette, the author is using pathos to appeal to the audience emotions. Smoking is known to cause many illnesses; so if you were to see a child smoking, it might make you sad, worried or even frustrated. Children are often thought of as pure and inosent and

The ad uses pathos, a rhetoric strategy to target the emotions of its viewers, by using a smoking toddler as the focus of it. Seeing a young child smoking a cigar will draw the attention of viewers of any age, gender, or race. The image will cause its audience to investigate the purpose of the ad. It makes people feel sorrow for the young, innocent child that doesn’t know what he is doing, and to feel disgust for his parents for their irresponsibility. Like most of their ads, PETA caused a lot of controversy with this image. Not only did people feel sad for the child but they were outraged at the ridiculous image. Now that PETA has their attention, they will investigate the purpose of the image. Its purpose could be of many things including: secondhand smoke, insufficient parenting, or cancer. When looking closer, they realize that the ad is meant to stop them and their children from eating animals by claiming that it results in the same physical diseases as smoking does. What they don’t realize is that using such outrageous content is how PETA gets their message across; The more controversial, the more people will talk about it and the more light that gets shed on the purpose of their organization.

We know that smoking is bad and what ingredients they put in a cigarette, but why do people still do it. This advertisement was called by many throughout the internet, “the best anti-smoking ad ever”. This campaign filmed children walking up to adult smokers, asking them for a light. Every adult took the opportunity to remind the children

My ad for an anti smoking campaign shows a picture of a baby smoking a cigarette as half the baby 's face is decaying. To the right of this image there is text that states," I smoke second hand." Right below that in smaller text is a warning that reads, "Warning: may kill your baby." After closely analyzing this image I found that the argument for this advertisement is: Smoking not only effects you but the people around you too. This ad is very effective due the fact that the distinctive feature of the argument convinces the audience that smoking is unhealthy even second hand smoke.

Looking at the image of her teeth makes you hurl. Her mouth left open. Makes her look like she is breathing onto you. Leaving you with a foul-smelling breath. You feel trapped and want to escape from this image. Burned into your brain of how cigarettes can change your image, who you are. It even reminds you of other advertisements, even people you know and how they changed. It makes you feel depressed and despair for your friends and family who breath these carcinogens in. What cigarettes are doing to their body. All the awful things that may happen to them. You feel fear and discourage to try cigarettes. If you feel this way, the advertisement was

First let’s talk about the image itself and what it symbolizes. To elaborate, the image has a very dark background which could imply a darkening death that the cigarette leads or a path that should not be traveled on. The feeling most viewers may get from just the background is pain, fearfulness, guilt or failure. Also, the main attraction is, the cigarette. The way it

Smoking continues to be an increasing problem in both the United States and around the world. Advertisements of many types continue to aid in lowering the use of cigarettes by teenagers. In this advertisement, published by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), many rhetorical devices are used to help appeal to the audience’s senses, understanding, and perception on smoking cigarettes. Using a young woman in the advertisement shifts the focus towards teenagers that smoke cigarettes, have thought about smoking, or have been around others that do smoke. With the incorporation of the FDA’s “The Real Cost” campaign logo, facts about the outcome of smoking, and the photograph of the young girl's face, this advertisement serves the purpose of grabbing the attention of teenagers that use cigarettes and warns them of the negative outcomes of smoking by using certain appeals: ethos, pathos, and logos.

Overall the advertisers who created this advertisement did a very good job. Through the use of an optical illusion, use of text and the use of negative space it sold the abstract emotion of “parental guilt” effectively. Many parents of young children who see this will look at it and will feel guilty about smoking and will most likely cause them to kick their bad habit of smoking for the sake of their children. Many people don’t like to kick their bad habits because they don’t have a strong reason to, they typically always need someone important to do it for and this advertisement shows parents of young children that your child is your biggest reason you should quit smoking, a child the most important person in a parent’s life and they would be able to do anything to protect

Commercials are used to target a wide variety of audiences and the television is the perfect way to do so, however this particular commercial is targeting a much more specific audience. Its main audience is teens and young adults. We know this for many reasons; one is the teens in the classroom. Another is the use of a hideous creature to represent the cigarettes. Teens who may be in the situation to choose to smoke or using smokeless tobacco will see these visual representations of what they are putting into their bodies and turn the other way. Another possible audience could be adults and parents. They are less

Throughout this, the advertisement will reveal the danger of smoking cigarettes and promote smokers to quit. The ad was created to invoke a response from its audience which is smokers and non-smokers. In the non-smoking audience, the ad will try to decrease their compulsion to smoke. After witnessing the anti-smoking commercial and seeing the harmful health conditions former smokers are in, non-smokers shouldn’t want to be in that position. Others may feel as if this ad doesn’t concern them because they don’t smoke or it has little to no effect on their lives. This group may also feel that this video should convince smokers to want to quit, but it’s most likely not the case. To smokers, the image will only remind them of what harm they’re doing to their bodies. Smokers would also become apathetic to the commercial because they’re already informed about the consequences and addiction of smoking. Smokers may also look at the advertisement as a personal attack simply because smoking is viewed as such a bad thing in the United

Cigarette smokers appear be the pin pointed audience that the company is trying to target. Visually the image is trying to say that smoking shows by using unpleasant images that seemed to be layered over a healthy woman. It’s obvious that the authors are implying that cigarettes do this because they have a cigarettes placed on the women’s hand. All these tools used to show the indented purpose of informing do the job pretty well. Not only does it make you realize how damaging smoking can be, but it makes you not ever want to lay a finger on those cancer causing sticks

What is secondhand smoke? Secondhand smoke is a mixture of the smoke from an actively burning cigarette and can also be the smoke exhaled from a smoker. There are two different types of secondhand smoke: Side stream smoke which comes directly from burning tobacco and also Mainstream smoke which is the smoke that the person smoking inhales. Although the smoke that the smoker inhales is very dangerous and harmful to the body, the smoke off of a burning cigarette actually contains more harmful substances due to the smoke not being filtered when coming off of the end of the cigarette. The people being harmed the most by secondhand smoke happens to be children. Children have no choice but to endure the secondhand smoke coming off of their

The authors point out how anti-smoking advertisements do not send a clear message to the students to understand how smoking can impact their health. It seems that the advertisements trick people by sending the wrong message, such as demonstrating that smoking is not as bad as it seems that the more the students see those advertisements, the more propense for the students to smoke. The source is relevant to my hypothesis because it demonstrates that teenagers are unaware of the health consequences that they can get. The author’s goal is for teenagers to understand anti-smoking messages are not explicit and are not demonstrating a clear understanding of the risks that smoking cause. The authors conclude that new advertisements need to be more carefully evaluated for teenagers to recognize that their intentions reflect undesirable outcome in the antismoking advertainments for teenagers to understand smoking and the inevitable result that can be provoked due to smoking.