The introduction of media has significantly impacted the way candidates campaign during the United States presidential debate cycles. While mainstream media outlets (i.e. televised newscasts, radio broadcasts) have played an important role in providing live coverage of events in which candidates spoke about their platforms, the purpose of the media was completely altered with the introduction of social media, specifically Twitter. While journalism was meant to be an unbiased practice, Twitter and other social media sites have taken on the role of a biased news source, forever changing presidential elections in the process.
Out of the variety of news sources such as TV, radio, or newspapers, one of the popular sources in today’s world is social media. People are getting addicted to and can’t live without social media such as Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram. They use social media as of where they can post their status but also where they can receive a lot of different news. While social media are spreading any kinds of news such as trend, celebrity or even politics, people easily get the information that is not true called “fake news.” The fake news raises the major problem in social media as the news source. Once people see the news, they tend to believe and share it. Liking can spread out fake news in a second. When people like the news, the activity
Monica Anderson and Andrea Caumont investigate how social media sites are reshaping the news and their effectiveness in engaging their audience. The authors posed five questions in their article, considering how social media users participate in and discover news, as well as the impact of social media on discussion of news events. Anderson and Caumont found that social media users are very likely to share news stories, discuss the events, and even share their own coverage of a news event. They also found that users often spend more time on a news site if they arrived there directly, rather than through a social media site. Finally, the authors state that social media can stifle one’s willingness to share their own opinion and discuss a news event. The authors obtained these conclusions by utilizing data from the Pew Research Center. This source is useful to my research topic as it sheds light on the ability of social media to encourage discussion of news stories.
When social media became a popular marketing tool, I was hesitant to jump on the bandwagon. I thought that sitting at a computer and typing was too easy, and it was hard to believe that money could be made without face-face conversions with customers.
Social media has transformed the way that news is gathered and distributed. Social media users seek the news through social media sites; for example, 64% of the U.S. Adults use Facebook and about half of those users get news from Facebook. The users of social media also diffuse the news and participate in news circulation by sharing news stories, images, videos, and discussions posts about a news or event, nearly 46% of social network site users have discussed a news issue (Anderson & Caumont, 2014). Furthermore, social media sites have increased the accessibility to news and now 62% of U.S. adults, which is about 6-in-10 Americans, get news from social media. There are varieties of social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube,
In this age, the traditional method of news delivery is dead. Gone are the days when newspapers and television news anchors were the primary source of information. In today fast paced society, no person has the time to read a newspaper or watch a news segment. Most individuals receive their news from social media. Social media provides a stage on which any one person could inform others on what occurs around them that they might be blind to. According to Ethan Zuckerman, author of Rewire: Digital Cosmopolitans in the Age of Connection, “Social media’s significance is that it is recognising different incidents that might have gone unnoticed and sewing them together as a coherent whole”(qtd, in Day). A single trending topic on Twitter can convey the ideas of a movement and create a global conversation about the topic within a matter of minutes. Such conversation would have not occurred without the help of social media. Ideas flow freely through countries and now reach more and more people. Social media has been able to aide movements such as the Black Lives Matter to broadcast the injustices being committed to a global audience. The Black Lives Matter movement has been able to show to the world the inhumane and unjust treatments of African-Americans in present day America by posting videos of unarmed African-American men being killed by police officers. Due to its overwhelming online
Kaye is the professor in the School of Journalism & Electronic Media at the University of Tennessee-Knoxville. She studies the effects media has on consumers and how they use new technologies to get their information. Thomas J. Johnson got his Ph.D. at the University of Washington and he researches how people’s political attitudes and behaviors are affected by digital and social media. The topic discussed in the article is the influence media platforms have on the public’s interpretation on politics, which are the areas of expertise and research that the two authors work on. Kaye studies the technologies behind presenting information and Johnson studies the effects media can have on people’s attitudes and behaviors. This validates them both as credible sources. The article is published in a journal that specifically discusses broadcasting and electronic media, which also acts as the authors’ targeted audience––people familiar and interested in broadcasting and media. This is interesting, when the article talks about how some people can be tunnel visioned into believing only some sources and exposes the audience they’re writing
The ability to access credible information is paramount. No matter what time of medium a person access (radio, television, newspaper, the internet, or social media), people should take responsibility and decide how much to information to believe. For example, social media websites like Facebook influences over 400 million users a day (Peiyu & Arnott, 2013). Websites as such allows users to access others affiliated in various interest groups around the world. Some people believe that media outlets abuse and manipulate the truth to confuse active media users. Today, studies prove different approaches to decide and control how readers should process new information is as the truth.
There are many opportunities social media offer, for example it gives users the ability to reach out to a large audience. The process of reaching out to a large audience is cost free however it will take time as not everyone is successful at going viral. Another opportunity social media brings is the chance to communicate with consumers, in reality it may be hard to find the chance to speak to someone in the company you’re interested in investing therefore social media makes it easier as it gives direct access to people such as direct messaging, with this they would be able to give feedback on the product they purchased maybe to recommended and suggest new ideas or improvements. Social media is also a creative way to create bonds with their consumers, they can create relationships with consumers, fans and followers, and this will help build trust and loyalty meaning if the customers feel like they are involved with a business they are likely to stay with them.
In today’s society, millennials and the like have experienced life surrounded by the media. However, the types of media consumed have caused an evolutional brainwashing. Most people under 35 spend their time on social media while their parents are still reading newspapers or experiencing the reported news themselves. The key to this phenomenon is the idea that news is prioritized in accordance with real world issues. The layouts of newspapers dictate real world events by getting people out from in front of a computer screen and interacting with news as it happens around them, metaphorically speaking. Meanwhile, social media is organized by the repetitive patterns of the user. With the nature of technology being notorious for scams and sneakiness,
Throughout this essay I have selected to focus on the difference of news we see on social media websites such as Facebook and Twitter to what we’re being presented with on traditional media platforms such as television and radio and which of the two is more likely to have an influence on us as citizens who are consuming the news.
The top ten most followed twitter users are not media organizations or corporations, but individuals. Researchers and Cornell and Yahoo analyzed how information spreads from media to the masses. They found that a new class of semi-public individuals consisting of authors, bloggers, journalists, and subject matter experts have become part of an important niche on twitter. Opinion-leaders are more exposed to the media than their followers and are part of the intermediate layer. Around half of the information originating from the media passes to the masses indirectly through the opinion leaders (Wu, Mason, Hofman, & Watts, 2011).
There is a transformation happening today that is completely changing the way that we do things. The ways that we are communicating are shifting from face to face interactions to short, interactive messages. Technology seems to be making it easier to stay connected, but it is restricting our interactions with others and leading to isolation.
In this age of social media, we are constantly worried about being popular. We are driven by “likes,” “comments,” and “followers.” Not caring what our peers thought, our middle school selves posted anything and everything. Now, as seniors and having had access to social media for an abundance of years, we are far more cautious about what we post but not in the way you might imagine. Instagram is a resourceful tool but, if used incorrectly, could impair your social status.
Over the decade our generation has become more and more into Social Media. We can post any picture, tweet about our daily lives and comment on everything. However, as you pose for a picture, or tweet about something that happened to you, do you ever think if it interferes with the First Amendment? Most people do not consider that, and sometimes what they posted can lead them into a lot of trouble because it could violate the first amendment. Many argue that first amendment grants us the freedom of speech; however, to what extent should our activity on social media be protected as free speech under the first amendment? The people’s activity on social media should be protected as free speech unless the activity is determined to be an actual threat towards someone because there are different interpretations, our comments reflect our opinions, and the right of free speech is the foundation of our country and forms what this country is about.