Argumentative Essay On Syrian Civil War

“Security forces opened fire, killing at least four protesters and within days, the protests grew into rallies that gathered thousands of people.” The killings of these four were ultimately regarded by many as the first deaths of the Syrian uprising.

In syria there has been a war going on for the past 6 years. Throughout thoses 6 years family and kids have been driven from their homes. This conflict started when the syrian people and there goverment. From country and theri people involved.

In March of 2011, Syrian citizens peacefully protest about the arrest and torture of group of teenagers who had written anti-government graffiti on a wall. Instead of President Bashar al-Assad listening to the people, he responded with violence. This led up to the uprising of rebels, and the Syrian Civil War. Though what is truly fueling the violence in Syria?

On Friday night, the University of Washington played host to three of today’s greatest historians concerning the Israel/Palestine issue. Professor Anita Shapira, known for her contextual history of Israel ignited the room with her powerful comments about the circumstances for Arab removal from Israeli lands. Professor James Gelvin tiptoed on several touchy subjects, reiterating his concentration with causality history, nevertheless his historical background gave insight to nationalistic movements both groups have. The third historian, Professor Ilan Pappe concentrated the bulk of his talk on explaining the movement of Palestinian refugees while advocating for the acknowledgement of Israeli brutality in some Arab villages. Naturally, as it was the first time all three sides had come head-to-head, the debate got heated. This was especially true when comparing ideas of what the occupied territory should be described as. History of Modern Israel/Palestine student Erika Arias was able to mediate the debate, defuse tensions and at times draw laughs from the audience.

For many ongoing years now, Syria has been in a war with thousands of fleeing refugees, terrorists that could be attacking at any minute, and the constant involvement of other countries that has done more harm than their planned good. I believe that the foreign involvement of countries such as the US and Russia have fueled more of the ongoing violence in Syria.

“a really, really tough case” that defies historical parallels. Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War refers to political, military and operational support to parties involved in the ongoing conflict in Syria that began in March 2011, as well as active foreign involvement. Most parties involved in the war in Syria receive various types of support from foreign countries and entities based outside Syria. The ongoing conflict in Syria is widely described as a series of overlapping wars between the regional and world powers, primarily between the U.S. and Russia as well as between Iran and Saudi Arabia.

War in Syria DBQ Essay In Syria Have you ever wondered what is it like to live in Syria or the Middle East? When living in Syria there are five different militant groups in the Middle East which is ISIS, PYD, Jabhat al- Nusra, FSA, and the Assad Regime.

The Iraq War started in 2003. The war was a protracted armed conflict that began with the invasion of Iraq by a coalition led by the United states. This ultimately led to overthrowing Saddam Hussein’s government.

The Iraqi war was highly unjustified, the imposition of the American forces in the Iraqi soil was uncalled for, and it bred a lot of hostility between the Middle East and the United states that resulted in acts of terrorism against the United States. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi people were killed including civilians

If Americans do take in refugees, this will have little to no help to Syria. This will benefit the refugees, but taking in Syrian refugees doesn’t help the Syrian civil war or the war against the multiple terror groups in Syria. Furthermore, this will decrease the population, which can potentially harm the country. As of 2013, the population of Syria is 22.8 million. Since 2011, 11 million people have been displaced from their homes. Not all these people have left the country, but many of them have, and are refugees looking for a home. This does not help Syria’s current situation, because if they lose population it could hurt their country even more. If we take in Syrian refugees, this will offer very minimal help for Syria.

Listening to Republicans on Capitol Hill gush over President Trump’s Thursday evening decision to send nearly 60 high-tech Tomahawk missiles to damage a relatively low-tech Syrian airbase, an observer would be easily led to believe that Trump had in that moment transmogrified from a Boy President to a Man President. His Bar Mitzvah moment.

There are many moral reason America has to help the Syrian refugees. Niskanen Center.org stated, “ During World War II, the U.S. turned away Jews due to security concerns. We sent shiploads back to the camps because we were scared that Nazi spies

The United States is nearly $18.5 trillion in debt and can hardly support its own citizens, let alone a new influx of Syrian refugees. This year, it cost the U.S. $1.1 billion to bring 70,000 refugees to our country, which is roughly $15,714 per person (Somanader). Those who claim that the U.S. is behind in their efforts to assist Syrians during this crisis are very wrong; the U.S. government has been, and is currently, leading the world in response to the issue at hand, providing $4.5 billion towards healthcare and basic necessities for those suffering in Syria and its neighboring countries. We are already “the world’s largest bilateral donor of humanitarian aid” and simply cannot afford to use our resources to both

The United States has a history of offering help when it comes to other country's domestic issues. As of right now, there is a civil war going on in Syria due to issues concerning how their government should be run. According to the ideological perspectives of Woodrow Wilson, which many of our recent presidents, such as Bill Clinton, George Bush, and Barack Obama, seemed to follow is the advancement in spreading democracy and capitalism to impoverished countries. Because of the moral and ethical issues concerning the situation in Syria, it is very difficult to make a decision when it involves the lives of many people. However, if one were to incorporate the actions this country has made in the past, such as with what went on in Vietnam, it would definitely be for the best if the U.S. did not take part in the Syrian conflict.

Especially if we can’t house them and allow them to work. This is similar to the Ebola outbreak during 2014, in terms of helping the Liberians, or not helping them. If we didn’t help out the ill Liberian people during the Ebola outbreak, we might not be on good terms with the country of Liberia. This would cause us to lose many from the disease, and we couldn’t be allies with the country of Liberia. Different countries have to stick together through tough times. Plus, We are all considered family, and family help one another out during dark and depressing times. In this case, the U.S needs to be the bigger person (or country in this case), and help out the younger siblings (Syrian refugees). America is considered as one of, if not, the most powerful country in the world, and we have the power to help anyone in need. If we don’t help out, it looks like we didn’t try, or that we didn’t care for the situation at hand. The reputation of the U.S could be ruined, if we don’t intervene and help out the refugees during this