Argumentative Essay On Syrian Refugees

Can you imagine that your little town is being attacked or even a natural disaster may be occurring and you have nowhere to go? What would you do? How would you survive? You would have to flee your home away from the tragic disaster. You would have no place to call home and all you would have is the clothes on your back. Some in the process of leaving their town never get to see their family again and are lucky if they survive. This is why I believe that refugees should be allowed into the United States under certain conditions. These include having a positive background, being eligible for a job and respecting our nation as well as the people in it. As the US turns refugees away, thousands of lives are being taken away. We could easily help them by taking them into our country. Although some people that enter the country may commit crimes, that doesn’t mean we should turn all of them away. It would cause way more harm than good. Most crimes that happen in the United States are caused by the people that are US citizens rather than the refugees. All of these innocent lives are just being taken away and as many Americans sit back and do nothing about it. When we could be out there saving lives. Our country has to step in and do something about this serious situation. There are solutions we could use to solve these problems by making sure all people that enter this country are good at heart. Outside of very few exceptions our country is mainly made up of refugees and

Everyday, people all over the world are removed from their homes and forced to leave. You could be pushed out of your house from a foreclosure, or pushed out of your country from an extremist. In society today, thousands upon thousands of people are fleeing to a new country they can call “home” and where they can feel safe. Among these people, a big majority are the Syrian people. The Syrian Refugee Crisis has been relevant for about four years since the start of the Syrian civil war that began in March 2011, and is comparable to the Native Americans being pushed from their home lands. The Syrian Refugee Crisis equates to the Trail of Tears because both Syrians and refugees alike were pushed out of their homes, they were both forced to find

The utterly diminished and persistently conflicted regime of Bashar Al-Assad has led to several forces, including numerous rebel groups, Kurdish forces, and even ISIL to occupy the war-torn country of Syria in a seemingly never-ending ruination. Most importantly however, it has also led to millions of Syrians becoming dislodged between the remnant regions with the deaths of roughly half a million citizens, according to the Syrian Centre for Policy Research, from a civil war that originated due to a series of protests and differentiating ideologies. The situation has lead for surviving Syrians, now properly known as refugees, to seek asylum in neighboring countries in Europe, but even including some countries as far as in the Western Hemisphere, particularly the United States.

Words used everyday by our media and our highest politicians. We hear it uttered with condescension and tainted by fear.[b] But essentially ‘asylum seekers, refugees, boat people’ is what will determine our country's federal election. But many people in this room may not actually know what these 3 phrases really mean[c]. Are these people that seeking a better life, trying to be free and do what’s best for their families. Similarly maybe even searching for health care and resources, perhaps even fleeing from persecution or something else that is out of their control.

Last September, four year old Shahad was found in the rubble of a bombing site in Western Syria. Seven of her family members were killed in the incident.Now in a Lebanese refugee camp, Shahad and her remaining family members are struggling to survive. These are the families that the United States has the potential to help. The potential to let into our country. The potential to offer these types of families a proper education, because we, unlike them, have enough resources. We should let the Syrian refugees into our country.

Many Syrians became refugees after the terrorist group ISIS appeared in their country. In fact, 1 million out of 28 million Syrians are refugees. One out of fifty refugees are thought to be members Syrians coming into Texas. Refugees need help and I believe that we are obligated to give it to them because we are humans.

Have you ever felt like you were an outsider? Like when you were in school, and you wanted to join in a game of football or soccer but no one would let you play. This is how the Syrian refugees feel right now. But I however, think that United states should not let the Syrian refugees in for the fact that there could be terrorist hiding within the group, it is actually more effort than it is actually worth, and finally we have peoples of our own people to deal with first off.

According to Syrianrefugees.eu, Since June 6 ,2011, Syrian refugees have been pouring out of Syria, into the countries of turkey, Lebanon, Jordan, and 26 other countries,even the United States of America. Inquisitr News states, that their are over 4 million refugees seeking sanctuary from the civil war going on in the Middle East. This makes it very easy for an isis member or jihadist to infiltrate and blend in with the refugees that just want a chance at a new life for them and their families. The cost of feeding and caring for them is alarming and would put the United States even more in debt than we already are, which is 19.8 trillion dollars.If allowing Syrian refugees into America threats or puts the lives of American citizens in danger, and cause our economy to suffer than it already has then the american people must not allow this to happen.

The United States should continue take in Syrian refugees at a high rate because it is a humanitarian gesture for the people uprooted by war and crisis. The United States has been accepting refugees systematically since 1980, when the Refugee Act passed. The goal of the Refugee Act was to create a uniform procedure with which to provide these opportunities to refugees. Since early 2011, Syria’s civilians have been suffering from the effects of their country’s Civil War. The United States provides a safe haven for babies, kids, teens, and adults who are impacted by the war tragedy.

America is a country that is very powerful, and because of its supremacy, it is the leader of the free world. And as the top country in the world other nations look upon it when they’re in need. Although America has brought in many immigrants, a number of thirty one states have declined the recent immigration of Syrian Refugees. Deciding not to bring in refugees who are suffering in another country isn’t the way a leading country should operate. The crisis in Syria wasn’t something the Syrians could control, as a result the innocent are punished and left in tragedy. These civilians are left without homes, food and other necessities. Because of incidents like the terrorist attack in 2001, I understand that America has been put in a certain situation where they can’t trust certain people, but if they used things such as background checks and other methods to find out exactly who they’re letting into the country there won’t be a negative effect that comes from it.

If America were controlled by savage religious terrorists who wanted the world to end, what would a person do? Of course, a person’s first thought would be to fight back, but what if the civilians could not do anything? What if the people who took over America were ruthless and anyone who did not pledge to their religion would have his head cut off? The next probably be to flee the country and go to a safe location. The concept to move would defiantly be put into action as thousands of people would flock to countries such as England, Australia, and France. The truth is currently twenty-seven republican American governors are strongly pushing executive orders saying no Syrian refugees can come to their states. These states include Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Massachusetts, and Texas, just to name a few (Panic). This is a bewildering order to push considering the majority of people in Syria just want to escape the tragedy they are experiencing back home. Because America is the home of the free, and throughout history, has become a beacon for refugees all over the world, all Americans officials should accept the Syrian refugees into America.

As you walk down the street from the grocery market, cruel words ring out and fill the air. You feel a slight tug at your black suit as your mom tells you to rush into the house. Coming from a bad environment, many refugees are perceived as a threat, and they weren't allowed to enter the United States. Still, Jews weren't welcomed, while many Syrian refugees are granted an entrance. While Syrians and Jews were wrongfully labeled as a threat, the Syrians are permitted to enter the U.S. while the Jews weren't.

Syrian refugees should not be allowed into the United States.we already have many immigrants coming in legally and illegally. The United States already has an overflow of the population and we still have problems that we have not fixed, so why should we fix the Syrian’s problem. We have no idea if the Syrians will attack us or not, once they get into our country, they will also have a possibility to take our jobs.

A refugee by definition is a person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster. Currently, in our world, there is a war in Syria. The people in this country are having their homes destroyed and watching their family and friends die. There is a crisis going on because they're attempting to leave their country and find a safe place to live. The problem is that other countries aren't allowing them to enter. The same thing happened to the jews during WWII. Many countries didn't accept the Jews integrating into their society. Many Jews died from the Jewish refugee crisis. Should we let the same thing happen today with the Syrian refugee crisis? The US needs to open the borders to the Syrian

Asylum seekers in Australia always been the focal point of negative political concern for a long time. To stop asylum seekers continue arriving in Australia by boat, Australia enforces the policy of obligatory detention of asylum seekers, unauthorised asylum seekers arriving by boat will be sent to Papua New Guinea camp where operated by the Australian government (‘Asylum seekers: Australia’s shame’ 2017). However, this policy was reported as disgraceful because of the deficient living condition, indefinite and arbitrary of detention and lack of health care (United Nations 2017). Cohen (2011 p. 242) stated that moral panic could be more likely to develop in anything associated with 'immigration, migrants, multicultural absorption, refugees, border controls and asylum seekers’. Is Australia's response to asylum seekers an example of moral panic? By analysing the five criteria from the moral panic theory by looking at the Australian public reaction to asylum seekers with references support, it could be found that the reaction to asylum seekers in Australia is an example of moral panic.