Argumentative Essay On Virtual Murder

Sociologist and the author, Karen Sternheimer, in her article, “do video games kill?” (2007), argues that media and politicians are quick to blame video games when teens kill. She supports her claim by first talking about politicians and other moral crusaders frequently create “folk devils,” individuals or groups defined as evil and immoral, then both politicians and news outlets felt that video games were the ones to inculpate, also news reports showed little importance to the broader social contexts, and finally dubious about the juvenile justice. Sternheimer’s purpose is to persuade in order to show that video games is not the only explanation as to why teens kill. She creates a professional tone for students, teachers, parents, politicians

In my most recent essay I wrote of the violence attributed to video games in light of various shootings and other tragedies that occurred in the past year or so. In this essay I argued that despite their violent content, video games are not completely to blame for acts of violence committed by children. Throughout this essay I tried to convince the reader by, first, establishing my own credibility with video games, then sharing my own experiences with violent games, and providing both empirical data and valuable insight from trusted sources.

Sternheimer brings up an issue that had an unnerving newspaper headlines like “Bloodlust Video Games Put Kids in the Crosshairs” (215). She thinks that not enough thoughts have been given to other issues like “social rejection and depression”. Information on statistical evidence was brought to our attention. Sternheimer believed it to be “controversial”. Sternheimer feels that there are important facts that truly cause killers at a young age that are being over looked. The important facts could include personal traits, family, and background. Politicians claims for the rise of video games concerns. Sternheimer briefly wrote a law suits to the producers and none of the law suits won. Have you ever thought why there are young killers, which are brought in suburban areas/families who are thought of to be the most

For fans of the Netflix documentary, Making a Murderer, Brendan Dassey’s recent ordered release from prison may come as good news.

Video games are prevalent among impressionable children and teenagers. There has been a great deal of controversy surrounding the violent themes used in video games. Teenage shootings in schools have led society to question the relationship between video violence and criminal activity. After considerable research, expert opinions, and research findings, the American Psychological Association found that there is no link between gaming and criminal behavior (Casey). With this, the pursuit of video violent games continues to grow in our society. With games that show execution style murders, blood oozing from gunshot wounds, and victims moaning from wounds, it certainly is gratifying for the indulgent player. The ongoing concern about aggression and violence has once again been proven to be non-existent (Alert). My thoughts are that this cartoon like violence is appeals to the need for violence in an artificially designed environment. In this manner, violence is contained within the boundaries of fantasy. This is unlike “The Crucible” which occurs in with real people, events, and situations. Thus, directing violence in the realm of societal dysfunction that has endured with

In the United States, the use of the death penalty continues to be a controversial issue. Every election year, politicians, wishing to appeal to the moral sentiments of voters, routinely compete with each other as to who will be toughest in extending the death penalty to those persons who have been convicted of first-degree murder. Both proponents and opponents of capital punishment present compelling arguments to support their claims. Often their arguments are made on different interpretations of what is moral in a just society. In this essay, I intend to present major arguments of those who support the death penalty and those who are opposed to state sanctioned executions application . However, I do intend to fairly and accurately

Video games have become a major occupation of majority of the youth these days. They spend hours on end concentrating on video games, some of which are apparently very violent, yet this is actually the whole idea. Coming from the horse's mouth is an argument in support of video games coined from a video programmer's point of view, stating that violent video games allow people to do what they can not do in reality- virtual reality. ( http://www.theroc.org/roc-mag/textarch/roc-15/roc15-08.htm ) For instance, someone said to be having a bad day could use a violent video game to release stress by shooting down a couple hundred bad men than actually taking an AK-47 and spilling down a few brains down the

People have been playing video games since the late 1970s, but it wasn't until 1999 that we began to question the consequences and influences associated with younger players. Karen Sternheimer's article "Do Video Games Kill" is about the controversial idea that video games are responsible for mass school shootings.

(66) He even makes a point of comparing them to “murder simulators,” and suggests that we are inviting adolescents to enjoy killing, eliminate any resistance to it. (67) While he does concede that there is no direct correlation between the games and most murders, ultimately he says that “if we want to avoid more Littleton-style massacres, we will begin taking the social effects of the killing games more seriously.” (67) This is a controversial subject, of course, and I find that I have a rather different viewpoint than Leo. I do not believe that these so-called killing games have social effects on our youth.

Columbine High School events that happened in 1999 was two of the high school teens who were a lot of time exposed to violent video games. Due to this incident 12 students and one teacher were killed (Vastag 1822). As this incident suggests that which is also observed, with regard to the sale of video games with a loud voice, one side is also supported it or opposed, there is not explain to virtual violence does the impact for children. (Vastag 1822)“Little kids do imitate video games, but the question is whether it leads to real world violence,” (Vastag 1822) said Juliet Van Eenwyk, PhD, who studies the issue for the Washington State Department of Public Health, Seattle. 2001 literature review by Dr Van Eenwyk and colleagues Lillian Bensley

Although it may be a great way

In Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association (2011), the Supreme Court ruled that certain states could not ban violent video game sales to youths. In the majority statement, it is said that the studies that link aggression in youths and violent video games do not prove that violent video games cause minors to act aggressively. Therefore, since the violence in video games remains in the virtual world, there is no moral issue with people playing these sorts of games--no matter how they play

Moreover, since video game characters are part of the imagination and do not reflect real life then it is easy to say that there is no intent to do any wrong doing in regards to killing and should not be counted as killing in real life. Moreover, video games cannot be denied because people have the right to express themselves and if the way that they decide to express themselves then it should not be discounted and video games should be

I truly see no harm in virtual murder. According to the PBS News Hour (2013), there is no evidence that any violent video game has ever caused a real world violent act. I look at playing these games as a way for children to explore and gain knowledge about the world. In most cases, the child ends up playing the game as the “good guy”, who is fighting the “bad guy” and helping to save the world. I see nothing wrong with this. I think we should be allowing our children to feel like heroes by allowing them to participate in such virtual worlds. When referring to the most advanced games such as Call of Duty or Grand Theft Auto, I would not argue against placing age restriction on these games and I mentioned in my own post, but I do not believe we need to go as far as making them illegal. Unlike virtual paedophilia, I do not think that virtual murder takes away from the innocence of a child. I believe that all players realize that the world they are playing in online is a different world from reality. The players do not act the same way in the real world as they do in the virtual world. In addition, I do not believe that the people who commit murder in real life do so because they have done it in

Playing video games does not cause violent behavior. Don’t get me wrong, some video games show horrific acts of violence. “A recent survey found that 92 percent of U.S. kids--ages 2 to 17--play video games, and their parents bought 225 million of them last year to the tune of $6.4 billion.” (Sider 79).What’s here to argue is that violent video games do not cause violence among children, but the blame for violence should be on the individual and people who should have taught the individual better. If kids are not able to see the difference between reality and fantasy, then they really can’t be blamed for committing acts they see in a game and then imitating, not fully understanding the consequences of doing it in the real world.