Women have always served in the military. In the American Revolution, they were nurses and cooks, then in World War II they were pilots, drivers, and mechanics too. When women died in the wars, leaders started wondering if women should only be in the military in times of crisis (“How Roles Have Changed for Women in the Military.”). Even though women have served for decades, they have not been in combat for very long. In 2013, Leon Panetta lifted the ban on women in combat positions. Then in 2015, it was decided that all combat positions would be open to women, including special units like Navy SEALs (Silva). There are some who think women should not be given this chance. The two sides of if women should be in combat are very different but both have compelling arguments. The people in favor of women being in combat roles have many reasons but there are three main points. If women are as physically capable of being in certain military positions, they should get the same opportunities as men. If women were still kept away from combat, it could limit the choices for the most qualified person for the job. Women and men can both be trained to succeed in certain roles and if there are women who want to serve, why should they be turned away? Their last point was that being in a combat position is often necessary to get a …show more content…
One of the reasons are that it is proven that women are not as strong as men. www.livestrong.com states, “According to the National Strength and Conditioning Association, women generally produce about two-thirds the amount of total strength and applied force that men produce” (Williams). Also, if women are serving, there is an increased risk of rape and sexual abuse. Even though men can experience these things, enemies are more willing to torture female prisoners. One last reason is that women and men serving together will hurt the group’s morale and cohesion (“Women in Combat Pros and
Women serving in the military is a topic that most people have very strong convictions on. Rather you are for or against women serving, you can find strong opinions that support both sides in this contentious dispute. Women have struggled to fit into the military life for years. Even though woman have fought alongside men in each key battle from the start of the American Revolution, they still find it hard to shake the stereo types about woman who serve. Woman have always had to cloak themselves in a masquerade of sorts to serve alongside men. When woman were finally accepted into the military, they were given secondary roles to the men. The Pentagon has just recently began to realize that gender really do not matter on the battlefield. Since the Pentagons enlightenment, one can now see progress in the integration of women in all expanding military careers. Women have always proven that they are not only an asset to the military but they are the strength of the America’s military.
Women now make up 14 percent of the active-duty military in the United States, which is up from 1.6 percent, 25 years prior. (Christian Science Monitor, 1). In 1948, President Truman signed the Women 's Armed Services Integration Act which created the role of women in the military. This law meant that each branch of the service was allowed to have one female Colonel (Byfield, 12). As of 2015, there are many women who serve as Generals and Admirals. All of these roles are non-combative. Even though some women can do anything a man can do, the vast majority can not, therefore making it an unsafe idea to place these women into combat positions.
Historically, military service and fighting in combat have only been available to men, but recently there has been debate about women serving in military combat. In times of war in the United States, men have generally fought as soldiers while women in the
Over the years the United States has grown to love each other as the way people are, especially women. Women have proven to be even stronger than what people expected them to be. You can see the strength, the courage, and the confidence they have gained. It has been discussed many years that women shouldn’t be allowed in combat for not being “strong enough”. Men have shown that they can be “manly” enough to do women or girl things, so why can’t women do “manly” things? If women feel like they can handle being on the frontline then we should respect their decision and allow them to go.
It has been identified that hundreds of families throughout Australia are breaking the law by using medical marijuana (Cannabis) to help treat illnesses and ease chronic pain. To define, the term medical marijuana refers to using the whole unprocessed marijuana plant or it’s basic extracts to treat a disease or symptom. Through analysis of the Internet and other reliable sources, though an illicit drug in Australian society, medical marijuana should be legalised in Australia for medicinal purposes.
Although women should be fighting in front line in the military many believe they should not. More than 200,000 position will still be remain exclusive to men. women won 't be able to qualify for jobs. “They are not going to be able to meet those standards” (Women in the Military: Why Can 't We Serve on the Front Lines). The weapon use in the front line are too dangerous. “women will not be able to handle the big
Women were not allowed to fight in the war. Women mainly supported the war as nurses. So many women are proving that they can do just as well as a man can in any situation, adventure or job. Women are now able to fight in combat side by side with their male comrades. This is especially true in our military.
In Molly M. Ginty’s article “Military Women: All Guts, No Glory” she explores the issue of women who serve in the army and them being included in combat with males, and the inequality they have been through serving in the U.S Armed Forces over numerous years. With new legislating, and there being new roles for females there is always going to be the debate if women should be in combat with men or not. For years’ women who would join the army were just nurses and secretaries, because of people thinking that they are not fit to be in battle. Even though they all go through the same training, the women were put in position to practically serve those who were in battle which were the men. So personally I do agree with women being able to serve
Did you know that women were banned from serving in combat in 1994? It wasn’t until 2013 when the Secretary of Defense removed the military’s ban on women serving in combat. Leon Panetta said “anyone qualified should get a chance to fight on the front lines of war regardless of their sex.” But why were they banned in the first place? Gender should not be an issue in the military. The military should be happy to have the diversity because it gives them options since women do make up 14% of the military.
One of the most evident and thought provoking aspects that we see as consumers on a daily basis is the effect of sales tax. The effect of sales tax vary from the examination of how much this tax can increase our purchases. To why there are higher and lower tax percentages based on different purchases. Knowing that this tax is in place determines the actions of both sellers and consumers. With sales tax continuing to evolve and change certain bills such as the Remote Transaction Parity Act of 2015 have been put into place and action.
Women have played a tremendous role in many countries' armed forces from the past to the present. Women have thoroughly integrated into the armed forces; all positions in the armed forces should be fully accessible to women who can compete with men intellectually and physically.
Ninety percent of all military occupations in the military include all genders, but the top ten percent of roles are excluded to women. Women have already felt the misogyny with unequal pay and unfair treatment by men, now women have to face the discrimination for fighting for our country. Women should be able to serve in the front lines because it makes the military stronger as a whole with more diversity, women in other countries fight on the front lines and women have made significant contributions in the military so far.
Since ancient times, families have parted with their fathers or sons as they went off to war. In some instances, they went as volunteers and in others it wasn’t a choice, but rather a necessity. Generations before mine wouldn’t dream of sending their daughter alongside their son into the front lines, not because women were incapable of the task required of them, but it just wasn’t done. Women used to be viewed as fragile and proper and some people still see women in that way. In past years, the most women were seen fit to do during war time was helping on the home front. But, what’s happening now? Women are fighting, not on the front lines, but in the background and not for their country, but for themselves. Women today are fighting the battle for equality. They reached a milestone in this battle years ago when they reserved the right to vote, but it continues today in a way that even some women don’t want it to. The question being: should women be in combat units? Both men and women are on either side of this argument, so this not your everyday gender disagreement.
worldwide for his literature. By the time Poe was three years old, his parents were both deceased
I am in favor of equality for women, just not when it comes to women in combat. There have been women in society doing heroic things since the Revolutionary war. There have been brave women in war posing as men so they could fight. There are a select few women who could handle war and combat. The negative aspects of women in combat outweigh the positive. Women should not participate in military combat. However they may join the military and served in traditional roles such as nurses and office staff. The difference between men and women is women are physically weaker, they have vital personal needs, and they attract male troops.