Argumentative Essay - Smoking

Smoking is an activity that has been around for many years for people to use and adapt into their lifestyle. It is a tool that many people use to help reduce the stresses of life and put them in a comfortable position that enables them to cope with the hectic lifestyle they are living. However, smoking has been scientifically proven to cause many types of cancer, the most common being lung cancer resulting in numerous deaths across the United States. According to BBC, "Smoking is a greater cause of death and disability than any single disease" (BBC, 2). Evidently, the benefits and drawbacks of smoking have been debated for many years, and only recently have some countries have placed a ban in public places such as Britain and the United

Smoking should be banned in Australia. Smoking is a disgusting habit that many Australians use every single day. The impact of banning smoking altogether in Australia would be a massive favour for everyone. Australian adults who smoke everyday and Australian Secondary Students from the age 12 to 17 smoke over 22 billion cigarettes per year and effecting other people to start smoking because they think it’s a cool way to get attention. But I think that banning it in almost all public places is a great idea but I raise this question to you, “Why not just Ban Smoking?” This question was raised in a ‘The Age’ article in 2013. The main point of the article is, smoking is banned in pretty much all public places and there are often neighbours writing to the council complaining about a smoking neighbour, so why not just ban it altogether?

Smoke does affect not only the smoker but also the individuals who are inhaling the smoke. Many people have understood what it causes or seen the effects of smoking, and yet they still do it. While many places still allow smoking areas, they should be banned because it still dangers the health of individuals who are non-smokers by hurting their lungs and most importantly their

The smokers who choose to bring harm to themselves have the right to damage their health if they choose. The alternatives non smokers have are to not be in presence of smokers. Where public places advertise no smoking, and still supple designated areas for smokers they should still take in account that the smoke still ventilates the surrounding areas. My advice is not to engage where there is no smoking, and smoking areas. The fumes from the non smoking area cannot be contained completely. If you don’t want to stop passive don’t attend these public places. The article on line indicated if there was enough non-smokers going to these public facilities there would be no need to post no smoking () .

Tobacco remains legal and the treasury is said to make around 10 billion each year from taxing it. Coincidentally many states still have smoker-friendly bars. The smoking ban is said to be bad for business as well. Despite more efforts to prove otherwise, pubs and clubs are dying, in part, because of the business lost as smokers find somewhere else to drink they can smoke in peace. Where and how smokers think will always be beyond my understanding. They believe that the smoking ban is technologically backwards. It is not difficult, with decent modern air filtration technology, to make smoke virtually unnoticeable and certainly harmless. The smoking ban does not stop people from smoking. Even if it were appropriate to

Smoking should not be permitted in public areas, since it’s not reasonable to force a non-smoker into inhaling unwanted toxic smokes into his own body. Just like one has the option of being a smoker, they other may have the right to pick the option of not wanting to be a passive smoker.

Banning of smoking in public places, such as restaurants and bars have been very positive outcomes for the recent years. Smoke-free policies do send strong and direct messages to

A health watchdog is to take legal action in California against the manufacturers of some of the best-known brands of e-cigarettes, following tests to establish the levels of toxic chemicals they contain.

Smoking should be banned in and out of the workplace, firstly because it is a recommended agreement by the management and all staff employed have signed an agreement, as this will impact on all workers and will be better for everyone's health and well being.

Smoking bans and restrictions in and around the workplace are proving to be effective in protecting employees from tobacco smoke as well as aiding those who do smoke to quit, by reducing the number of cigarettes they consume during the day.

Smoking is illegal on public transport and in the following public places: healthcare facilities, educational facilities, and places of worship. In other types of public places and in workplaces, designated smoking areas must be provided. With respect to outdoor places, children’s playgrounds must be smoke free. The realization of smoke free places and smoking-restricted places, however, requires passage of laws by local governments. The national law does not set a limit by which local governments must act, so some local governments have passed smoke free legislation while others have not. Sub-national jurisdictions may pass smoke free

In normal conditions i would agree, of the ban, if was in areas where there are sick people, young children but not around adults that do and don't smoke.This applies to only out door not indoors, As for indoors smoking should be banned. Reasons for better well being is needed better ventilation will be; when area is smoke free.

-U.S Department of Health and Human ServicesThroughout the United States, smoking has become very popular amongst all ages. Smoker’s have become very open and public about the issue. But as time goes on, smoker’s are starting to smoke in public. Many people are unbothered by this, but others are disturbed. They are mostly cautious about smoking in public because many have health problems that can be triggered by smoking. Although I can’t tell you what to do with your body, I still believe that smoker’s should not have the right to smoke in public places. One reason is that you introduce others to secondhand smoking. Another

This has been recognised as a major issue for the country and there are several things being done to try to stop it, such as the smoking ban in public places which was enforced on March the 26th 2006. It is now illegal to smoke in pubs, clubs and enclosed places. After a

Although many claim the opposite smoking tobacco has been proved scientifically to be addictive. Addiction is when a person is physically and mentally dependent on a particular substance and is unable to stop taking it without incurring unpleasant effects. Once the body tastes nicotine the addictive chemical found in cigarettes it craves for more. Nicotine creates a pleasurable feeling that appeals to the smoker. However, since nicotine is the only addictive drug in tobacco if extracted from tobacco then tobacco won't be addictive.