Argumentative Essay: The Case For Banning Guns

Gun violence kills 33,000 Americans and injures over 80,000 people per year. It is ridiculous how much damage guns have brought to not only us, but the world itself. From Columbine, to Sandy Hook, to the movie theatre to the Oregon Community College shooting, it has just been ridiculous. This is all because we in America believe it is okay for people to carry guns and for them to be used if “needed”. If they were always banned to begin with, we would never have had this problem. The private ownership of handguns should be banned in the United States. Handguns have been proved to be dangerous to society in recent events, they are the deadliest weapon in America, and lastly, guns cost Americans hundreds of extra dollars that could be avoided if they were banned.

The Second Amendment of the US Constitution protects individual gun ownership. The Second Amendment of the US Constitution reads, "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Gun ownership is an American tradition older than the country itself and is protected by the Second Amendment; more gun control laws would infringe upon the right to bear arms. Justice Antonin Scalia, LLB, in the June 26, 2008 District of Columbia et al. v. Heller US Supreme Court majority opinion syllabus stated, "The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home." The McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) ruling also stated that the Second Amendment is an individual right. Lawrence Hunter, Chairman of Revolution PAC, stated, "The Founders understood that the right to own and bear laws is as fundamental and as essential to maintaining liberty as are the rights of free speech, a free press, freedom of religion and the other protections against government encroachments on liberty delineated in the Bill of Rights."

Sandy Hook Elementary. Aurora, Colorado. San Bernardino, California. Las Vegas, Nevada. Orlando, Florida. (Words with Negative Connotation) These are just some of the biggest mass shootings that have swept America in the past few years. Hundreds of lives are lost each year to gun related violence in the United States alone. Gun control has been a topic in our country since our founding fathers adopted the second amendment to the US constitution. Although recently controversy has sparked to an all-new extent in America due to the recent spike in mass shootings and gun related homicides. So many families and loves ones are affected each year in the United States because of gun related violence and other mass killing events, because of these events gun control laws need to be revamped and strengthened in American in order to protect the citizens.

A good argument must be logical and issue, the premises, and the conclusion must be coherent and complementing each other. And with the endeavor to analyze the validity of an argument the article, “Stop the insanity: Ban guns,” by Gerald Ensley has been reviewed. In this article Ensley has emphasized on the primary issue of banning guns in the United States, and especially handguns (“Stop the insanity: Ban guns”, 2015). Another issue which has been emphasized on is proper background checking before handing over a gun license to an individual (Ensley, 2015). To justify his argument the author has provided some specific premises. Primarily Ensley has cited as premise about the shootings at the Florida State University, the shootings in a northwest

The debate over whether the United States should have stricter gun laws has become a major talking point in our society. However, the clear choice that will bring the most prosperity and security to our country is to maintain the current gun control laws as they are the best option for the USA’s modern society. We must not let the rush to judgement after every shooting spree cloud our minds and glaze over all the benefits and lifestyles that guns let us take for granted. Society must also see what the outcomes are for the other options suggested and to not make the wrong choice and have to live with the consequences. We must not let the government enact laws that would place stricter controls on guns.

Gun control in the United States is a very controversial topic in today’s political society, leaving the nation divided into two sides with two strongly opinionated beliefs. This all started with the increase in the amount of mass shootings and an overall increase in gun violence. The two sides consist of the liberal point of view and the conservative point of view. The liberals believe that the availability of firearms to the people in the country is a major issue, and that the U.S. government is at fault for the mass shootings due to the lenient regulations on guns. In retaliation, the conservatives argue that having a gun is a God given right, that the Second Amendment of The Constitution. Although the availability of guns is seen to be

Gail makes the point that while guns in themselves are a complete danger, she signifies their protection and importance. She states, “letting a terrorist buy a gun or temporarily depriving a person who is not a terrorist of the right to acquire weaponry,” she makes the argument that it is too facile to acquire a gun. I think, instead of creating more or new laws on guns there should be an increase of enforcement on the laws that we already have, they are ignored and undermined. Nicholas Kristof makes the argument that guns are a menace and should be banned entirely due to the mass amount of deaths that have occurred. In the column, “On Guns, We’re Not Even Trying”, Kristof makes the fact, “but just in the last four years, more people have died in the United States from guns than Americans have died in the wars in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq combined.” He does this to state that the death because of shooting is extreme and that there is a way to prevent

. The United State has passed some laws concerning the ownership and use of gun, and more legislation is being considered. Most of this legislation retrain, to an extent, the rights of the people to own or use gun. Some of these constraint may be necessary, but presently some legislation is taking it too far. The community gain from the use guns in the hands of reasonable or responsible citizens. An attempt to stop the use or take away gun use from this community might not do well. As individuals in such community fight for the protection of its people.

In recent years nearly 35,000 people have been killed annually by guns in the United States.  These deaths include 15,000 murders, 18,000 suicides, and 1,500 accidents.2  It is because of these statistics that many would like to ban guns altogether. But is that

With there being almost 300 million guns in America, criminals can easily get a gun illegally. This would put many more people in danger, law abiding citizens would have given up their guns or have them locked away because of gun control laws. “ Criminals would continue finding ways to illegally acquire guns while robbing and attacking law-abiding citizens who suddenly have no means of self-defense.” (Clause). In Australia in 1996, the country did a buy back where they bought the guns of citizen back from them, the total of guns was about 600 thousand (Clause) . If America tried that with almost 300 million compared to 600 thousand it would cost the U.S too much money. In the article from the Clause, it states that mass shooters often acquired guns illegally. The banning of guns will just put law abiding citizens at higher risk and it will be an infringement on the second

Jame Q. Wilson article “ Just take away their guns” Wilson agues some reasons how the elimit of illegal guns . The president and the publics want more gun control laws. but it not mean will stop illegal use of gun. Gun control should me elimit because citizen do not value the right to defend our home and family . they think that a gun is more likely make injury abd hurt.He have example about thre are somw 200 million guns in private ownership, about one third of them handguns. Moreever, Only about one= sixth of the handguns used by serious criminals are purchased. Wilson. lot of prople used guns in Amrican, it can get from stolen,borrowd or privately purchased. Any kind to get guns, we still have method is increase law for gun crime and all

As the debate over gun control continues to spread throughout the nation like the plague, everyone is trying to choose a side. Some argue that their Second Amendment Rights are being infringed on, however, when looked at in detail that is not the case. Many others argue the decrease of guns is not beneficial because criminals are okay with doing illegal things, therefore they will obtain guns anyway. There is much, however, to disprove that. These weapons are the reason why the United States has such a high rate of violence even with such high wealth. The cost of gun violence has continued to rise over the years in medical bills. Criminals should not have the access they are currently have to such destructive weapons. Gun control must be put in place in order to decrease much of the violence and suicides the United States has.

This report analyzes gun control in the United States and evaluates whether guns should be banned.

Guns are an evil tool that can end humanity. Most people are dying due to gun violence. Individuals don’t feel safe anymore. Gun can easily be purchased. Therefore, the U.S should put more restrictions on gun ownership and use for people's safety.

Gun ownership should be banned to reduce the 100,000 deaths of americans that are shot every year in the United States. Throughout America’s history, we have been known as the extremely gun violent country unfit to protect our citizens from danger. The television news reports continue to display the violent crimes and school shootings that has harmed innocent people especially children. When the government allows guns to be legal in the United States, they are giving people the responsibility to use this weapon for self defense purposes and recreational sport such as hunting. However, gun owners have been unable to handle this responsibility