Argumentative Essay: What Are Video Games Art?

Critics against gaming could not manipulate the industries new innovations without a good argument in return. Both representatives grew side by side with the industry. Today the argument still continues of whether video games are a good method for learning or just a waste of time and a bad influence on society.

Although Ebert did not engage with the issue again and his view remains mired in controversy, the notion that video games are ineligible to be considered fine art due to their commercial appeal and structure as choice-driven narratives has proved persuasive for many including video game luminary Brian

The gaming industry has progressed the most in the past century, starting with silent ping-pong games and evolving into intense story plot and battle games liken to Final Fantasy. Games are becoming more and more realistic, characters can talk, blink, jump, wave and move individual body parts, mimicking human behavior. Parental advisory

Video games are a profound art form, incorporating trades and mediums that span the artistic spectrum and beyond. To refute this is to ignore decades of rich history, disregard hours of artful labor, and discredit the immeasurable devotion of many whom worked to perfect this art form. Although video games may not suit every individual’s tastes, one cannot claim with credibility they possess no artistic merit.

Main Point III: For this reason, this has been the focal point of the “video games are art” debate. At the same time, the debate as a whole has had some opposition.

Video games are highly designed with artistic expression in the digital world. There is a

people. They are arguing over videogames being considered a form of art. Some people are on

Video games have come a long way since Pong rid children of their quarters in 1972. In the past few years, a dramatic shift in the publics’ view of games has occured. What was once considered a kid’s toy capable of turning brains into mush is now enjoyed by the average age of 35 (Essential Facts). In recent times, another paradigm shift has begun for gaming: the road to becoming an art form. Today, museum curators from across the globe continue to accept video games into their collection, adding to its legitimacy. However, just as movies struggled to be considered art in the 1970s, the path for video games has not been smooth sailing. Many critics, such as the late Roger Ebert, have been increasingly vocal about their reasoning for why a

In an article titled Video Games Can Never be Art, the author, Roger Ebert, a famous film critic and well known journalist, shares his opinion that video games will never have the same status as other great works. To specify, he claims that ”no video gamer now living will survive long enough to experience the medium as an art form,” (Ebert). He then subsequently explains that the definition of art is “the creation of one artist,” (Ebert) meaning that a dance is an art because of the choreographer, and architecture is art because of the architect. (Ebert) Very early in the article Ebert makes his point exceedingly clear, he states that not only does he consider video games as something not worth his time, but that they will never (in this lifetime,) amount to the works of any great artist such as Michelangelo or Picasso. He then furthermore contrasts art mediums, including composing,

In the article written by Roger Ebert, “Video Games Can Never Be Art”, he discusses his view on why video games should not be considered art. In the beginning Ebert explains why he thinks today’s video games can not compare to modern art, furthermore they will not ever be close to poets or filmmakers work (Ebert). Ebert then brings up the Ted talk with Santiago where he states, “No one in or out of the field has ever been able to cite a game worthy of comparison with the great poets, filmmakers, novelists and poets” (Ebert). What he is trying to say here is that when gamemakers are creating video games they will never equal up to their artistic ability of these different types of artist. Then he mentions how video games are not art because

Personal Response: “Are Videogames Art?” I consider any form of creative production a type of art. Stanton states in his article: “to each their own.” therefore, in my opinion, anything created that can cause a person to become immersed within it and feel some sort of emotion is a form of art, including video games. I don’t typically play games per say, but when I do spend my time playing or even watching games such as “Final Fantasy” I can’t help but feel overcome with emotion when a character dies or when characters fall in love.

Roger Ebert strongly expresses his opinion toward the tense debate on weather video games should be considered art. He expresses his belief by demonstrating in his article how video games could never compare to the amazing writers and the incredible filmmakers (Ebert). Ebert  envisions art being created by one person rather than a team of people having skilled enough abilities to produce the same masterpiece. He does not see a similarity in objectives between video games and an art piece. Ebert explains that in games there are, “Rules, points, objectives, and an outcome” (Ebert). As for art, that is something he believes one can’t win. Considering one who believes video games can not be a form of art may

The majority of video game adaptations are either critical or commercial flops. From 1993’s Super Mario Bros. to the recent Tomb Raider (2018) film, it is difficult finding a single adaptation held in high regard. This is baffling, as the two mediums have much in common. Although video games are interactive, both are visual medias, often following some sort of narrative, which over time grew more cinematic in their presentation overtime. There’s no all-encompassing reason as to why video game to film adaptations hold such a poor track-record. In some cases, the adaptation may be too much of a deviation from its source material (I.e. Resident Evil) or be incompetently produced by low-budget studios like House of the Dead (2003), or Alone in

Do you like art? Do you like video games? Have you ever wondered if video games can ever be recognized at art or a portrait? The article I have broken down and analyzed was an article called “Video Games Are Not Art by Roger Ebert. He explains that videos games can never be art because it is a disgrace tp professional artist out them to compare videos games with art that actually have meaning behind each corner, idea, color, structure, design. For example, art is identified as the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power. Videos are meant to be played and enjoyed not analyzed and broken down as a art piece or never will nor it be. Overall, I think the argument presented in “Video games can never be art by Roger Ebert is not partially effective on the target audience of people who believe in his opinion. As we explore Ebert’s argument’s that video games can’t be art, we will examine the strongest out of the argument (Ethos), followed by the middle logos, and finally the weakest of them all would be pathos.

Video games in today’s society have become very popular. Every new game that comes out to be played and conquered by the average gamer has its own category. There are several other types of genres of games that people play but because of big hit titles and the new popular game systems like the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3, people become more interested in a game that is well known than a game they have never even heard of before. Every game has its own storyline and own way of how it unfolds and where the game ends according to game play. Some of the biggest reasons people sway to certain genres of games is because of the game titles released under them and the demand of people who want a good game under that category. The top three most