Arguments About Parental Choice And Vaccination

1501 WordsNov 19, 20157 Pages
Arguments about parental choice and vaccination has at times been very debatable, nevertheless those on either spectrum of the argument are conscientious to the welfare of children. The objective of this particular study is to evaluate how the decision making process between parents who choose to delay or refuse vaccines for their children age 24 months differ from those who do not. In addition, this study incorporates the Health Belief Model and addresses key components which attempts to tackle how these decisions are made, and how psychosocial factors may influence these decisions. Method The method of selecting the sample was clearly defined and the sample size met the suggested guideline for minimum sample size. Data was collected using the National Immunization Survey (NIS). This was accomplished in two phases. Phase I, was the conduction of a telephone survey whose goal was geared to identify households that comprised children aged 19-35 months. During Phase II, surveys were mailed to those children’s vaccination providers. It was noted, that of the 17,313 children aged 19-35 months sampled by the NIS, the researchers analyzed data on a subsample of 11,206 children who were aged 24-35 months and who had adequate provider data returned from the mail in survey. According to the researchers 99.4% of respondents interviewed via telephone were either parents or grandparents and were determined to be the most knowledgeable person in the household
Open Document