Crazy to think that a person’s livelihood can be determined by their handwriting. Even crazier to think that these employers are so biased on who they hire because of how the person's handwriting looks. Many jobs nowadays require proper, legible, and neat handwriting and so if your handwriting isn’t developed to a certain extent you won’t receive the position you’re inquiring. Jobs get harder and harder to receive, but that’s only because the employers are so negative and so old fashioned. I feel as if it’s unjust and incorrect for employers to base the eligibility of the candidate due to something like handwriting Many employers reject employees due to their handwriting which is completely unfair. They tend to use the fact that the employees use …show more content…
The “newer generation uses shortcuts for many things and they have the ability to carry their point across with 140 characters and create clarity with the minimal amount of words. This does not necessarily mean that they are incompetent, it just means that they have adapted to the adjustments around them. In a way the adaptation is similar to natural selection. But because of these company executives and hiring staff, they most likely get turned down or can only get accepted by the lower end jobs that aren’t respectable or dependable. Some may say that schools overlooking the grammar aspect causes the students, who will later become employees will lose their opportunities because they aren’t up to date. It’s not a variable though because the people who create the hiring process only care about the handwriting neatness. It’s doesn’t make sense because the people of the future, the next generation, are to be taught that what they need to know to survive. This causes confusion because these same companies don’t make it clear on what type of employee that they
You are absolutely correct, the problem potentially lies with the candidate themselves. I have spoken to a few individuals who say they use “creative” words to boost up their resume, therefore I agree that without technology such as resume scanners, hiring employees would be a difficult process. Although I have not been in the market for a new job in a while, I recently decided to actively look for jobs in another state to be closer to family. Consequently I have found it difficult to get to the interview stage, after reading the course material, I’ve obtained a new outlook on resumes writing and job hunting. I know that in the past I have made the mistake of submitting a generic resume, I know that I need to make an effort to customize
Recently, Killian went through 100 letters that arrived at his agency from applicants requesting jobs and interviews. Of the 100, not one was without some kind of spelling, grammar or syntax error.
In our digital age, people are increasingly using social networking sites like Facebook and MySpace to share personal experiences, relati onships, opinions, and accomplishments with family and "friends." They view their Web sites as private and their right to voice their opinions or post pictures of themselves as protected free speech. Should employers have the right to terminate employees based on personal information that the employee has posted online? In most cases, the answer to this question is "no."
Imagine a scenario where Kanye West is in his Los Angeles home with his wife and daughter and the police knock on his door. They arrest him based on exposing the American population to vulgarity, indecency, racist and sexist comments that offend many people. The government does not want America to be subjected to this type of music and turn the American culture into something more bigoted than it already is. However, a situation like this would never occur in the present day American society. That does not mean it could not happen in the future. Many American citizens are promoting censorship to an extreme that it could possibly become a reality. The American citizens claim that censorship is needed to shelter America’s citizens, but
The Agreement created herein, can be renewed for one year subsequent to effective termination date, by written notice signed by all parties, acknowledging their desire to renew the Agreement. Notice of renewal shall be given and signed by all parties by no later than 45 days prior to the then effective termination date of the Agreement. If this Agreement is not renewed pursuant to the terms herein, it shall automatically renew under the terms and conditions contained herein on the then effective termination
In F451, Government uses censorship as a form of oppression, which is wrong because it takes away freedom and human rights. One way they do this is when firemen burn books to keep the populous from reading the books and obtaining information from them. Another way is how the government controls the people 's every move, “ My uncle was arrested another time… for being a pedestrian.” Page 7. Similar to they way Nazi Germany controlled the populous of its time. And how on the train they play loud music to keep people from focusing and thinking. One way of thinking in the book is that the government burns books because some of them make people unhappy. Governments use censorship as a form of oppression of the populous.
Interestingly, a few years ago, the College Board found that students who indicated in cursive for the essay proportion of the SAT scored scarcely higher than those who printed, which experts believe is because the speed and efficiency of inciting in cursive sanctioned the students to fixate on the content of their essay.Some argue that the cursive is no longer germane because it isn't included in the mundane core state standards. But these standards only include those skills that are testable and quantifiable in the classroom; they don't address facile substructure skills, like editing or even spelling.
Elementary schools used to have a major focus on handwriting and teaching the students how to write in cursive. There is a section on the SAT where each student has to write out a code of honorability in cursive. In the small classroom that I sat in to take the SAT, four students raised their hand and said they never learned cursive. Now, students take more time doing typing exercises on the computer. This is what technology is doing to our
In the second article, the author states that, "Handwriting has taken a backseat to typing as technology dominates the way we communicate." but why should we be forced to choose one over the other? Being proficient in typing should not compromise your ability to read and write in cursive script, as both are extremely valuable skills to have in the twenty-first century. Though it is true that we are evolving into a keyboard based society, technological advancements and cursive script can co-exist, and for the better. The author of the
Censorship, the control of the information and ideas circulated within a society, has been a characteristic of dictatorships throughout history. In the 20th Century, censorship was achieved through the examination of books, plays, films, television and radio programs, news reports, and other forms of communication for the purpose of altering or suppressing ideas found to be objectionable or offensive. There have been assorted justifications for censorship, with some censors targeting material deemed to be indecent or obscene. Because of this, ideas have been suppressed under the disguise of protecting three basic social institutions: the family, the church, and the state. In Ray Bradbury’s book, Farenheit 451,
When a graphologist wishes to examine the person’s handwriting they measure a variety of aspects. They measure the amount of pressure that is put on the paper while writing, the slants, the angles, and spacing of the letters. Graphology looks at the reasons for the variations in the writing and finds the correct trait to tie it with. While you are writing you generally don’t focus on making every letter the uniform structure that was taught in kindergarten. In this way the writer is unaware of the hints that they are giving away as these hints are mostly subconscious. Although this technique seems to be trustworthy and a valid source of information, there is still questions about the links between the aspects of handwriting and the
Censorship is a tool used by the predominant power to maintain status-quo and stifle those who would challenge their assumptions by written word or speech. Freedom of speech is designed to allow voices, no matter how objectionable they are to the majority, the ability to express themselves without fear of reprisal. the only defense the people have against a tyrannical government is a well informed electorate; and the only way to insure a well informed electorate is with a free and open press.
Imagine a society without censorship, where everyone knows each other’s secrets, it would be lethal for society. What would happen if people knew one’s weaknesses?. There is evil that needs to be censored. Censorship is necessary in our society for many different reasons. It protects nations, prevents conflict in society, it protects the morals/privacy of people, and it is also helpful for children.
Handwriting analysis is the belief that a person’s personality can be seen in their handwriting. Looking at someone’s handwriting does not involve the scientific method.
I agree that typewriter using computer printing would lower the likelihood of being caught with fraud documentation. As we all know that no one has the same handwriting because everyone of us write with different force and unique characteristic that differentiate from everyone else. The problem today is that people don't use handwriting anymore because is not legible compare to typing and printing. I worry that our future children and generation might not use handwriting because laptop and tablet and being introduce to school as an alternative for original paper and handwriting. The whole purpose of that was to save tree and the