Arguments Against Cloning

First, cloning is a bad thing because most things that undergo cloning have many medical disorders and die an early death. On https://listontap.com/10-reasons-human -cloning-bad-society-large/ they gave marvelous examples why. It took exactly 277 eggs to make a clone of Dolly. That shows how little attempt at cloning fail. Another thing is Many cloned animals have under formed hearts lungs and other organs. That just goes to show how cloning animals is not very practical for the animals only live around half the lifespan of their breed of animal. Take Dolly's clone her clone died at, 6 years old, half of what sheep of her breed live. Over all cloning is mostly unsuccessful.

     As soon as you mention the word cloning, you are most likely to ignite a debate. This is because people are greatly divided on whether it's good or bad. A way to reach a conclusion is to look at cloning from ethical, risk, and religious perspectives. The reality is, cloning is unethical, very risky, and irreligious. The arguments I will make will hopefully convince you that cloning is not good for the future.

In conclusion I believe that cloning is a bad thing to do to any living organism on this earth . I believe that cloning is considered animal abuse but it still happens . I believe it is domestic violence , but it still happens , and quite a few animals have died because of it . I knew about cloning but i have never researched it . But learning and researching about cloning helped me better understand that it is a bad thing to do to any living organism .

There are many arguments against cloning. Leon R. Kass bases his argument on repugnance in his article The Wisdom of Repugnance. He is a well-known physician, educator and scientist. Kass perceives cloning as offensive, grotesque revolting, repulsive and wrong. To establish his argument he states, “Most people recoil from the prospect of mass production or human being, with large clones of look-alikes, compromised in their individuality.”1 His rationale is cloning is unnatural, because it is asexual and requires only one parent. Kass believes that cloning turns natural procreation into a manufactured process, which is not natural or moral. In his essay he also points out that cloning will also change the way we see ourselves through our

I do not think that cloning should not be allowed in the United States let alone in the rest of the world. It can be done on people and animals after they are dead. People think that cloning will ease the pain of the dead when the clone is not the same person. The person or animal is gone and the clone is not going to ease the pain. You just have to deal with the pain and you will slowly get through it cloning will never get rid of it.

Phillip Elmer states that “Americans find human cloning deeply troubling” (2). Cloning should be banned because it is unethical, problematic, unpredictable, and lastly can cause loss of identity.

Scientists have discovered that cloning will be harmful for humans. Babies will suffer birth imperfection and medical context. Human cloning is illegal in most of the countries like Canada, U.S., Australia and more. Scientists are trying for cloning, but people are against

Cloning is bad because the clone will carry on abnormalities and desisses from the first person, effecting the future generations. Another reason its bad is because no one knows what could go. The possibilities of what could go wrong are endless. Clones lives are majorly impacted due to the fact that they are clones. Overall cloning has negitive impact in this world. The world will be a better place if you agree with me and put an end to the unnsesasary idea of

In conclusion, cloning should not be allowed and it should be outright banned. Cloning should not be allowed because it is against nature and how the natural way occurs. Second, cloning talks many attempts to try and most of the attempts are futile. It takes a lot of time and energy to conceive a organism and most of the time after being born, the organism is usually unhealthy and would usually not live long. Third, cloning reduces the genetic diversity in organisms. Cloning should be banned and not

Have you heard about the new bill coming up, if you haven't let me tell you what I think you should vote on it. I think you should vote no on the new cloning law coming up. I think it is immoral to clone humans. I also think that we shouldn’t waste taxpayer money to do it, it is morally incorrect, and it could lead down a dark future. I think that we should completely ban cloning of humans. It isn’t right to make an exact copy of someone. Especially for medical research or to harvest him just for his parts. It sacrifices one life just to save another. That is definitely not what this country is about or wants. Especially if they have multiple medical problems in their lifetime. Ten people could be murdered just for the safety of another. It is completely wrong and immoral.

Cloning by definition taken from the Oxford Dictionary is a plant or an animal that produced naturally or artificially from the cells of another plant or animal and so the same as it. The first cloned adult mammal is a sheep named Dolly. The aim of research into human cloning has never been to clone people, or to make babies. The original aim of human cloning research is to get stem cell to cure a disease. It is inevitable that one day this knowledge of human cloning would be abused. As time goes by, the scientist started to think deeply and this is how the concept of cloned human being introduced. There are a few reasons why the human cloning is illegal by the laws. Human cloning research faces with many problems since it first announced

Should mankind really become corrupt all because humans want to clone others and perfect them, out right defying nature? Cloning is when you create similar populations with genetically identical beings. Cloning, for example, is when you have a cow and produce another cow that is identical to the original cow. To clone an animal, you must extract DNA from the cell of the animal and place that DNA onto an egg cell from another animal. Who actually thought of and started cloning is unclear. Scientist debate whether cloning is moral or not. Even though cloning can cure genetic diseases, one’s life span shortens. The overall result is that cloning is

If a random individual were asked twenty years ago if he/she believed that science could clone an animal, most would have given a weird look and responded, “Are you kidding me?” However, that once crazy idea has now become a reality, and with this reality, has come debate after debate about the ethics and morality of cloning. Yet technology has not stopped with just the cloning of animals, but now many scientists are contemplating and are trying to find successful ways to clone human individuals. This idea of human cloning has fueled debate not just in the United States, but also with countries all over the world. I believe that it is not morally and ethically right

I am a student at Dinuba High School and I’m writing to express my objection to human cloning. Cloning should be banned and illegal because neither the animal or human gets the same personalities and can mess them up forever.

Beginning with the moral argument, one must understand reproductive freedom. Most cloning activists say that reproduction, or the lack there of, is a natural freedom given to people (C). Restricting human cloning would be a violation of that right. Just as people can choose not to reproduce using contraception, abortion, or abstinence, people should be allowed to use all means possible within their ability to reproduce, such as through cloning and in vitro fertilization (C). Cloning is the application of this right specifically (C). Another benefit of cloning is the ability to clone someone who has died to console those who are grieving over their lost loved one or to clone the DNA of a person that was known for his of her greatness. Scientists would be able to recreate these people in a new environment (C). A clone's parent may have come from