Arguments Against Gun Laws

More background checks and laws need to be made in order to prevent guns from falling into the wrong hands. In cities that already have tough regulations, there is still an issue with residents getting firearms from elsewhere. This is proven by Tucker (2016) when she says, “Gun rights advocates note that Chicago already has tough firearms regulations, but that doesn't prevent nearby jurisdictions from selling weapons to Chicago residents.” (p. 2). USA Today (2017) reported as well that, “As for federal gun laws, mental illness disqualifies people from buying or possessing a gun only after they've been involuntarily committed by a court.” (p. 2). This does not make society any safer because the laws that prevent mentally ill civilians from

To be honest, it makes sense… no guns, no gun violence. Not to mention, with regards to United States history, gun regulations are not a recent motion. Indeed, the first federal gun control law was the National Firearms Act of 1934. This law required that all sales of firearms to be documented in the national registry. Following the National Firearms Act of 1934, the Gun Control Act of 1968, the first major gun control law in the United States, passed. This law “prohibited certain people from being able to purchase firearms including convicted felons, fugitives, minors, individuals with a history of mental illness, dishonorable discharged veterans, expatriates and illegal aliens” (Riczo 2001). It also extended licensing conditions to more gun merchants and required a more in depth record of sales. In brief, the rules to acquire a firearm became stricter and the thought behind it was that it would decrease crime. Nevertheless, with the increase in gun violence, it is not certain that laws will prevent future

Guns and weaponry have always been a major part of the cultures of the world since the beginning of time. For the United States of America, gun use can be traced back to the colonial days, our revolutionary roots. They have helped the United States turn the table specifically in times of dire need such as the Revolutionary War. Not only have advances in weaponry influenced the U.S., they have also helped to shape events across the globe. In 1791, this was understood by the Founding Fathers while writing the Constitution, which can be seen in the Second Amendment: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”[1]. With the advancement of guns specifically, there has been a rise in mass shootings, casualties, crime and controversy that has begun to split the United States. All a person has to do is turn on the television to a news channel, and at any given time, heartache, most often linked to guns, can be found. Some cry for a need for better gun regulation or sometimes complete abolishment for recreational use, while others cling to their weapons with claim of self-defense and economic profit. Violent crimes have been on the rise years; there has been an estimated 1.2 billion crimes of violence that occurred in the United States alone [2]. One thing is certain: gun trade and regulation boosts the economy. Last year, 301,

Jill Silos-Rooney’s current professional associations include Bethel Woods Center for the Arts., MassBay Community College, and Oxford University Press. She begins her article, “The Top 3 Liberal Arguments for Gun Control”, with an anecdote about a nine-year-old girl who accidentally killed her gun instructor with an Uzi and proceeds to list off two counterarguments and rebuttals and three assertions for gun control in her Thought Co. article, covering what she believes the best arguments for said gun control are. Her strongest pieces of evidence that support her central claim that “America Needs More Gun Control” (page 1) are “Australia, which has a similar frontier history to that of the United

The argument of gun control has become a debate of society. There is a lot of emotional rhetoric behind this debate. Gun control will not work as statistics, history (with other foreign countries), and common sense have shown. Gun laws will not significantly modify the already false accusations made against guns and gun violence.

i support gun control in many ways because i feel that it can benefit our world and us humans in multiple different ways

The development of modern weapons began in 1364. Since then, the evolution of weapons has grown. The first reported rifle appeared in 1498, and the first pistol was debuted in 1750. As America was discovering her identity, wars such as the American Revolution and American Civil War, has encouraged the use of firearm. Guns originated as a weapon of defense, however in recent years people worldwide have taken advantage of the loose weapon control. In regards to Paul Waldman’s argument in the article “ The Case For Banning Guns” Paul states the following , “ Over 30,000 Americans dead every year, and tens of thousands more maimed and paralyzed. Can you imagine how many restrictions on our rights wed’d welcome if terrorists were killing 30,000 of us a year?” With that said, it depicts a vivid image of the disconnect among guns and the people. If the government regulated gun laws, the murder, homicide, and mass shooting rate would rapidly decrease. However, in the article “ The Case Against Banning Guns” the writer Shiha Dalmia argues otherwise. “ There are about 300 million guns in this country- nearly one for every man, woman, and child. Congress can pass all the regulations it wants --- and even declare an outright ban on guns.” (Dalmia.) Meaning, if laws were enforced, and people were wanting

The truth is that people kill people, and a gun is just a gun that is used by people as a weapon. A gunshot involves movement and action to pull that trigger. When people say that gun control is good because guns are only made to kill, then why do they not question the people who pull that gun’s trigger. What would happen if instead of guns being banned, criminals were banned since they are the ones who commit the crimes? People who support gun control might say that gun control can help lower deaths, lower crimes, and most importantly save the innocent children and families. This, however, is false because gun control does not “save” or “protect” anyone, in fact, it might only end up harming people. Places that do not have gun control are

Gun control laws represent the citizens right to firearms and limits their collections to a path for public safety. In a political stance this is a career building action, are you for guns or against them. This decision brings a whole new demographic of supporters, and siding with one will gain you popularity. In my own opinion, because I have no career facing gun control, I believe that guns should be allowed to be sold with background test. Why? Because people will find guns in places other than shops, at least if somebody is killed by a retail gun law enforcement would have a place to start looking. Arguments against guns in recent history, movie theater, and club shooting all are due to the human condition in seeing our self above anyone

Providing peace and security is the most remarkable issue in throughout the world. In some countries, laws are flexible and government permits ordinary people to have firearm to defend themselves against attacker while some people argue that being armed by hand gun will give rise to security problems. To me it seems there are various reasons that prove using a gun causes a lot of dangerous situations.

In the aspect of the business world and day to day life there are many U.S. civilians who have made the choice to own firearms for self defense. Those who oppose gun ownership believe that these gun owners are a threat to themselves and others because they have exposure to firearms, so is this the case? Statistically I would say no. Women can be subject to sexual abuse which is awful, and as a general whole, men tend to be stronger and able to over power a women and take advantage of them. It would seem reasonable for women to have a system to provide themselves with a mechanical advantage over these men. Well according to Kleck and Gertz a group of profesores who study firearm violence at Florida State University as many as 200,000 women use

Guns - for the average citizen, or just military and law enforcement, the controversy about citizens owning guns is becoming a more heated debate. Some people believe that the average citizen should not be able to own and carry firearms. However, citizens should be allowed to carry firearms because farmers and ranchers need to be able to protect their herds and livestock from coyotes and other predators. People in the city or suburbs, or even the countryside need to protect themselves from crime. The hunters of northern Montana need to hunt the deer they depend on for food over the winter. The law that has been put in place where we live is known as the NY SAFE Act. Under this new law, citizens must register their firearms and have them permanently

It was 2:45 pm in Atlantic city and a boy named Chris was walking from school. He lived in poor part of the city, He usually walked with friends but today he was all alone. It was a 15 minute walk from school, He heard sirens and people running from a local apartment building. He always saw this type of behavior so he kept walking. He heard footsteps behind him and a deep voice behind him with a pointy object said. “ Keep walking and don’t try to run”.There are so many reasons why gun laws should be changed immediately.

Security remains critical and critical to peaceful coexisting amongst the people of a specific community. Security agencies ensure that everything runs typically as peace can engage in various activities in the different walks of life without fear or intimidation of any kind. The government upholds and remains responsible for the security of its people. This lead to the establishment of relevant law enforcement agencies such as security forces for example police unit. However, some of the governments are unable to provide the security needs to all the citizens hence some of the citizens acquire gun licensing to safeguard their interests. As gun control debate remains very controversial given the different perceptions, the paper seeks addresses the argument in support and against the gun control in the United States.

In the United States, citizens have debated over whether or not gun control is a good solution in our country for years. The debates form two sides: one side that’s in favor of gun control and one that is against gun control. As of late, individuals on the pro side pro-gun control argued that the numerous shootings in our nation were mostly because of our country’s need for gun control. People would find that answer reasonable, but in reality, it is an over-generalization; there are numerous other variables that play a portion in horrific event shootings. Those who are against gun control have claimed that gun control laws violate citizen’s constitutional rights. Numerous citizens would say that neither both in favor and against gun control is right, but when the facts are displayed it is self-evident that gun control is not a great solution since “guns don’t kill people, people kill people”. Stopping criminals and put more priority on their punishment is a better solution than restricting citizens the right to own firearms and taking them away. Gun control should be reduced in the United States because it’s our constitutional right, armed citizens prevent most crimes, and countries with high gun control have high crime rates.