Arguments Against Imperialism

On the other hand, the cons of imperialism were what benefited Europeans and infuriated the Asians, and Africans. Many individuals and groups resisted imperial rule. European tried many ways to westernize the subject people’s cultures. Many of the resources that were manufactured profited the Europeans rather than the Indians. A cash crop economy was established

Imperialism was a time period in which more developed nations colonized less developed nations. The developed nations took advantage of the less developed nations resources, people, lands, and much more. Many countries lost their freedom and independence due to imperialism, however, they also received new technologies and innovations.

Imperialism is the spread of control over territories across the globe. The Industrial Revolution and interests in nationalism created a new period of imperialism around 1750. Old imperialism lasted from 1450- 1750, but imperialism alone remained until 1914.Old imperialism and new imperialism shared the same basic concept of controlling and utilizing foreign countries. Old imperialism focused mainly on systems of trade while new imperialism took bolder steps to overtaking nations.

Imperialism- a policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force.

Imperialism is a factor that has transformed societies and nations over the course of history. In the past, nations such as France, Great Britain, Germany, and Spain have been categorized as “imperialistic” nations. These nations referred to advanced technology as power. The industrial revolution and increase in new technology gave them the idea to want to spread their ideas to other countries around the world. This involved taking over nations and building colonies to benefit the mother country.

Imperialism brought great new philosophies and inventions to underdeveloped countries that had yet to be modernized. For example, in Africa the amount of local war reduced, the average life span increased, and there was an economic expansion. Another example is in India where the third largest railroad was built.

Imperialism is a policy of extending a country power or influence through either military or by trade. Imperialism was a legitimate policy for the United states to follow in the beginning of the nineteenth century, because it spread Christianity, increase economic power and profits and it benefit the weaker countries that united states take over.

Imperialism,-a more powerful country subjugating a weaker nation to it’s benefit, has been a part of human civilization for centuries, people take advantage of each other, its human nature.

And therefore, it was just a policy for the United States to follow. There are many ways the U.S. benefited from imperialism. But one of the main reason that really motivated the American imperialism is economic reason. The European nations including the United States traded with weaker countries like Japan, Hawaii ,and China in which both countries made important gains.

Imperialism is the domination of a weaker country by a stronger country. For instance Britain dominated India and China in the mid 1880s to the beginning of the 20th century. Imperialism has had both a positive and negative effects on the countries involved. Britain was imperialistic for many reasons, it could dominate because it had the technology and power to do so. They also needed land to acquire raw materials for growing markets.

There are arguments that are for and against American imperialism. One of the arguments against American imperialism would be the hypocrisy. They say that the government can be chosen by the people. Another argument would that now America would be involved with Asian conflicts. Also, if a president or leader acts tyrannical to other countries, then who could say that the president or leader would act like that in our home country. It also went against Christian beliefs, it forced people to follow and go along.

After meeting with all of the characters and listening to their different perspectives on imperialism Ii would like to maintain my current position as an anti imperialist. When listening to the characters present their cases and respond to questions I have come to the conclusion that America has no altruistic morals of helping out other nations, but instead we have goals to marginalize and exploit people from a different culture.we should focus on the problems that lie at home in expanding shouldn't be our primary focus which would in turn increase the problems in America. Sure this would boost our economy but i see know reason why we can't do this by industrializing the south. Furthermore with rises of groups such as the kkk and jim crow

Imperialism- a policy of expanding ones country's power and influence through the means of diplomacy or military power. In other words taking over lands that either haven't been claimed by a powerful adversary that one wouldn't want a conflict with or don't have any uses or resources worth colonizing. Imperialism occurred mostly through the utilization of a nation’s military, but every now and then greater nations would swindle a native out of their land. Although imperialism is for the betterment of one nation it is a fall for the other. Victims of imperialism become subject to cruel and harsh regimes. So a logical question that's asked is how could one rationalize

needed on the European home front. Imperialism provided a way in which unemployed laborers could obtain jobs and/or riches. Not all motives for imperialism were greedy and self-motivating however. The earnest desire of some to help civilize and Christianize natives was the utmost reason for imperialism.

The textbook definition states imperialism as “the policy of extending the rule or authority of an empire or nation over foreign countries, or of acquiring and holding colonies and dependencies” (“Imperialism”). In short, imperialism is the act of an empire governing a foreign territory. George Orwell visualizes this act for us in the short story of Shooting an Elephant. Throughout the story, the reader follows through the eyes of a young English officer who polices the Burmese. The audience is introduced quickly to his bitterness, yet pity toward the Burmese, and his anger at his mother country for having him appointed to govern them. Interestingly, the take on this story is not the perspective of a commoner who witnesses imperialism, but of an officer who takes part in it. As a result, the reader is exposed to the realization that the soldiers and officers who infiltrate the foreign environment do it under orders, not their own decision. It is not disclosed why the young officer has been assigned his position, leading one to conclude that it is a matter of resources.