Arguments Against Interracial Marriage

The argument over the legalization of same sex marriages is rapidly becoming one of the most vigorously advocated reform subjects in recent law review. Being gay and loving someone is not illegal, but uniting that couple in a legal marriage is rejected by most of society in this country. Each state has had to deal with legal issues concerning same sex marriages to some extent. Most supporters of the ban on gay marriages believe that it would be a strong cause of immorality and corruption of the American family. People who do not support same sex marriages believe that it would create an unhealthy family, and could cause serious harm to children in that family, while supporters

The definition of marriage has changed over time. At the beginning of the nineteenth century, the United States defined marriage as a union between a consenting man and woman, of non-African decent (Stahlberg, 2008, p. 443). This, however, changed after the civil war. In 1868 two consenting adults of opposite gender could marry someone of the same race, but this was also restructured in 1967 to allow marriage of all consenting adults of opposite genders regardless of race (Stahlberg, 2008, p. 443). Today, the law looks very different. Recently, on June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples have the right to marriage (gay marriage, 2015).

A political argument against same sex marriage is that it ruins the sanctity of marriage. Even if this were true, sanctity, as defined by the Oxford English Dictionary, is “the state or quality of being holy, sacred, or saintly.” Meaning that the word sanctity itself refers to religion. The fact of the matter is, even if same sex marriage ruins the “sanctity” of marriage, homosexuals want marriage in a purely legal form and religion should have no say in it. Same sex marriage is not prohibited in our constitutional rights and therefore should be perfectly legal in this country, if religion had no influence in the matter. Another example of religion and politics joined in an offbeat dance is the topic of abortion. One of the arguments against abortion is that it is immoral because it kills a living being. As if this country was built on morality. Which goes back to one of the bible’s ten commandments, “thou shalt not kill”. Which don’t get me wrong, society is better off having that embedded in their moral codes. But the way I see abortion is the same way I see having scrambled eggs for breakfast. Killing an embryo is equivalent to killing a baby chicken in my eyes. I bet the pope has a nice big omelet before he attends his sermon. In my own personal opinion, religion should remain what it truly is, a voluntary belief, nor science and

Since the Loving V. Virginia case was settled in favor of Loving, interracial marriage became legal. Today more people are choosing to find their spouse outside of their race.

Interracial marriages are still considered taboo in many countries in the world and even in the United States. While the opportunity to marry whoever one desires is a reality in America, it is not always common and sometime frowned upon in our communities. Much progress has been made as a country to allow interracial marriages to be successful, but the American population has had difficulty accepting the legal development that has taken place in our nation. Interracial Marriage has been fought throughout our history but is not an unethical relationship in fact it creates avenues to expand our diversity as a human race.

The line may be blurred when it comes to politic; many conservatives are against same sex marriage; while liberals are fighting for the right to have equal opportunity. The Christian politicians are using religious opinions to establish that homosexuality is a disgrace. While this may be their belief, this country was founded on religious freedom, meaning that people are permitted to worship how they see fit or to not worship. A ground rule, set up from the very foundation of this country that states a separation needs to be made between religion and government, so the two shall never be combined. We may all have a different opinion to what is what we think is ethical, but it might be safe to reason that we can agree that it’s unfair for people to be treated differently for being of different race, ethnicity, physical traits, and that the government should not discriminate against residents or visitors in that country because they have what would be considered an “unusual” sexual orientation. The constitution is considered to be one of the greatest manuscripts written in the history of the United States. An article of that manuscript requires each State to recognize the public acts, archives, and litigations of other States. So, as soon as one State legalizes gay marriage, like it has already happened in California since 2008, other states have to respect the unions taken place there. That means many

This has caused tremendous tremors around the entire United States. It 's has developed civil rights issues, creating unique cases that have even made it to the Supreme Court. Cases such United States vs. Windsor and Hollingsworth vs. Perry. In the case of Hollingsworth v Perry the issue was that in May 2009, a California District Court ruled that Proposition 8 violated the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment and temporarily prohibited its enforcement, and the Ninth Circuit agreed, affirming the District Court’s ruling. (Santoro, law. Cornell) The United States Supreme Court will now consider whether a state can define marriage solely as the union of a man and a woman, in addition to considering whether the proponents of Proposition 8 have standing to bring suit in federal court. (Santoro, law. Cornell) The Court’s ruling will implicate the rights of gay men and lesbians, the role of the government in structuring family and society, and the relationship between the institution of marriage and religion and morality. (Santoro, law. Cornell) These style of cases show how vastly apart the United States are in these manners. The main reasoning for how we perceive these specific issues is based

A question that some may ask is, what exactly is gay marriage? Gay marriage or same-sex marriage is the legal and social recognition that a joining (marriage) between two persons of the same social gender or biological sex takes place (Quick). As of February 9, 2015, gay marriage has been legalized in 37 American states and the district of Columbia(Marriage). While the remaining states have gay marriage bans through laws, constitutional amendments, or both. Proponents argue that same-sex couples ought to have access to the same marriage benefits and public acceptance enjoyed by heterosexual couples, and that prohibiting gay marriage is unconstitutional discrimination. Opponents argue that altering the traditional definition of marriage between a man and a woman will further weaken a threatened institution. They believe that legalizing gay marriage is a slippery slope that will lead to polygamous relationships. Gay marriage has come a long way from the 1980 's when only few Americans ever thought of marrying someone of the same sex(Wood). Same-sex couples have a history of fighting for their

Many people oppose the legalization of same-sex marriages because they are "morally" wrong. These people, however, are confusing religious aspects of marriage with legal ones. The legalities of the issue have nothing to do with what a religion specifies. A "legal" marriage is a contract established by the state government. No matter where it takes place, a marriage is not legal unless accompanied by an official marriage license. [2] A church can choose to recognize whatever unions it wants, regardless of what the government says is legal. Because of the separation of church and state, no religious body can dictate state policy; therefore, civil marriage laws lie solely to the state. The church and the state often differ in opinion over who may marry. In fact, many churches choose to recognize same-sex couples, oftentimes through ceremonial blessings. These churches have realized that all couples need both social and spiritual support to truly thrive. When these couples cannot obtain a state marriage license, the church often unites them.

“For decades, conservative Christians who oppose LGBT equality have singled out the federal government or secular atheists as their preferred enemy in public settings, blasting both groups for supposedly attacking “traditional marriage” or infringing on their religious liberty.” (Jenkins, 2015) Conservative Christians are really against same sex marriage because it is not a “normal marriage”.

Same sex- marriage is still the topic of many peoples conversation across the country. Citizens, divided by politic party, are very passionate about how they feel about it. The president didn’t approve of it at first, but now he finally accepts same- sex marriage, the Judicial System uses its power to dictate to the States, forcing them to accept same- sex marriage. Both houses of Congress continue to debate what marriage means.

Gay marriage is a very controversial issue that has emerged in our society. Depending on your upbringing and your mentality, individuals have formed their own personal opinions and have taken sides, either to support or to oppose the issue. Gay marriage throughout the years has sparked so much controversy that it was brought to the United States Supreme Court, which is known to be the highest court of all the land. It is up to the justices of the court to determine how states and society view and treat gay marriage. Whether it being legalized throughout the country or only in certain states, it is, now legalized and recognized as a legitimate marriage in certain state.

It has been clarified that same-sex couples who may only enter into a civil union, has faced to a marriage, they have denied equal access to all the benefits, rights, and privileges provided by federal law to those of married couples, that has adverse effects on the wellbeing of same sex partners. Gay marriage is one of the most controversial issues in the modern world. For the previous thousand years, marriage has been recognized as the social union between a man and a woman. In most cultures across the nation, homosexuality was viewed with disdain, and marriages between same-sex couples were forbidden.

Marriage is both a civic and religious institution, and the question of whether the state should be able to regulate marriage is hence quite interesting. On the one hand, America believes in a separation of church and state. On the other, it believes in freedom and equality, and to uphold these for same-sex couples in the form of same-sex marriage, it would have to interfere with the religious institution of marriage. I believe that same-sex couples should have every right to get married, because married couples receive a number of federal and state benefits, and denying these benefits to someone because of their sexuality goes against the ideal of equality. Several of the arguments against same-sex marriage tend to be moralistic or religious. Some say that same-sex marriage brings disadvantages to the children that come from these marriages. However, same-sex couples are more likely to adopt than heterosexual couples, and their children tend to fare equally well socially as compared to children of heterosexual couples (whatweknow.com). If a religious group does choose to discriminate against a group of people, this discrimination should not reflect in political institutions that claim to be separate from the state. In my opinion, marriage as a civic institution should be accessible to any two consenting adults, regardless of factors like sex, race, and class.

The lawful issues encompassing same-sex marriage in the United States are muddled by the country 's government arrangement of government. Before 1996 and the death of the Protection of Marriage Act, the government lawfully perceived any marriage that was perceived by one of the States, regardless of the possibility that a few